The following is a supplement to the basic information in the Call for Papers for the 2nd Annual R-PAS in Multimethod Assessment Conference. 

The Scope

The scope of our conference is to provide a platform for a diverse range of work, with a particular focus on the Rorschach Performance Assessment System (R-PAS) and multimethod assessment. Our primary objectives are to facilitate international collaboration among R-PAS clinicians, researchers, instructors, and supervisors to create a unified space where we can:

• Engage in Networking and Offering Support: Meet new colleagues and develop professional relationships for discussion, collaboration, and support around using R-PAS in teaching, research, and practice.

• Advance Evidence-Based Practices: Promote the utilization of R-PAS based on empirical evidence, enhancing its effectiveness and credibility in clinical and research settings.

• Improve Case Conceptualization: Refine your understanding of how R-PAS contributes to and informs case conceptualization and intervention.

• Integrate International Insights: Foster the integration of international research findings and perspectives, enriching the global understanding and application of R-PAS.

• Enhance Utility: Strive to maximize the utility of R-PAS in diverse professional contexts, while maintaining its clinical richness and adaptability to the needs of users.

Through these overarching goals, our conference serves as a dynamic hub for the exchange of knowledge, experiences, and innovations in the realm of Rorschach assessment, ultimately elevating its practice and impact on both clinical and research fronts. We strongly encourage submissions addressing diversity and cultural implications for using R-PAS in practice, training, and research.

The Focus

The 2nd Annual R-PAS in Multimethod Assessment Conference 2025 revolves around two key pillars: R-PAS in multimethod assessment and clinical practice. Ideally, abstracts should integrate both of these central themes, demonstrating R-PAS's capabilities in a comprehensive way.

Presentations can be in the following formats and modalities:

• Symposium (Research and Cases)

• Roundtable

• Oral Presentation

• Poster Presentation

Please indicate to which of the following categories your presentation applies (Choose All That Apply):

1. Children

2. Adolescents

3. Adults

4. Basic Cognition, Perception, Emotion

5. Personality      

6. Psychosis

7. Psychopathology Other Than Psychosis

8. Neuropsychology or Neuroscience

9. Education and Training     

10. Historical developments of the Rorschach (e.g., inkblots, interpretation systems, etc.)

11. Clinical Practice

12. Forensic, Civil

13. Forensic, Criminal

14. New Technologies

15. Quantitative Modeling

16. Collaborative/Therapeutic Assessment

17. Recovery and Long-Term Outcomes

18. Other [indicate]

The following materials are required for all presentations: 

1. Presenter information (name, degree, affiliation, contact information, licensure information)

   • • A brief biography

     • CV (must be in English, abbreviated 1-2 page CVs are sufficient)

     • A brief (1-2 sentences) description of their expertise in the subject matter

     • Potential conflict of interest / commercial support

2. Presentation abstract (see the following sections for specific guidelines)

3. Keywords

4. Learning objectives (1-2 per presentation, 3-5 per symposium)

5. References (1-2 per presentation, 3-5 per symposium)

6. List of co-authors

For research presentations or posters, please adhere to the following guidelines. Paper presentation submissions will be given the opportunity in the submission process to elect that if the oral presentation is not accepted, then the abstract may be considered for poster presentation.

Abstract Length: The Abstract should be 250 to 500 words with no images, graphs, or tables.

Structural Components: Your abstract should include the following key components:

• • • Title: Include a descriptive title for your research presentation.

    • Brief Introduction: Provide a concise introduction to your research, outlining the context and significance of your work.

    • Method: Describe the methods and procedures used in your research. Please provide enough detail for reviewers to understand your research design.

    • Results or Planned Analyses: Summarize the key findings of your research or, in the case of ongoing work, the planned analyses and their potential implications.

    • Importance of this Study: Highlight the significance of your research in the broader field of multimethod assessment. Explain how your work contributes to the advancement of knowledge in the field. All research presentations must include a practice-oriented component regarding how the results can inform multimethod assessment.

    • Keywords: Include 3 to 5 keywords that accurately represent the content and focus of your research. Keywords help in categorizing and organizing submissions for the review process.

Formatting: Use APA guidelines. Ensure your abstract is well-structured, clear, and concise. References may be included if relevant, but a maximum of three.

Clarity and Precision: Write your abstract in a clear and concise manner. It should be comprehensible to a wide audience, including those who may not be experts in your specific field.

Review Process: All submissions will undergo a blind review process by at least two reviewers. Reviewers will assess the quality, relevance, and contributions of your research to the field.

R-PAS strongly encourages presentations on a variety of scientific topics and welcomes presentations on factors that have been understudied in multimethod assessments.

See Research-Based Abstract Example in the Abstract Examples page.

For case presentations or posters, please adhere to the following guidelines. Paper presentation submissions will be given the opportunity in the submission process to elect that if the oral presentation is not accepted, then the abstract may be considered for poster presentation.

Abstract Length: Your abstract should be between 250 and 500 words.

Structural Components: Your case presentation abstract should include the following key components:

• • • Title: Include a descriptive title for your case presentation.

    • Basic demographics and cultural context: Provide a brief description of the person who was assessed, including relevant demographic information and cultural context.

    • Referral/Assessment Question: Clearly state the primary reason for the assessment and the specific question(s) you aimed to address.

    • Brief Relevant History: Summarize the essential historical information relevant to the assessment, such as background, presenting issues, or contextual factors.

    • Tests Administered and Interpreted: List the psychological tests administered, including R-PAS.

    • General Purpose of R-PAS in the Assessment: Explain the overall purpose and anticipated utility of R-PAS in this assessment.

    • How R-PAS was Helpful: Describe how R-PAS contributed to the assessment process, providing insights, or aiding in diagnosis or treatment planning.

    • Keywords: Include 3 to 5 keywords that accurately represent the content and focus of your research. Keywords help in categorizing and organizing submissions for the review process.

Formatting: Use APA guidelines. Ensure your abstract is well-structured, clear, and concise. References may be included if relevant, but a maximum of three references.

Clarity and Precision: Write your abstract in a clear and concise manner. It should be comprehensible to a wide audience, including those who may not be experts in your specific field.

Review Process: All submissions will undergo a blind review process by at least two reviewers. Reviewers will assess the quality, relevance, and contributions of your case to the field.

See Case Presentation Abstract Example in the Abstract Examples page.

A Symposium at the 2nd Annual R-PAS Multimethod Assessment Conference 2025 is a 90-minute session with a structured format. Here are the format and guidelines for symposium submissions:

1.  Symposium Components:

• Symposia can consist of only case presentations, only research presentations, or a combination of case and research presentations. 

• Research symposia can consist of 3-4 presenters.

• Case symposia should consist of 2-3 presenters.

• Combined research and case symposia should consist of 3 presenters.

• A chair and a discussant.

2. Submission Requirements:

• Symposia proposals must include the overall symposium proposal and abstracts for each presentation.

• Individual abstracts for the symposium submissions should adhere to the same criteria as oral presentations. The symposium abstract itself must meet the following criteria:

  • • Integration of Presentations: The symposium abstract should seamlessly integrate all presentation topics within a single, coherent abstract.

    • Justification of Importance: Briefly justify the significance and relevance of the symposium, providing context for the audience.

    • Describe Presented Studies: Clearly and briefly describe each study that will be presented in the symposium.

    • The Symposium abstract and the abstracts for each presentation should be submitted together.

    • See Symposium Abstract Example in the Abstract Examples page.

    • See Case Presentation and Research-Based Abstract Examples in the Abstract Examples page. 

3. Chair's role

   1. • Each symposium must have one chair (can also be the discussant). If you need help finding a suitable chair, you can reach out to Joni Mihura at joni.mihura@utoledo.edu. 

      • The chair usually keeps the time and makes sure everyone is set up at the beginning. 

4. Discussant's role

• Each symposium must have one discussant (can also be the chair). If you need help finding a suitable discussant, you can reach out to Joni Mihura at joni.mihura@utoledo.edu. 

• The discussant's role is to lead the discussion and work as a possible mediator of discussion between presenters and the audience. The discussant usually discusses the group of papers at the end to tie the presentations together and then moderates the discussion. 

Roundtables offer a platform for a focused discussion on a specific topic related to R-PAS and multimethod assessment. They are especially suited for discussions on emerging research areas, clinical or ethical dilemmas, or complex scenarios where multiple perspectives can be invaluable. Each roundtable should have a designated moderator who will guide the discussion and a panel who bring diverse insights to the table. 

Topic Selection: The roundtable topic should be specific, relevant, and geared toward stimulating a lively discussion on R-PAS and its use in multimethod assessment.

Format: The panel can either be the main participants in the discussion coming from multiple perspectives or experiences. Or the panel can provide brief descriptions of the issues, expecting more participation from the audience.

Abstract Length: 250-500 words for the overall theme.

• For roundtables with multiple presentations, like the symposia, each presentation should also have an individual abstract of 250-500 words.

Structural Components of the Abstract:

• Title: Captivating and descriptive of the roundtable's focus.

• Introduction: Briefly describe the importance and relevance of the chosen topic.

• Objective: State the primary goals of the roundtable discussion.

• List of Participants: Each roundtable may have 3-5 participants. For each participant, include names, affiliations, and a brief (1-2 sentences) description of their expertise in the subject matter.

• Method: Outline how the discussion will be structured. Will there be individual presentations? Will there be designated times for audience participation?

• Implications for R-PAS: Explain how the discussion can contribute to the broader understanding of R-PAS and its clinical, forensic, and ethical application. Roundtables may also be used to discuss shared experiences using R-PAS in research, education, and/or practice.

• Keywords: 3-5 keywords that best represent the focus of the roundtable.

Review Process:

• • • Submissions will be reviewed for their relevance to the conference theme, potential for stimulating meaningful discussion, and diversity of participants' perspectives.

    • All submissions will undergo a blind review process by at least two reviewers. Reviewers will assess the importance, relevance, and potential contributions of the roundtable to the field.

These guidelines are designed to ensure a structured and engaging experience for presenters and attendees, promote diversity and collaboration, and maintain the quality and integrity of the conference sessions.