Analyze How Authors Present Evidence Differently in Articles and Trash Vortex

< Go to Lesson 3

> Go to Lesson 5

Lesson Synopsis

1. Opening

A. Engage the Learner - W.7.1 (5 minutes)

2. Work Time

A. Read and Compare Evidence - RI.7.9 (15 minutes)

3. Closing and Assessment

A. Practice Debate - SL.7.3, SL.7.4 (25 minutes)

4. Homework

A. Prepare for Debate: Students use Homework: Prepare for Debate note-catcher to write an opening statement, draft cross-examination questions, consider counter-claims as a responder, or draft a summary to plan for their role in the final debate.

B. Independent Research Reading: Students read for at least 20 minutes in their independent research reading text. Then they select a prompt and write a response in their independent reading journal.

Daily Learning Targets

Lesson Prep

Lesson Plan

Opening

A. Engage the Learner – W.7.1 (5 minutes)

MEETING STUDENTS' NEEDS 

In Opening A, ensure students understand that the purpose of the QuickWrite is to generate an argument with claim, evidence, and reasoning in preparation for the debate in the following lesson. They should focus on their ideas, not their spelling, punctuation, or grammar. However, students may need additional time to process and articulate their ideas.

In Opening A, allow students to respond to the prompt in the modality that best suits them. They may want to record their responses in writing or practice their oral responses with a partner before sharing them out. They may want to share their responses in their home language. Allowing students to respond in multiple ways increases their confidence and success in articulating their ideas.

Also, as necessary, provide the Entrance Ticket: Unit 2, Lesson 4 ▲. This resource features sentence starters which support students with comprehension and writing. 

Work Time

A. Read and Compare Evidence - RI.7.9 (15 minutes)

"I can compare how two authors emphasize different evidence when presenting information on plastic pollution."

MEETING STUDENTS' NEEDS 

For Work Time A, explain to students that completing the analysis and note-catcher independently will prepare them for doing so on their assessment in the following lesson. Remind students that they have completed similar analysis and note-catchers throughout the unit and are prepared for this challenge.

At the end of Work Time A, collect students' questions in order to review them as a formative assessment to ensure students are ready for the mid-unit assessment in the following lesson. If not, spend another lesson on analyzing the authors' use of evidence.

Closing

A. Practice Debate - SL.7.3, SL.7.4 (25 minutes)

"I can delineate and evaluate a speaker's claims about plastic pollution."

"I can present my claims about plastic pollution in a clear way, supported by evidence."

MEETING STUDENTS' NEEDS  

In the next lesson, students will participate in a Language Dive using a sentence from the article "Boyan Slat: The Great Pacific Garbage Patch Kid." Provide ELLs with the Language Dive sentence ahead of time. Invite students to predict some of the questions that the Language Dive may ask. This will improve students' metacognition and challenge their awareness of the most interesting or meaningful elements of the sentence.

In the next lesson, students will participate in a Language Dive using a sentence from the article "Boyan Slat: The Great Pacific Garbage Patch Kid." Provide ELLs with the Language Dive sentence ahead of time. Encourage students to independently reflect on this sentence and its meaning before the next lesson. Students may also wish to use dictionaries to add any unknown vocabulary and meanings to their vocabulary logs.