Chemistry Education Research Graduate Student & PostDoc
Professional Development Conferences
(Miami University)

2013 Conference

Plenary Speakers & Workshop Leaders

Stacey Lowery Bretz, Miami University

Conference Organizer

Melanie Cooper, Clemson University

CER & Curriculum Development

     We now have a fairly large body of work from the learning sciences providing us with insights into how people learn; and from CER, we know what discipline specific difficulties students have with chemistry. However, it is quite surprising that relatively little of this understanding has made its way into the design of chemistry curricula offered at most colleges and universities. While there is much discussion of evidence based reform, most of these efforts are focused on incorporating "active learning" techniques, rather than redesigning the curriculum in light of evidence from research. This presentation will focus on the need for evidence based curriculum reform, the research findings that can guide such reforms, and how we might assess the results of these reforms.

Joseph Grabowski, National Science Foundation

NSF Mock Proposal Review Panels

You will be asked to read two proposals as if you were expected to make a recommendation to the National Science Foundation about funding.  What would you consider to be the proposal's strengths, weaknesses, suggestions? Participants will discuss their views in this workshop. You should bring notes on your thoughts with you to the workshop, but they will not be collected. You should plan to spend about 30 minutes reading each proposal, looking for the big picture, but not necessarily gaining command of all the small details.

Thomas Holme, Iowa State University & Director, ACS Exams Institute

Should What We Measure Surprise Us?

Classroom change is routinely accompanied by measures of student content learning, often ACS Exams. Chemistry Education Research often attempts to make sense of these measures of content knowledge within the context of the curricular or pedagogical practice change that was attempted. A key question worth asking is whether or not the content measure itself is providing information to the researcher in a useful form. This workshop will focus on measures of content knowledge from ACS exams and the nature of content knowledge measures broadly. Interactive investigation of how to adjudicate content knowledge accessed by students who perform the task will be conducted. Ways that this type of analysis can be incorporated into an emerging database of information about many years of ACS exam items will be explored as well.

Jennifer Lewis, University of South Florida

CER & Evaluation as a Career Choice

Chemistry education researchers often have the opportunity to engage in evaluation work in addition to conducting traditional educational research. If researchers choose to do evaluation work, it is best if they begin from an understanding of evaluation as a professional practice, with its own set of norms. This talk will discuss my career trajectory, including how evaluation became a central part of my professional portfolio, present some of the basic principles that guide evaluation practice, and present some examples of those principles enacted in my own work. Whether or not attendees are currently planning to engage in professional evaluation, the ideas in the talk also lend themselves to framing applied educational research projects.

Norb Pienta, University of Iowa & Editor-Elect, Journal of Chemical Education

Simulated CER Journal Reviews

Participants will be provided access to a short CER manuscript, read it, evaluate it, and submit their comments prior to arriving at the conference. After submitting a review, the user will be able to access the overall rating and the comments from fellow reviewers. During the workshop, the single-blind and double-blind review processes will be described. Reviews of the sample manuscripts will be discussed from the context of making an editorial decision and from the context of reading and interpreting reviews returned to the authors by the Journal. Facts and myths about publication in the Journal of Chemical Education will be discussed.

Marcy Towns, Purdue University

Research across Disciplinary Boundaries

Within DBER there are disciplinary boundaries which researchers can cross in order to discover the interesting ways our colleagues outside of chemistry discuss the same concepts. For example, mathematics is used in every science discipline. In the thermodynamics section of a physical chemistry course the language of calculus is used to describe chemical systems. However, the same content in covered in a thermal physics course in the physics department. Do faculty in chemistry, physics, and mathematics talk about partial derivatives or total differentials in the same way? What differences exist? What challenges might be posed to students who take calculus and are subsequently required to use these skills in chemistry or physics courses?

There is enormous value in interdisciplinary research from the standpoint of sharing frameworks, data collection, analytical approaches, and findings that span the disciplines. This presentation will highlight some areas of interdisciplinary research and help young researchers consider how their research projects or interests might span the disciplines.


Ellen Yezierski, Miami University

Moderator, Q&A Panel Discussion


Graduate Students & PostDoc Attendees

Shannon Anderson, Ph.D. Candidate, North Dakota State University (Advisor: Erika Offerdahl)

Patterns of Student Reasoning with Solving Structures from Organic Spectra

Problem solving in the context of organic spectroscopy is somewhat unique in that it is highly dependent on students' abilities to accurately interpret expert-like external representations.  Students must successfully decode key features of organic spectra and access underlying principles of spectroscopy before solving structures. We interviewed twenty students enrolled in the second sequence of organic chemistry at two universities.  Students primarily solved structures from H-1 NMR spectra, with supporting C-13, IR, and Mass spectra provided later in the interview.   Preliminary data depicting the phases of problem solving and patterns of student reasoning while interpreting organic spectra will be presented.

Mary Beth Anzovino, Ph.D. Candidate, University of Wisconsin-Madison (Adivsor: John Moore)

From the Bench to the Blackboard: Development of Undergraduate Lab Experiments and a Survey Instrument

Can we positively impact students' perceptions of and attitudes toward scientific research through the incorporation of research-based experiments in the undergraduate laboratory courses? Experiments are designed to incorporate content from research laboratories while remaining intellectually accessible to younger undergraduate students and feasible to perform in teaching laboratory settings. A survey instrument to assess students' atittudes and perceptions before and after completing the laboratory activities is being developed. Numerous survey instruments exist to assess individuals' perceptions of science; however, this library does not include a valid, reliable survey to measure individuals' perceptions of and attitudes toward scientific research.

Janelle Arjoon, Ph.D. Candidate, University of South Florida (Advisor: Jennifer Lewis)

Examining the Relationship among Self-efficacy, Self-concept, and the Retention of College General Chemistry Students

The first year of college is a critical time for students as this is when many students leave the sciences. Even those students who pass general chemistry may not remain in science. Self-efficacy and self-concept have been found to be important for student success, and may also be important for retention in science. However, these factors have not been simultaneously investigated for college chemistry students. This proposed study investigates the relationship among self-efficacy, self-concept, and student retention in science. Findings are expected to be useful for instructors who wish to measure and work towards improving students' low self-efficacy or self-concept.

Ashley Augspurger, Ph.D. Candidate, Iowa State University (Advisor: Tom Greenbowe)

Optical Microscopy in an Undergraduate Instrumental Analysis Laboratory Course

Optical microscopy is an often forgot area of instrumentation in undergraduate analytical curriculum, but an area that chemical industry expects bench chemists to already know. This research study aims to create an effective optical microscopy laboratory experiment for an upper level undergraduate instrumental analysis laboratory course. Traditional and inquiry based laboratory experiments were created to compare which format helps students learn optical microscopy better.  An assessment was created on optical microscopy to monitoring student learning. A pilot study was conducted in, spring 2013, with students who had already taken an instrumental analysis course.

John Baluyut, Ph.D. Candidate, Iowa State University (Advisor: Tom Holme)

Strategies Used by General Chemistry Students in Solving Conceptual Problems in Stoichiometry

Think-aloud sessions were conducted with 18 students coming from regular and advanced general chemistry courses during the fall semester of 2012. Particulate-type problems were given to identify strategies students use when asked to solve problems in stoichiometry that are presented in a conceptual manner. Initial analysis of the session transcripts indicate no clear distinctions between problem-solving strategies used by students coming from regular and advanced courses in general chemistry. These strategies, along with common errors students commit as a result thereof, will be used to develop a strategy inventory instrument.

Senetta Bancroft, Ph.D. Candidate, University of Akron (Advisor: Nidaa Makki)

An Examination of Underrepresented Minority Experiences in Physical Science Doctoral Programs: Currere as a Tool for McNair Scholars' Construction of the Academic Self

The overarching purpose of this work-in-progress is to obtain a thick description of how race may be reflected in doctoral students' academic experiences. I seek to understand the relationship between former McNair scholars' curriculum, as defined by Pinar and Grumet (1976), interactions in their chemistry doctoral programs, and their perceived ability to persist in their program. Further, I will explore Pinar's (1975) currere as a tool to uncover the complex nature of past and anticipated academic experiences on those of the present. Finally, I will explore how these complexities become evident to the participants and influences on participants' academic self-construct.  

Spencer Berger, Ph.D. Candidate, University of California, Berkeley (Advisor: Angelica Stacy)

Investigating Student Approaches to Learning in the Chemistry Laboratory

Students enrolled in introductory chemistry at a large public university were interviewed at three time-points spanning the semester about their experiences in the laboratory.  From an analysis of the interviews, a framework describing student approaches to learning chemistry in the laboratory was developed.  Four categories emerged that describe student approaches to learning chemistry:  beliefs about learning in the laboratory, working through laboratory procedures, evaluating data, and questions asked of peers/graduate student instructors.

Since many students reported following procedures without making connections to molecular level chemistry, a follow-up study was performed to examine the effects of an intervention.  Students in selected laboratory sections completed worksheets aimed at encouraging them to think about the atomic level models related to the procedures during two laboratory periods.  Students in the experimental sections performed better on a laboratory exam than the control group, and the results were significant at the 5% level.

Allie Brandriet, Ph.D. Candidate, Miami University (Advisor: Stacey Lowery Bretz)

Analysis of the Redox Concept Inventory (ROXCI) as a Measure of Student Understanding of Particulate and Symbolic Oxidation-Reduction Concepts

Students lack a firm understanding of a topic usually taught during the first semester of general chemistry: oxidation-reduction reactions (redox). Although students construct knowledge from the data obtained by their senses, many textbooks and teachers focus heavily on symbolic equations and rules for determining oxidation numbers as the tools for learning redox concepts. Students can be left with memorized definitions, a superficial understanding and alternate conceptions about a complex topic that has a strong particulate foundation. In order to elicit student ideas about redox on a large scale, the Redox Concept Inventory (ROXCI) was created based on 39 semi-structured interviews with undergraduate students. Preliminary data was collected from general and organic chemistry students (N=438) in the fall of 2012 using the alpha version of the ROXCI. Based on the results of the statistical and qualitative analysis of the alpha version, revisions were made to create the beta version of the ROXCI. A confidence scale has been added to each question in order to distinguish between genuine alternative conceptions and guessing due to a lack of understanding. This poster will describe the results of the beta test and how the decisions were made for revising the alpha version based on quantitative and qualitative data collected.

Nikita Burrows, Ph.D. Candidate, Georgia State University (Advisor: Suazette Mooring)

Student Understanding of General Chemistry Concepts and their Success in Organic Chemistry

Key principles are often developed in General Chemistry (Gen-Chem) and carried into other chemistry courses such as organic chemistry (O-Chem). A survey of chemistry faculty (N = 85) revealed that the top three Gen-Chem topics considered to be vital to the success in O-Chem are Lewis structures, Valence Shell Electron Pair Repulsion (VSEPR) theory and the acid/base behavior of molecules. These key topics are the core of O-Chem for prediction of how and why molecules react. This study reports the outcomes of an investigation of O-Chem students' conceptual understanding of these three general chemistry topics and their application to problem solving of conceptual Gen-Chem questions.

Lindsey Cain, Ph.D. Candidate, Clemson University (Advisor: Dr. Gautam Bhattacharyya)

Understanding how Inorganic Chemistry Graduate Students Conduct their Research

Anecdotal data from previous research has shown that graduate students fail to incorporate classroom knowledge into their research. Although the anecdotal did show an atheoretical approach to their research, the graduate students were still getting their research done. This current project branched off of that research and is a case study focusing on how three inorganic chemistry graduate students at Clemson University conduct their research.  The case study was conducted during the fall of 2010, which consisted of an interview every week and focused on what they did that particular week in their research. The results from this study displayed that the difficulties these graduate students encountered in their research began with how they conducted their literature search. Three themes emerged from this study. After inputting a topic or molecular structure into the search engine the abundance of "hits" meant the protocol would work for their research. Often times if their exact molecule was not reported, they would select a protocol based on similar surface features. If their molecule had not been reported then they had a difficult time interpreting their results.

Deborah Carlisle, Ph.D. Candidate, University of Massachusetts Amherst (Advisor: Martina Nieswandt)

Spatial Reasoning in Organic Chemistry: The Missing Links

This study was an effort to better understand the development and application of three-dimensional skills in chemistry. A very important aspect of this research was to identify specific applications of spatial skills throughout a year-long organic chemistry course. This study observes students who specifically identify with the subject of chemistry, as it is a course for majors only. The goal of this research is to better inform instruction for teaching spatial reasoning skills, and to consider how to strengthen them at the general chemistry level. Taught strategies were compared to strategies used by students during group work and interviews.

Justin Carmel, Ph.D. Candidate, Miami University (Advisor: Ellen Yezierski)

Investigating Growth in Scientific Reasoning in a Chemistry Course for Non-Science Majors

An aim of liberal education is to develop students' intellectual and practical skills for the real-world, one being critical thinking.  In chemistry, the most-valued dimension of critical thinking is scientific reasoning (SR): students' ability to examine data and make inferences about what outcomes are or should be.  This study examines students' SR skills in a chemistry class for non-science majors. The Lawson Classroom Test of Scientific Reasoning (LCTSR), administered pre- and post-course, generated data describing students' SR ability and growth in SR. Results describing the growth in treatment and control groups will be presented with a description of the interventions comprising the treatment.

Julia Chan, Ph.D. Candidate, University of New Hampshire (Advisor: Chris Bauer)

A Longitudinal Study on the Effect of College Students' Attitude, Self-Concept, and Motivation on their Achievement in Chemistry

Past studies have shown students' attitudes, self-concepts, and motivation to be closely related to their academic performance in general and organic chemistry. This study will longitudinally monitor the change in affective characteristics of students throughout the two gateway chemistry courses via self-reported surveys and follow up with student interviews. Furthermore, we will investigate the effect of various aspects of students' affective characteristics on their academic performance at different time points throughout the semester via content exams. The study will provide new insights about the "at-risk" group, and may lead to developing effective interventions to help students be more successful.

Leah Corley, Ph.D. Candidate, Michigan State University (Advisor: Melanie Cooper)

Investigating Students' Understanding of Intermolecular Forces: A Longitudinal Assessment

The topic of intermolecular forces (IMFs) can be a particularly difficult subject for students. IMFs play an important role, however, in determining physical properties of a substance such as boiling or melting point. This presentation shows the results of a longitudinal study in which the effectiveness of a new general chemistry curriculum, Chemistry, Life, the Universe and Everything (CLUE), on students' understanding of IMFs was assessed after completion of both general and organic chemistry. Students were tracked over this time period using a free-form IMFs assessment in which they were allowed to draw representations of IMFs on the molecular level.

Kelley Current, Ph.D. Candidate, Western Michigan University (Advisor: Megan Grunert)

A Description of the Linguistic Teaching Practices of Graduate Teaching Assistants within a Shifting Curriculum

This study seeks to document and compare the in-class linguistic teaching practices of general chemistry laboratory instructors within: (1) traditional laboratories, (2) problem-based learning laboratories. There is a push for the usage of a student centered curricula, but mechanisms capable of aiding teachers in aligning their teaching practices with student centered curricula are unclear. We aim to document the linguistic teaching practices of instructors as the curriculum shifts and as support meetings are conducted. It is hoped that the support meetings will to assists instructors in aligning their teaching practices with the student centered curriculum.

Brittland DeKorver, Ph.D. Candidate, Purdue University (Advisor: Marcy Towns)

Predictions as Assessment of Conceptual Learning during Chemical Demonstrations

Chemical demonstrations are a popular teaching tool in both classroom settings and informal science education. However, demonstrations alone have been shown to be largely ineffective at teaching science concepts.(1,2) Asking students to make predictions has been shown to increase the audience's learning of science concepts, but the evaluation of learning in these studies required using pre- and post- concept inventory exams.(3) This method is time consuming in the classroom and would be impractical for informal science educators. Fusion Science Theater has developed a technique for presenting demonstrations in which the audience's pre- and post- lesson predictions become the assessment. Embedded assessments integrated within the demonstration allow measurement of the audience's learning without disrupting their engagement in the educational activity(4) and are a practical way for the demonstrator to evaluate the cognitive impact of his or her demonstration. The assessment then also serves to increase interest and emotional investment in the demonstration and enjoyment and satisfaction at the outcome of the demonstration and process of learning science concepts. This poster will discuss the development of an embedded assessment for a demonstration show featuring the popular chemical demonstration wherein various solutions are tested for electrolytes using a conductivity probe. Results showing increased conceptual knowledge and increased interest in learning among elementary school students will be presented. [1) Milner-Bolotin, M., Kotlicki, & Rieger, G. (2007). The Journal of College Science Teaching, 36, (4), 45-49. 2) Sokoloff, D. R., & Thornton, R. K. (1997) The Physics Teacher, 35, 340-346. 3) Crouch, C. H., Fagen, A. P., Callan, J. P., & Mazur, E. (2004). American Journal of Physics. 72, 835-838. 4) Shute, V. J., Ventura, M., Bauer, M. I., & Zapata-Rivera, D. (2009). In U. Ritterfeld, M. J. Cody, & P. Vorderer (Eds.), The Social Science of Serious Games: Theories and Applications. Philadelphia, PA: Routledge/LEA.]

Kelli Galloway, Ph.D. Candidate, Miami University (Advisor: Stacey Lowery Bretz)

MLILI: Assessment of Meaningful Learning in the Undergraduate Chemistry Laboratory

Review of research on laboratory learning demonstrates the need to understand student perspectives in order to improve laboratory teaching and learning. Novak's Theory of Meaningful Learning states that the cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains must be integrated for meaningful learning to occur. The psychomotor domain is inherent in the chemistry laboratory but the same is not true for the cognitive and affective domains. For meaningful learning to occur in the laboratory, students must actively integrate both the cognitive domain and the affective domains into the "doing" of their laboratory work. The Meaningful Learning in the Laboratory Inventory (MLILI) was designed to measure students' cognitive and affective expectations and experiences within the context of conducting experiments in the undergraduate chemistry laboratory. MLILI has been pilot tested with general, organic, and physical chemistry students at both a large Midwestern research university and a moderate size Midwestern liberal arts university. Analysis of the data was carried out in three ways. The structure of the inventory was examined through both factor analysis and cluster analysis. The theoretical framework of meaningful learning was also used as a lens to look for patterns in student responses with regard to cognitive and/or affective learning.

Jordan Harshman, Ph.D. Candidate, Miami University (Advisor: Ellen Yezierski)

Investigating how Chemistry Teachers use Assessment Results to Inform their Practice

Formative assessment research clearly suggests that teachers should inform classroom decisions via results of assessment, but the details describing this process are largely missing. Interviews were conducted using a protocol based on the Assessment as Inquiry framework designed to elicit how chemistry teachers' practice is guided by assessment results. This novel interview approach probes teachers' ideas about their own chemistry assessments and resulting student data, providing opportunities for personal reflection. Interviews are also dependent on the chemistry content assessed by the teacher, as pre-requisite knowledge plays an important part of the interpretation process. Results presented will include specific ways in which teachers make instructional decisions based on various formative assessments in their classroom.

Morgan Hawker, Ph.D. Candidate, Colorado State University (Advisor: Dawn Rickey)

Accuracy of General Chemistry Students' Exam Score Postdictions and its Relationship to Exam Performance

Metacognitive monitoring skills are important for students to develop for the purposes of self-evaluation. In this study, over 1000 general chemistry students were asked, as the final question on each exam, to postdict their scores. I will present results regarding the accuracy of students' postdictions and the reasoning behind making these judgments. The relationships between postdiction, postdiction reasoning, and performance will be explored within a general chemistry exam setting. This exploration will be framed in the context of student metacognitive monitoring.

Lisa Kendhammer, Ph.D. Candidate, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee (Advisor: Kristen Murphy)

Examining Students' Problem Solving Pathways on Items that Exhibited Potential Differential Item Functioning

When giving graded assessments one has the responsibility of making sure those assessments are fair and valid. There are several ways to do this and one way includes Differential Item Functioning (DIF). Items that were found to have persistent possible gender DIF were including on semi-structured interviews as well as questions that were found to have no gender DIF to explore how students are solving both types of problems. The interviews were conducted using an eye tracking instrument as well as recorded to ensure both quantitative and qualitative data was collected. The results from this interview will be presented.

Alexey Leontyev, Ph.D. Candidate, University of Northern Colorado (Advisor: Richard Hyslop)

Misconceptions in Stereochemistry

Information about students' misconceptions was gathered from multiple quizzes and student interviews. Several misconceptions were identified and were confirmed in multiple settings. For example, misconceptions such as the attribution of R- and S- configuration to the sign of light rotation were present in 25% of students. Forty percent of students think that enantiomers can be separated by standard laboratory techniques such as distillation, recrystallization or extraction. Also, many students have a fundamental misunderstanding of the nature of plane-polarized light, leading to the fundamental misinterpretation of a stereochemistry. Detailed findings from this project will be present at the meeting.

Yujuan Liu, Ph.D. Candidate, University of South Florida (Advisor: Jennifer Lewis)

Academic Motivational Scale Examined: Motivational Structure of College-Level General Chemistry Students

Based on self-determination theory, the Academic Motivation Scale (AMS) was used for the first time to examine student motivation toward education in introductory college chemistry courses. Self-reported scores from the AMS assess amotivation, extrinsic motivation, and intrinsic motivation. Psychometric evaluation showed the data had good internal consistency reliability and internal structure validity. An overall sex effect was found by multivariate analysis of variance; further analysis showed males scored significantly higher on amotivation with medium effect size. The findings are valuable for instructors interested in learning about their students' academic motivation in order to help students with different motivation types.

Michael Mack, Ph.D. Candidate, Purdue University (Advisor: Marcy Towns)

Review of Educational Research of Thermodynamics for Physical Chemistry

The 2014 CERP special issue calls for a review of physical chemistry education research. Our work builds on an existing review by examining research on the teaching and learning of thermodynamics in the physical chemistry classroom. We discuss theoretical and methodological approaches in previous studies to assess the state of education research in the physical chemistry classroom. Gaps in the literature and directions for new research in upper-division chemistry courses in line with recommendations from the DBER report will be discussed. This review will include a synthesis of results from previous research with implications for teaching.

Alena Moon, Ph.D. Candidate, Purdue University (Advisor: Marcy Towns)

Argumentation Practices in Physical Chemistry POGIL Class

Engaging in argumentation that requires students to build concepts and defend them is an effective way of developing scientific reasoning skills in students. The POGIL physical chemistry curriculum provides a platform for providing these argumentation opportunities in the classroom. This research aims to understand and evaluate students' arguing skills and the conceptual change that accompanies such argumentation practices. Small groups and whole class interactions were videotaped and transcribed. These transcriptions will be analyzed and coded according to Toulmin's model of argumentation, a model that identifies components of effective arguments.

Marc Muniz, Ph.D. Candidate, North Carolina State University (Advisor: Maria Oliver-Hoyo)

Teaching Tools for Pedagogy at the Nanoscale: Towards the Understanding of Concepts through Experience and Experimentation

The development of new instructional materials for nanoscale pedagogy is necessary, as the existing literature in undergraduate nanochemistry education does not provide instructors with adequate resources to help students make connections between core scientific concepts and those pertinent to the nanoscale. We aim to treat nanoscale phenomena not as a niche subject but as an educationally rich portion of chemistry at the interface of discrete and bulk structures. To accomplish this, we are developing flexible instructional materials based on a theoretical framework for analogy and similarity that will fit directly into the chemistry curriculum.

Schetema Nealy, Ph.D. Candidate, University of Nevada Las Vegas (Advisor: MaryKay Orgill)

Developing a High Quality Professional Development Module Focused on the Redox chemistry of Thermophiles and How It Relates to NASA's Mars Mission

NASA's Education website is a resource for of ready-to-use teaching materials relevant to NASA's missions for K-12 teachers. Of the educational materials on this website, less than 2% contain chemistry related materials. This project provides a high quality professional development module for the Tengchong P.I.R.E. project that will teach how redox chemistry is vital for thermophile survival and relates this to NASA's Mars mission. The module will include hands-on, inquiry-based lessons and activities, align with the Next Generation Science Standards, and be designed such that it can be posted on the NASA Education website for use in K-12 classroom environments.

Sara Nielsen, Ph.D. Candidate, Miami University (Advisor: Ellen Yezierski)

Chemistry Self-Concept, Chemistry Achievement, and Instructional Methods in High School Classrooms: A Longitudinal Study

In this pilot study, we studied the relationships among chemistry self-concept, measured by the Chemistry Self-Concept Inventory; student achievement, measured by chemistry quizzes; and instructional methods and quality, measured by the Reformed Teaching Observation Protocol. The quantitative methods addressed research questions aimed to determine the relationships among each of the determinants in the high school population. The qualitative methods served in finding the link between specific instructional methods and chemistry self-concept. The results of six rounds of data collection and analysis will be presented.

Stephanie Philipp, Postdoctoral Research Scholar, Miami University (Advisor: Ellen Yezierski)

Development of Peer Learning Assistance Skills in General Chemistry Undergraduate Teaching Assistants

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the development of peer learning assistance skills by six prepared and supported undergraduate teaching assistants (UTAs) leading recitation sections in a large general chemistry course.  This study triangulated results from CHEM 201 students’ responses to a course experience survey, UTAs’ bi-monthly reflections on their practice, and external observations of UTA preparation and practice by senior instructors and the researcher.  Principal components analysis revealed that the survey measured two factors related to peer learning assistance skills: TA Impact on Student Academic Success and TA Rapport-Building Skills.  Students (n = 210) in UTA-led recitation sections rated their TAs significantly higher (p < .05) on both factors than students (n=201) in traditional graduate teaching assistant-led recitation sections.  This computed to be an effect size of d = .53 for TA Impact and d = 0.38 for TA Rapport.  UTA reflections focused on successes and a few disappointments experienced when employing newly-acquired questioning skills, metacognitive strategies, and formative assessment techniques to engage students in learning.  UTAs were motivated to improve their peer learning assistance skills to “be a better TA for our students than the TAs we had in general chemistry.”  From observing and working with UTAs, researcher and senior instructors confirmed that UTAs were increasingly employing improved peer learning assistance skills with their students.

Jessica Reed, Ph.D. Candidate, Iowa State University (Advisor: Tom Holme)

General Chemistry Instructors' Learning Goals: Differences between Research Institutions, Community Colleges, and Dual-Enrollment High Schools

Students in Iowa are often able to take a general chemistry course at their local high school or community college, and then receive credit for the course when they attend a large state-funded university. While the course content is similar, there is anecdotal evidence to suggest that students may not have equivalent experiences in terms of development of non-content skills. This poster will present a qualitative study that examines learning goals in general chemistry courses taught in different learning environments. Analysis of qualitative data as well as plans for future quantitative studies will be presented.

Aracelis Janelle Scharon, Ph.D. Candidate, Illinois Institute of Technology (Advisor: Dan Meyer)

Novice High School Science Teachers: Lesson Plan Adaptations

Science teachers may be more adept or influenced to engage in lesson plan adaptations, because of their pedagogical content knowledge, knowledge structures or schemata related to the classroom. However, there is limited understanding of secondary science lesson plan adaptations during early in-service years, decision-making, and adaptation as a process unrelated to a specific curriculum focus (e.g. Beyer, & Davis, 2009; Forbes, 2010; Duncan, Pilitsis, & Piegaro; 2010). This study offers insights that may afford teacher coaching staff and curriculum development writers a lens into how chemistry teachers adapt science lesson plans, and the decisions that influence a teacher's course of action.

Lianne Schroeder, Ph.D. Candidate, University of Illinois Chicago (Advisors: Dr. Donald Wink & Dr. James Pellegrin)

CMS Survey Tool as Method for Data Collection and Pedagogical Implications

Large enrollment courses present challenges with regards to timely student feedback and adjustments to instructing. In an organic/biochemistry survey course, we used the survey component of our course management system (CMS) to provide weekly student feedback to the instructor. Further, the use of the CMS provided a method for collecting data on student resource use. Data was analyzed for patterns of student resource use. We will discuss the utility of this method of data collection and potential implications of the data analysis for semester-to-semester course improvements. Feedback from the instructor on the utility of this approach will be presented.

Charles Seo, Ph.D. Candidate, California State University, Los Angeles (Advisor: James Rudd)

Effects of Implementing an Inquiry-Based Laboratory Curriculum on Students' Understanding of Science and Attitudes toward Science

The purpose of this study is to develop and implement an inquiry-based laboratory curriculum in order to study its effects on student learning of science concepts, their perception of the nature of science, and their attitudes towards science. The curriculum will be designed in such a way as to incrementally expose students to inquiry-based laboratory activities throughout the duration of the course. We hope that our findings provide insight into curriculum modification and evidence that inquiry laboratory activities promote greater student learning than traditional laboratory activities.

R. Thomas Smith, M.S. Candidate, Miami University (Advisor: Ellen Yezierski)

Uncovering the Pedagogical Content Knowledge of High School Chemistry Teachers

Pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) is a complex and multi-faceted concept that is linked to exemplary teaching, but one in which there is few ways to observe and document. This study proposes a four-stage method to close gaps in observing and documenting PCK. A pilot study was conducted using this method focusing on acid/base instruction, a topic in which literature on topic specific PCK is present. Results from the pilot study as well as a comparison between current literature will be presented.

Shalini Srinivasan, Ph.D. Candidate, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee (Advisor: Kristen Murphy)

Developing and Preliminary Testing of a Persistence Instrument: Measuring Self-Efficacy

Designing a robust model for persistence begins with the development of an instrument to measure student self-efficacy in general chemistry (a gateway course for STEM majors). Items in this instrument were tailored to be domain-specific and allowed students to judge their perceived confidence levels while performing chemistry related tasks. The instrument was administered via paper and online formats; preliminary results were analyzed using factor analysis. Pre- and post-administrations of the instrument suggest that it captures meaningful data related to self-efficacy and these measures change over the course of a single semester. Ongoing refinements and further administrations of the instrument, in conjunction with the development and testing of an outcome expectations instrument, are warranted to validate and test a complete persistence instrument for STEM students.

Hannah Sturtevant, Ph.D. Candidate, Purdue University (Advisor: Gabriela Weaver)

Implementation and Evaluation of a Hybrid SCALE-UP Method for Larger Undergraduate Chemistry Courses

Research has shown that active problem-solving in a collaborative environment supports more effective learning than lecturing alone. Student-Centered Active Learning Environment for Undergraduate Programs (SCALE-UP) is a successfully developed model for classroom use. In this project, a large-classroom hybrid approach to SCALE-UP was implemented in a second semester general chemistry course at a large Midwestern university. Students' ACS general chemistry exam scores from both semesters were compared, with students in the hybrid course performing significantly better. Qualitative data were collected with end-of-semester surveys. The course design and overall results, with emphasis on the qualitative results, of this study are presented.

Jaclyn Trate, Ph.D. Candidate, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee (Advisor: Kristen Murphy)

Integrating Scale Themed Instruction into the Undergraduate Chemistry Curriculum

The American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) has outlined four themes that define science literacy; these are systems, models, constancy and change, and scale. Of these themes, scale is the only one not specifically addressed in K-12 curriculum. Our research has already shown that scale literacy is a better predictor for success in an introductory chemistry course than traditional measures and we have already begun to design and integrate scale-themed instruction in the general chemistry curriculum. New materials for both lecture and laboratory have been created and implemented. The continuing results of both experiments will be presented.

Mary van Opstal, Ph.D. Candidate, Loyola University Chicago (Advisor: Patrick Daubenmire)

An Ongoing Analysis of Metacognition in Chemistry Majors through the Use of the Scientific Writing Heuristic as an Explicit Tool to Teach Metacognitive Strategies in the Instructional Laboratory

This project tested how an established instructional strategy, the Science Writing Heuristic (SWH), could be used to teach metacognitive strategies in the undergraduate chemistry laboratory. General chemistry majors participated in a semester long study where they were instructed in a traditional lab setting (non-SWH) or in an inquiry lab setting (SWH). In a mixed methods approach, students' perceptions of their metacognition were explored and identified through interviews and student writing.  At the same time, scores on the MCAI and ACS content exams were repeated measures of students' perceptions of their learning and academic achievement.

Jon Velasco, Ph.D. Candidate, University of Nebraska Lincoln (Advisor: Marilyne Stains)

Investigating the Tutor-Learning Effect: Identification of Predictors of Tutors' Productive Behaviors

This study looks at the interconnection between tutor perceptions of tutoring, behaviors displayed in a tutoring session, and tutor learning during the session. The researchers have carried out interviews with privately-hired tutors to identify major themes in tutor perception. Tutoring sessions have also been observed to classify tutor behaviors in a typical session, and tutor learning is monitored by comparison of Pathfinder networks before and after tutoring sessions. A cluster analysis has shown four sets of overall tutor perceptions, and preliminary analysis of tutoring sessions show some correlation between perceptions and behavior.

Ashley Versprille, Ph.D. Candidate, Purdue University (Advisor: Marcy Towns)

General Chemistry Students' Understanding of Climate Science Principles Relating to Chemistry

As part of the NSF funded Visualizing the Chemistry of Climate Science project, we are developing a chemistry and climate science diagnostic instrument for use in general chemistry courses. We based our interview protocol on misconceptions identified in previous literature. Twenty-four freshmen students have been interviewed to elicit their understanding of climate science and the chemistry underlying climate science. Our analysis and findings indicate that the fundamental chemistry necessary to understand the Earth's energy system and climate change are not well understood by the undergraduates in this sample. Details of the interviews, analysis, and synthesis of findings will be shared.

Adrian Villalta-Cerdas, Ph.D. Candidate, University of South Florida (Advisor: Santiago Sandi-Urena)

Use of Problem Solving to Elicit Self-Explaining in General Chemistry

Research findings in educational psychology have shown that implementing activities that elicit self-explaining improves learning and enhances authentic learning in the sciences. Self-explaining refers to the student's generation of inferences about causal connections between objects and events. This study focuses on an experience closer to doing science by presenting a familiar phenomenon to the participants and a fact that would potentially induce cognitive imbalance to then prompt them to self-explain. Preliminary results suggest that, in the context of large-enrollment general-chemistry courses, self-explaining engagement is influenced by prompts and deeper engagement is associated with improved understanding of the concepts at hand.

Melissa Weinrich, Ph.D. Candidate, University of Arizona (Advisor: Vicente Talanquer)

Understanding Chemical Synthesis: From Novice to Expert Student

The purpose of our research was to identify how students at different levels of expertise make judgments about the feasibility of chemical reactions and build explanations about how to synthesize a chemical product. We have used a qualitative research approach based on individual interviews with college general chemistry (N=15), organic (N=15), first year graduate (N=14) students, and PhD candidates (N=15). Interview transcripts have been analyzed to elicit the sophistication and depth of the students' explanations. Our results show a great variability in the cognitive resources used by these students. The specific nature of the task also strongly affected students' reasoning.

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 0733642. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.