17. Jackson-Walker LLP., Defamation Case, representing the defendant. Examined software systems and technology to determine accuracy and plausibility claims made by the Plaintiff.
16. Jackson-Walker LLP., Second Defamation Case, representing the defendant. Examined software systems and technology to determine accuracy and plausibility claims made by the Plaintiff.
15. Kirkland & Ellis LLP. Served as an expert in a defamation case, representing the defendant. Examined software systems and technology to determine accuracy and plausibility claims made by the Plaintiff.
14. Winston & Strawn LLP. Served as an expert in a defamation Case, representing the defendant. Examined software systems and technology to determine accuracy and plausibility claims made by the Plaintiff.
13. THOMPSON & HORTON LLP. Served as an expert on an election challenge case, representing the defendant. Examined software systems and technology to determine the accuracy of claims made by the Plaintiff and to reveal digital forensic information to understand the impact of election technology faults on the subject election.
12. International Federal government entity. Consulted with analysis, design, and development for a national election system, focused on security issues associated with electronic voting. The system was fielded and used to collect millions of votes in subsequent elections.
11. Voter Registration System Company. Consulted on claims of security vulnerability in a voter registration product line that was, and remains, in active use in several states.
10. International Federal government entity. Conducted analysis, design, and development for a national election system, focused on security issues associated with electronic voting. The system was fielded and used to collect millions of votes in subsequent elections.
9. The U.S. Elections Assistance Commission (EAC). Led a team of scientists to examine voting systems based on their security properties to establish a process for assessing their comparative risk. The project was completed and accepted by the EAC and its report continues to be referenced by voting system integrity scientists.
8. Florida Department of Elections. Led an independent expert review of the Pnyx.core ODBP 1.0 remote voting software, which was proposed for implementation in an overseas electronic ballot return pilot program. The review extended over a period of approximately three months and was performed by a team of six independent technical experts. Alec selected and invited the participants and oversaw the research and reporting process. The report was accepted by the state and was completed on September 19th, 2008
7. Florida Department of Elections. Led a team of scientists to examine software for Diebold Elections Systems TSx touch screen (version 4.6.5) and optical scan voting system software, that was purchased by the state of Florida. The Diebold Voting Machine Software project report was delivered and accepted in December 2007.
6. Florida Department of Elections. Led a team of scientists to re-examine updated software for Diebold Voting System version 1.96.8 system that was purchased by the state of Florida. The Diebold Voting Machine Software project supplemental report was delivered and accepted in August 2007.
5. Florida Department of Elections. Led a team of scientists to examine software for the Diebold Voting System software version 1.96.8 voting system that was purchased by the state of Florida. The Diebold Voting Machine Software project report was delivered and accepted by the state in July 2007.
4. Florida Department of Elections. Led a team of scientists to examine iVotronic Firmware Versions 9.1.8.0 and 9.2.0.0 that was purchased by the state of Florida. This was a follow-up to the examination performed during the Florida District 13 (CD13) election audit. The report was completed and accepted by the state in July 2007.
3. Voter Registration System Company. Consulted on the security posture in their product line. The supported entity remains a central figure in electronic voting system vendors nationwide with a footprint in at least 6 states.
2. Florida Department of Elections. Led a team of experts in conducting a forensic investigation of the 2006 congressional election in Florida District 13 (CD13). This was the first such software examination of a contested federal election in the United States. The final report was filed in court and incorporated into the contest record. Its results were published in May 2007 and were accepted for the state audit.
Comptroller, State of Florida. Acted as an expert in examining a procurement of a database system to determine its compliance with state requirements.