Observed trend for Fig. 1: When you look at LiX, it has the highest ionic difference and electronegativity difference. Whereas you look at CsX, it has the lowest electronegativity and ionic difference. This means that when you increase ionic radii, it decreases electronegativity.
Observed trend for Fig. 2: When you increase electronegativity, the percent difference for K and Rb halides decreases. As the ionic character increases, so does the electronegativity, and the percent difference of experimental and theoretical lattice enthalpies decreases.
For Li and Na halides, the percent difference increases even though the electronegativity increases, observed in Fig. 2. This is mostly likely due to the ionic shape of the cation and anion. The small size of the cation and the strong forces of the anion causes the shape to change from the assumed spherical shape. This can cause inaccuracy and therefore increase the percent difference.
RQ: Investigating the effects of ionic radii and charge difference in experimental and theoretical lattice enthalpy values.
1. As ionic radii difference increases, so does the percent difference. But for Li and Na halides, there was inaccuracy in the result because of the unperfect spherical shape of the ion.
2. My hypothesis was not supported as seen in Fig.2. As ionic character increases, the electronegativity also increases, resulting in a decrease in percent difference. This could be because the compounds selected are more ionic than covalent.
The errors when conducting this experiment was the calculator. The rho (π) to calculate the theoretical lattice enthalpy values was 0.35. This could lead to some inaccuracies.
Moreover, the online database Wired Chemist was missing RbX and CsX halides. This could be a possible improvement. I would like to also use many online databases to better perform this experiment. Furthermore, using a wider range of halogens would produce a more reliable percent difference for each alkali metal.
Possible extension for this experiment could be to use one type of metal halide, for example, using silver. It could still observe the ionic difference between theoretical and experimental. Also, using a metal element would give a better result because of its covalent character.