With the OBDD Grant, Columbia County worked with Vantage Point Solutions (VPS) to prepare a Broadband Feasibility Study. Key highlights from the study, as well as links to the full report are provided below. The study was broken up into 3 phases, listed below:
After the completion of the 3 phases above, an Executive Summary report was created that combined the information learned through the first 3 phases of the project, and offered recommendations for the County.
Vantage Point Solutions (VPS) collected data directly from each Provider’s site, as well as from multiple publicly available sources including BroadbandNow.com, Business.org, and Reviews.org. The data originated from information self-reported by the carriers to third party sites and is generally based on availability in an area rather than by individual addresses. As such, the data will not have pinpoint accuracy and should be used only as an overview.
At the time of data collection, Comcast was still implementing service to Rainier (97048), and would now be noted as a provider offering 25Mbps in that Zip Code. Limited data was available for Cascade Networks/Wave, which currently provides service to portions of 97016.
Overall, the self-reported data shows significant broadband coverage gaps, particularly in the 97016, 97054, and 97056 areas.
This second phase of the study primarily focused on conducting County, community and stakeholder outreach. Stakeholders represent key groups of potential end-users of a municipal network such as citizens, businesses and government agencies. The purpose of the outreach is to obtain feedback regarding current levels of service, future needs and concerns.
The primary outreach tools were a randomly selected household survey and an online business survey. Additional input was gained through a series of stakeholder group meetings, individual interviews, an informal online survey, and two town hall events.
Approximately 95% of respondents purchase internet services in some form in Columbia County. Almost 50% of those who do not purchase internet services indicated that internet was not available at their location. Other reasons for not purchasing internet included that an internet connection was too expensive (22%), or their family had no need for internet (9%). Just over 4% indicated that internet was simply too slow to purchase.
Around 22% of respondents answered that they purchase internet through a bundled package with phone and/or television so it’s difficult to determine how much they are paying just for internet.
It is important to note that 38% of respondents receive their service from Comcast. Just over 36% purchase service from Century Link with less than 14% purchasing internet services from Frontier Communications. The remaining 11% is made up of various providers with Hughes Net (4%) as the next most used provider.
Many respondents commented that they did not feel they had enough options in their respective areas.
*Note that these numbers are rounded to the nearest whole number. Charter Spectrum is the exception with only .22% in actuality.
*Note that these numbers are rounded to the nearest whole number
Approximately 38% of respondents are either very satisfied or satisfied with their current provider and approximately 38% of respondents saying they are dissatisfied or very dissatisfied with the current service as a whole from their internet provider. This leaves 25% who are neither satisfied nor dissatisfied. This level of satisfaction is well below average for what is typical.
As of the writing of the Report, the informal business survey had only collected 7 responses. As a result, the survey will be left open and VPS will work with the County to find better ways to promote the business survey. However, below we have provided a few pieces of information that give a sense of what businesses are experiencing in Columbia County.
o “Asked Comcast: $66,000 to get service run. Century Link wants a 3 year contract at $2,400/month for fiber.”
o “It should be cheaper, especially if you don’t have a bundle.”
Columbia County, in conjunction with Vantage Point Solutions (VPS) held two citizen town hall meetings in Vernonia and St. Helens. A take away from these meetings were that citizens were frustrated with their current services.
Vernonia Town Hall:
St. Helens Town Hall
VPS provided a variety of potential fiber network models, operational types, and funding mechanisms for this phase of the study. Their recommendation for Columbia County was to implement a middle mile* network that provides a redundant ring backbone connected to community anchor institutions and available for lease. They felt a middle-mile network was a good option for Columbia for the following reasons:
• There are already parts of the County that have adequate residential and business service and so a County-wide last-mile network is not needed;
• There is a middle-mile infrastructure problem County-wide in that there is not enough fiber in many areas to support a robust last mile network, cell service or create a redundant network to safeguard against fiber cuts;
• The County has potential opportunities to work with one or more last-mile provider partners to operate the network and increase last-mile services to areas where it is needed. In addition, in Columbia County, any network would need to begin with middle-mile infrastructure to support any future last-mile network builds.
*A Middle-Mile Network is typically defined as a network that serves community anchor institutions (i.e. Schools, libraries, government buildings, public safety agencies, hospitals, etc.) but does not directly serve homes and businesses.
Based on their data collection and analysis, VPS offered the following 3 recommendations for Columbia County:
Columbia County should consider building a middle-mile network. This could be done all at once or phased in over time.
The County should pursue establishing a partnership with a last-mile provider.
Columbia County should consider establishing a Columbia County Broadband Consortium that can focus on pursuing funding and establishing partnerships for middle-mile and last-mile network deployment.
For the full text of the project reports, see the More Info page.