I am a mom, wife, gardener, nature lover and educator. I am a life long learner that is so very passionate about teaching and learning. I believe EVERYONE can learn. I also believe we (as a system) have a lot of unlearning to do to meet the diverse needs of our learners in today's classrooms.
As part of my own learning journey towards understanding Universal Design for Learning, I have committed to my own reflection, identification of areas of strengths, as well as, areas I need to grow in. Understanding this framework, how it applies to the work I do, and how best to share my learning is my the purpose for this blog and website.
This blog reflects my thinking on this day. It is here that I reflect on my learning journey and share my thoughts, ponderings and wonderings. I hope I can inspire and motivate you too.
Today is the day when I put what I have been preaching for the last 2 years into practice. I would like to have a dollar for every time I said "UDL" - I would be more than rich. Universal Design for Learning. It's not a buzz word. It's not another thing to add to the proverbial teaching plate. It is a mindset and a set of beliefs that become your practice.
I am ready
Improper Fractions. This is the lesson, this is the place I will begin my UDL journey. Well, begin putting my understanding of UDL into practice. For the last two years, I have been learning about UDL, reading about UDL, listening to understand UDL, talking about UDL, thinking, pondering and wondering about UDL. Today, I will put it all together and DO UDL. I am nervous.
After being out of the classroom for the last two years in a program specialist role, I now have my own class, my own set of learners. I knew it was this year that I had to walk the talk of UDL. For the last few months, I kept coming up with excuses of why I couldn't start it; I didn't have time to plan it, the class wasn't ready, the list of excuses continues. Truth - I wasn't ready. It was so easy for me to walk in that Grade 6 math classroom and pull a lesson out of my pocket and 'wing it'. I have taught this course for many years and know the curriculum like the back of my hand. It was easy. No work involved. I mean us teachers are so busy that easy is the way to go. Who has time? Why reinvent the wheel? Why do something different when 'easy' works? Right?
WAITTTTTTTT. What? Who is this person? Reality check. It was a harsh reality check.
Then .... Covid. Omicrom. Virtual learning 3.0.
After two weeks of online learning, the first for me as a teacher, I knew my old bag of tricks was not going to suffice. I had reverted back to my old teacher self - the one I thought died years ago - the talk at learners, the show and tell teacher, the do as I say teacher, the do the same problem teacher. OMG. This had to stop. I knew the time was now.
But where do I start? What do I do? How do I do this? Breathe.
As with any new learning, the very first thing one must do is to devote the time it will take for this new learning to occur. First step - commit time to plan. Done. (A rainy and windy Saturday helps). Second, be open to a new way of doing. Third, gather and organize necessary resources. (Time to start using the million files and documents I have gathered over the last 2 years). Being a Type A personality kind, I need to have structure, and a step by step "How To". Thank you Katie Novak for all your work in creating a very easy to use and understand document entitled "Guidelines for Designing a UDL Lesson." This was what I needed to begin. So, I did.
I just started. I began by thinking about my learners and everything I knew about them. I debunked the idea of each having a particular learning style (Oh, he is a visual learner) after reading a great article by Katie Novak. My thoughts then move to the different ways I would present this new concept, improper fractions. But wait, I am letting my thoughts get ahead of me. Before I get into planning the "how", I need to remember the "why". This brought me back to the guidelines for designing a UDL lesson. The first thing I needed to do, was to nail down my learning goal for the lesson. I went to the curriculum guide for help. The SCO I am working on states "demonstrate an understanding of improper fractions and mixed numbers." Ok, that's specific. So, I then turn my attention to the indicators of success. It is here that helped me form my first learning goal. Learners are expected to represent that an improper fraction is greater than 1 and represent it in different ways. It took me a few minutes to play with the semantics of the goal, but in the end I created something. I had to convince myself I did not need perfection at this point, rather a starting point. Using student friendly language in the form of "I can" statements my learning goal is born. "I can show improper fractions are greater than 1." Is it perfect? Hell no, but it is a start.
Barriers - Hmmmm. This one made me think. What barriers exist that would impede the successful attainment of the learning goal? Katie Novak offers great suggestions on barriers that may exist and how to combat them. For me, it was several things. The learning environment, engagement, vocab (new concept and new words), representations and also, how learners would show me they understood. Where to start?
Nervous and excitement. Together, they make for some really interesting feelings. But, that is the best way I could describe how I was feeling the seconds before I joined my Google Meet session to try out my plans. I could feel the energy bubbling inside my belly, but would this work?
My main goal for the class, as time goes by so quickly, was to introduce the learning goal, relate that back to our previous work we had done before Christmas, explain why it was important to learn about improper fractions (and honestly, I had to think hard about that one myself). Then, in thinking about the barriers, I needed to talk about the vocab words they would need to know to proceed with understanding the lesson. So, I began. I wasn't too far into the lesson, when I realized I was talking too much (again). The activity I had planned for activating prior knowledge, an image of an improper fraction combined with a picture to illustrate it, did not produce the conversation I anticipated. Sitting there, staring at a very quiet screen, I am sinking. What was I doing wrong? What barriers exist here that I did not think of?
Could it be they knew nothing about the image I presented? Was the questions not clear enough? "Tell me about what you see in this image?". Like, isn't that open enough. Was it the platform of being online? This was the first time in the duration on online learning they were online in the afternoon. Did this have anything to do with it? I'm usually pretty good reading the situation, but this online stuff, hiding behind a screen, behind an icon, is bullshit. After what seemed to be a million years, I did have some brave souls offer some ideas. (Which were pretty good). But again, it did not generate the conversation I expected. This threw me off. It was from this conversation that I had planned to ease into introducing improper fractions and ways to represent them. But it was harder than I thought. Again, I felt I was talking way too much, and the 5-10 minute mini lesson was becoming a lot longer (and more painful). But the show must go on.
Our Google Classroom
Many options
What do you know?
More options
Using benchmarks to compare
January 21st, 2022
Back to the drawing board. Refection is such a powerful and necessary component of teaching. After my online class as described above, I questioned what I could have done differently and what aspects of the lesson I needed to improve. I felt my learning goal was appropriate but it was the anticipation of barriers that got me. While I recognized the need to introduce new vocabulary, understood the complexities of online learning and opened the lesson with an open ended question, I did not anticipate the lack of knowledge around fractions in general. I assumed my learners would be ready to tackle improper fractions as I assumed they had a good conceptual understanding of fractions, how to represent proper fractions and how to compare. However, this was not the case. Pre-assessing my learners would have avoided this situation I now found myself in. It was here I had to pivot and go back to the drawing board.
I consulted the curriculum guides and some resources from NCTM (National Council of Teachers of Mathematics) to refresh my understanding on key ideas and concepts learners need to know to have a strong conceptual understanding of fractions. I brushed up on how to introduce fractions in different ways, contexts and representations and thought about how to make fractions relevant to my learners.
So, my planning began again.
The next 2 weeks, my focus was on going back to work on proper fractions.
I began this time by finding out what learners already knew about fractions. Leveraging digital, I gave them options on how to learn about fractions, including direct teaching with mini lessons, videos, examples of representing and comparing fractions, pre-recorded mini lessons to upload for review after class if needed, and tried to offer at home learning activities that helped students see the relevance of fractions in their lives. With a lot of patience and persistence... it was working. I noticed students were more engaged in their online classes, and were actually doing the assigned work at home. I was able to give them individual feedback through Google Classroom and promoted their thinking based on their work, and their thinking at the time. Success.
Using 0, 1/2, 1 to understand quantity
Assessing
January 28, 2022
We were back in person. But things were not going good. Self regulation was out the window. Independence, persistence and grit must have gotten lost. Now that I had them on track with curriculum, another issue was arising.
On-line learning gave me the platform to get my head around planning math lessons to make it more accessible and equitable for my learners. I focused on engaging their interest, using different online tools to represent the material and then found some pretty neat ways to have them show their learning - at home. Heading back to the classroom shouldn't be so different, right? Theoretically, no. Practically, yes. After the first two classes back, I quickly realized while I had the ingredients of making my lessons more universally designed, the recipe was not right.
The hour long classes which was now before me, versus thirty minute on-line classes, were not productive. I found myself spending more time managing behaviour than I was 'teaching'. I was back to talking at them and while I was providing opportunities for them to choose how to learn and practice, (providing choice in tasks, manipulatives, groupings, where to do their work, how to show their learning), they were not responding well. I will rephrase - I was not tuning into what they needed to self regulate and make good 'fit' choices for themselves.
AHA MOMENT! Universally designed classrooms does not simply mean providing choices - choice in questions, choice in where work is completed, choice in how learning occurs, choice in how learning is demonstrated. While all of this is important, and as I am learning, necessary for removing barriers, it will not complete the whole puzzle. Multiple means of engagement is the first UDL guideline in CAST's framework. While providing choices to learners in their learning environment constitutes parts of this guideline, I was missing an important part - the one thing that was throwing off my classes - self regulation. Now, sustaining interest and persistence could certainly be argued as well, but upon reflection, I felt it was lack of self regulation that caused the issues.
Paint this picture of my class - I would spend the first five minutes or so having a chat with the class. They always had stories to tell and things to say. To get it out of their system, I would engage that first. Then, I would proceed with my mini lesson - whole group. I would write and discuss the learning goal for the class. Then proceed to the mini lesson. I would keep track of time and ensure this did not last longer than 10 minutes. (During a PL opportunity with the Daily 5 Cafe sisters, it was said kids can only attend the number of minutes they are old, up to a maximum of 15 minutes. So for these Grade 6 learners, that would be 11 minutes. This has stuck with me ever since I heard it. For me as an adult, if I can last 10 minutes attending to someone talking, I am pretty lucky!!) I noticed the class, as a whole were attentive and focused during this time. A few reminders were needed, but overall it was ok. Once the mini lesson was complete, which usually saw me ask learners to come to the board to do some guided practice, think a loud, etc, I would then explain the task or activity. This became the bulk of the class. They were given choices based on what they needed as a learner at the time - work with me for guided practice and review, or challenge; work with self for practice of new skills (journal type activities, problem solving, paper/pencil); work with a partner (problem solving, paper/pencil/games); work with technology (watch videos for review of concepts, games to reinforce skills). I would offer them choice on who to work with and where. They could choose to work at tables in the back of the classroom, at their desks, on the floor, using the whiteboard, using the whiteboard easel. For this 20-25 minute period of time, it was here that things became problematic. There was a lot of chatting, but not about the tasks at hand. There was a lot of moving around, there was a lot of learners 'needing me', there was a lot of reminders... it was not working. The last few minutes of class, if I was able to catch my breath long enough and realize there were a few minutes left, we cleaned up and got ready for the next class. I was pooped.
So, self regulation was my next challenge.
February 4th. 2022
I began reading more on what it means to self regulate and kept thinking about what needed to change in my planning and implementation. What changes could I make to help my learners self regulate? What could I do? I used the UDL Guidelines framework to help guide my thinking about how to help my learners make good choices for themselves. Just like we teach our learners how to choose "good fit" books, we need to teach our kids how to make 'good fit' choices. To do this, they themselves have to understand who they are as learners and what they need. They also need time to reflect on their choices and if it was indeed a good choice for them.
In the framework under checkpoint 7.1 it speaks to optimizing individual choice and autonomy. It states " it is important to note that individuals differ in how much and what kind of choices they prefer to have. It is therefore not enough to simply provide choice. The right kind of choice and level of independence must be optimized to ensure engagement." This solidified my thinking and I knew I had to be more purposeful in the choices I was offering, but also in talking to my learners about making good choices. I also knew the importance of reflection and had to ensure this was integrated part of my class.
PIVOT again. Over the next few WEEKS, my focus in my classroom was on helping my learners make good choices. We discussed how everyone is unique and learns differently, how everyone needs different things at different times. We discussed the things that make learning hard for some and easy for others, and how some people like working alone while others enjoy working together. We talked about how some days, depending on how they are feeling, or what the learning goal is, or what they need to do to achieve the learning goal, they may want to work alone, at their desk and watch a video on the topic. While another day, they may feel they need to sit and talk to a peer about their thinking. The article that Katie Novak wrote "The Lochness Monster, Yetis, Big Foot, and Learning Styles" certainly came full circle. CONTEXT, not learning styles need to be accounted for; removing as many barriers to learning by offering choices is how to ensure success for all. I felt my learners understood more fully the importance of making good choices in the class and it also meant they had to understand themselves better as a learner.
Talking about doing is not enough. We now had to put this into practice. How can one get better at something if not given the opportunity to practice what they are learning? It is here that I made sure the choices I was giving my learners was purposeful, academically appropriate and actually removed barriers to learning and not just an option because it was easy. My lessons began the same, but my 'chats' at the beginning of class focused on how they were feeling, how their day was going and how they felt about the upcoming math class. We talked more about making good choices during the class and how it was ok if we made a bad choice - making a bad choice meant we will learn something new about ourselves and we can make a better choice tomorrow. When it came time to break into our learning groups (rotations), I emphasized making good choices for themselves and then let them go.
LET THEM GO. Three simple words, but three of the hardest words to do as a teacher. Let them go. But I did... creating autonomy and building confidence is so important in the journey of becoming an expert learner. I believed in my learners and I knew they could do it. In the beginning, it was a little rough. Learners did not make good choices and some days, the math did not get done. Other days, the choices were good, and math got done. Some days, there were just too many in a group while other days, that group worked. Some days, the kid that worked alone rocked the activity, other days he needed a friend.
But at the end of every day, we took time to reflect. This became a huge change agent in our class. Reflection. Each day, I was more mindful of the time and made sure there was at least 10 minutes before class ended to call everyone together to chat about the class. Kids are brutally honest when you ask them the right questions in the right space - a safe space. When asked if they made good choices in their grouping, work, activities, learning, they were all very quick and honest to say yes or no. It was the times that the 'no's came up that peaked more discussions. "Why?" became my favorite response when a learner said they did not make a good choice today. This little word begs for further reflection and thinking. Many times they could pin point their reasons, other times, I think they just did not want to admit the reasons. In any case, it got them thinking.
Thinking about how their choices affect their learning.
February 18, 2022
And one day, it happens. The day when you realize all the hard work, blood, sweat and tears is worth it. Here is Carson. Carson loves the outdoors, hates masks, loves hockey, hates sitting for long periods of time, likes math, dislikes 'having to be creative', LOVES TO TALK, and hates doing work alone. However, after making a choice to work in a group the day before, which became the wrong choice as there was more bickering than math being done, Carson reflects and then choses to work alone the next day. Here is Carson's thoughts on his choices.
February 25, 2022.
Making good choices has become an intregal part of my classroom. Providing choices that are academically appropriate, in the right context, and purposeful are just as important. Now that both teacher and student are working together to shape and design the choices, things are getting better. Learners tell me what they need, and I listen. My daily informal assessing guides my choices for the next class and shapes the learning goal. Giving my learners the autonomy to make choices has been essential and although they need reminders, and reinforcements, they are getting better. This is Payton and Jaxon reflecting on their learning and choices they are making in their class.
March 18th, 2022.
I have been on a journey of its own when it comes to learning goals. I consider it more of a side street in my UDL journey, but important just the same. And after my latest revelation in math class around multiple means of engagement, it was even more evident on how important learning goals really are in the process toward helping students become expert learners.
The whole notion of learning goals came on my radar when I began work around standard based assessment. I began diving into curriculum outcomes and looking at ways to capture the big ideas and reword these expectations in student friendly language. It was these goals then that became the focus of creating success criteria rubrics where explicit expectations of that goal was written using a rubric that identified the standards for success. I saw these learning goals as something I created, to focus my lessons and then use it to assess student learning.
When I began on-line learning in January, creating a learning goal was the first step. Using Katie Novak's UDL Lesson Planner, this was the first step that was identified in the process. Once I figured out what learning objective (outcome) I needed to focus on, I then had to figure out how to word the goal in student friendly language. I thought about what specifically I wanted my learners to understand and do at the end of the lesson and then created it from there. Kind of like backward design, but simplified. This learning goal then became the focus of my lesson and as I worked through planning it, I realized it gave my lesson more purpose and direction. I felt the more specific and direct the learning goal was, the clearer it would be for learners to understand, and for me to anticipate barriers to achieving this goal. Without me realizing it at the time, creating this learning goal at the beginning, provided direction for both me and my learners. It might sound rather insignificant as one may think that when we design lessons and teach it, it centres on the goal, but this was different. It became common practice for me to write the goal on the whiteboard, or on a tasks each day and discuss what it means. It became a conversation piece and it became something my learners knew they had to work towards and prove they had achieved it.
Ever have a moment when something happens totally out of the blue that surprises you but then once you reflect, you realize this should not be a surprise? Well, that moment for me came after a lesson on representing decimals. At the beginning of the class, we talked about the work that we had previously done on decimals (after some pre-assessments, it was determined that students did not have a good understanding of decimals and we went back to basic work of place value, naming and connecting decimals to fractions and percentages). This days lesson continued this work and the learning goal was "I can represent decimals in tenths and hundredths." At the beginning of class, I wrote a question on the board "Is 0.5 and 0.05 equal?" Learners answered the question (100% incorrect), and said they were the same number. I collected their responses and laid it on my desk. Then wrote the learning goal. We dug in and started work on representing decimals. Thankfully, I had a double class that day and self regulation and motivation was at its best. At the end of the 2 hours, I gave the same question again "Is 0.5 and 0.05 equal?". This time, I had 100% correct.
Then out of the blue a little voice speaks "Miss, our learning goal, we achieved it. We did it. We can really do math."
I paused (maybe fighting back a few tears). I replied "Yes, you did achieve our goal. And yes, you can really do math."
It was a moment for all of us. I think I learned more that class than my learners.
Creating learning goals and sharing them with the class was something I did. In the back of my mind I knew I needed to get US to a place where we created them together where learners set goals for themselves. Without realizing what was transpiring, the learners in my class were internalizing these learning goals and started to make them thier own. They owned them.
It wasn't just about the AHA moment when the learner realized they have achieved the goal, it was the fact that by stating the goal up front and setting the expectation for learning, students could see what learning looked like, and helped them realize they can do math.
As I dive into my UDL journey further, I realize learning goals are so much more than that. While I am not where I feel I need to be with co-creating learning goals, I do however feel I am on the right side street.
March 25th, 2022
A slight deviation in my blog today, but I felt it equally important to share.
It has been said the UDL is not something you do, but something you believe. It is a shift in mindset about learning where learners are at the centre, where curriculum is deficit, not the child. My UDL journey has helped me understand learning better and how to break down barriers to ensure we are reaching as many learners as possible in our classes. But, it has also taught me how to more effectively help teachers improve their practice.
As an administrator, I often wander into classrooms to see how things are going, but mostly to interact with teachers and students. This has become the best part of my day. Engaging with learners and their teachers, seeing the different methods of teaching and the skills employed has been wonderful. I also like to follow up with teachers at the end of the day to note the positive things I saw and chat about some things he/she would like to work on. At first, this was a little tough for me, as there were times I struggled with giving effective feedback, especially during times when the lesson was not successful or learners did not engage. Aligning with this, it is also my responsibility to complete new teacher evaluations. These are more formal and occur at least twice a year. Again, I found myself being able to talk about all the great things I was noticing, but struggled to make suggestions and give feedback on ways to improve.
Over the last few months, I have been noticing a change in the interactions I have with my teachers. The principles of UDL are creeping into everything I do. And it’s now becoming a part of my conversations with teachers. A mind shift... yes.
I had the privilege of having a brand new teacher come into my building this year. I was very open from the beginning about my classroom visits ensuring he was comfortable with me being in his classroom and not feel threatened. Sitting in his classroom one afternoon, he was introducing a concept in science around mutations in genetics. He was using a lecture style and drew diagrams on the board trying to engage his learners. It wasn't working. I could see he was getting a little agitated and very aware of how the lesson was going. I felt like I needed to help... it was one of those teachable moments that I could not pass up. So, I asked if I could interrupt the conversation. I asked the kids if they understood what the word 'mutations' meant. (Under the multiple means of representation guideline, clarifying new vocabulary is a checkpoint that ensures all learners understand any new vocab presented in the lesson - if not this will be a huge barrier) They were honest and admitted they did not. Being Jr. High students who never veered very far from their phones, I asked that they use their phones to look up images of animal mutations. (Obtaining a visual schemata and increasing engagement (recruiting interest) I asked they think about the word mutation and with their shoulder partner try to figure out what it is using the pictures they were viewing. (This I knew, would buy me time with the teacher). While the kids were busy looking at two headed cats and cows with three eyes, I was able to chat with the teacher. He admittedly knew his approach to introducing the topic was not working but was unable to tell me why. At this moment, my UDL brain warped into gear and I began giving him effective feedback to help him pivot in the lesson and engage his learners. I made a few suggestions to get him thinking about multiple ways to represent the material, such as using videos and pictures that explained the mutation. I also asked him if he thought one of the barriers of this lesson was lack of understanding of the word mutation, he agreed. From there, we (quickly) made a plan for the rest of the class that focused on helping learners understand what mutations meant. I checked in with him after the class was over and he was very pleased with how the remainder of the class went. Success.
So, here I am offering suggestions and giving effective feedback through the lens of UDL. A shift in mindset - absolutely. It is evident now that is a part of me and has become how I think.
April 8th, 2022
UDL - Universal Design for Learning, in my opinion, is one of the most underutilized and misunderstood educational frameworks in Newfoundland and Labrador today. Many equate UDL as something you simply 'do', like offering students choice in a learning activity or assessment. UDL in its simplest definition is "an approach to teaching aimed at meeting the needs of every student in a classroom.1" Given this definition, one must deduce that UDL is a lot more than simply offering learners choice in an activity or just something you 'do'. UDL is a framework that encompasses a set of core values that form a belief system that guide thinking and yes, doing in your classroom. This framework (and thinking) places the learner at the centre of everything, where it is the curriculum that is deficit and not the learner. CAST (Center of Applied Special Technology), a nonprofit education research and development organization created the Universal Design for Learning framework and UDL Guidelines, which are now being used around the world to make learning more inclusive. This framework has been created to improve and optimize teaching and learning for all people based on scientific insights into how humans learn. UDL aims to provide equity in education, promotes high expectations where all can access learning.
As a province, we face numerous educational challenges compounded by the complexities of Covid-19. Our population is becoming more diverse, therefore so too are our classrooms. The interruptions in education due to Covid has resulted in what some claim to be a 'learning loss' where the gap in understanding of foundational skills continues to widen. The Responsive Teaching and Learning policy has brought changes in how we provide support to learners who struggle in literacy, numeracy and SEL, but also has put resources in our schools such as reading specialists, teacher librarians and teaching and learning assistants (TLAs). However, many schools still struggle with meeting the needs of all learners, as there seems to be an ever increasing number of students needing interventions, and echoes ring in every hallway; there never seems to be enough support/resources to go around. Increasing class sizes continue to be a dominant issue, leaving our teachers feeling defeated as they walk out of their classrooms everyday feeling they just can't provide enough to everyone.
Is anyone listening?
Our province is listening and has been listening even before the Covid 19 pandemic wrecked havoc. The Department of Education along with the Newfoundland and Labrador English School District began noticing the world wide trend to adopt the principles of UDL in all aspects of education. Even before the turmoil that Covid brought us, the government of NL recognized the need for a better education system and organization in NL. In 2017, the Premier's Task Force released a report "Now is the Time" outlining what is needed to improve the educational outcomes in our province. From this report a year later, the Education Action Plan was created which highlighted the need for a new way of thinking and doing in our schools. It was here that the Responsive Teaching and Learning Policy was born. The Department of Education, along with all other stakeholders involved in this report saw how the principles of universal design for learning could improve our situation and stated "The Newfoundland and Labrador’s Education Action Plan includes the adoption of Universal Design for Learning. It forms part of the foundation and context for the Responsive Teaching and Learning Policy". 2 The Task Force Report continued to verify the impact of UDL on inclusion and states, "for curriculum to be accessible to all students it needs to be designed appropriately, ensuring that the strategies and supports for students with exceptionalities are included. This would reduce the need for formal assessment or diagnosis as good teaching and evaluation strategies are embedded in a curriculum that is developed using Universal Design for Learning. An accessible curriculum in the primary grades will set the stage for improved educational outcomes later, especially in literacy, numeracy and self-regulation" (p. 13). To create a system that can sustain itself, for the Responsive Teaching and Learning policy to deliver what it was intended, UDL is the foundation to set that in motion. The report went on to say " You begin to see that Universal Design for Learning is the foundation for everything we do in education. The responsive teaching and learning policy sits in this framework for learning."
This was a bold and brave stance that UDL would form the basis and foundation for this new responsive teaching and learning policy, along with the promise of implementing UDL in every aspect of curriculum development, resource selection, learning environments and lesson planning. The Newfoundland and Labrador English School District supported these recommendations and made firm their intentions in their Strategic Plan 2020-2023 to maintain their vision of being an "educational leader preparing all students to achieve to their fullest potential in an inclusive, safe and caring environment" which certainly encompasses UDL as it promised to "focus on priorities highlighted in our consultations; supporting all students through responsive teaching and learning practices...". 4
So, our government and policy leaders, district leaders, task force members, all recognize the power of UDL in education. They believed in UDL so much that they made this the foundation of many decisions and new policies and procedures moving forward. If the leaders in our government and other agencies around the world (Katie Novak, Louie Lord Nelson, George Couros) recognize this, there must be something to it. Right?
Honoring learner variability, setting firm goals but using flexible means to achieve these goals, removing barriers to learning and working towards helping our students become expert learners are the core values of universal design for learning. When you believe in universal design for learning, you also believe all children can learn. As educators, we impact this learning to the greatest degree. When UDL becomes a part of your approach to teaching and learning, the positive impacts of this are immeasurable. Positive relationships form between students and teachers, learners begin to believe in themselves - that they can learn and find success. Teachers are empowered as they invest in their own learning to change their instructional and assessment practices and use evidence based decisions to guide planning and implementation. Optimal learning environments are created and the group of educators that embarked on this journey see for themselves they can make a difference and the collective efficacy of the school, the district and the province grows. Discipline issues decrease as student engagement increases. So, if you were to look into the vision and values of each school in Newfoundland and Labrador, and dive into the strategic issues outlined in every school improvement plan, you will see at least one or two of the above mentioned things in the plan. The successful implementation of the UDL framework and the principles that outline it could improve every school improvement determinant. UDL is not an option anymore, it is a necessity.
References
5 examples of universal design for learning in the classroom. Reading Rockets. (2019, December 18). Retrieved April 23, 2022, from https://www.readingrockets.org/article/5-examples-universal-design-learning-classroom#:~:text=Universal%20Design%20for%20Learning%20(UDL,can%20work%20in%20a%20classroom.
Education - government of Newfoundland and Labrador. (n.d.). Retrieved April 23, 2022, from https://www.gov.nl.ca/education/files/eap-report.pdf
The Premier’s Task Force on Improving Educational Outcomes Now is the Time. (n.d.). https://www.gov.nl.ca/education/files/task_force_report.pdf
2022. [online] Available at: <https://www.nlesd.ca/about/strategicplans/doc/strategicplan2020-23.pdf> [Accessed 11 April 2022].
April 22, 2002
I had an epiphany. Holy cow. GAME CHANGER. I found the missing piece of the UDL puzzle I needed. (For now at least). Listening to the podcast Talking about all things Inclusion featuring Dr. David Rose (see here for the link to the podcast), I (finally) tuned into the role of the brain on learning and how (neuro-science) pretty much defined and created the universal design for learning framework. Dr. Rose explained how the brain is, in its simplest forms, divided into three sections and each of these sections have its own distinct part to play in learning. Well, this hooked my interest. It has taken me TWO years to zero in on this. Like what? Anyways, Dr. Rose went on to explain that it was these three areas, namely the front, middle and back of the brain and its functions that guided and directed what we know as the three guiding principles of UDL - engagement, representation and action and expression. I have read, analyzed, viewed and studied these guidelines for 2 years. I have seen the words "affective network", "recognition network" and "strategic network" a million times. But, I didn't understand nor did I make the connection about how these three fundamental pillars related to the brain. Learner variability, without really thinking critically about it, I thought was the difference we see in a learner - the whole being and not the brain of the learner. OMG. NOW, it all makes sense. The guidelines make sense to me now. To capture this moment, I created a short video explaining my thinking and learning.
Have a look and listen. I might not make sense, but talking out my thinking helps me to assimilate my new learning and solidifies my ideas. Would love to hear what you think?
Maya Angelou once said “Do the best you can until you know better. Then when you know better, do better.”
Doing our best for our learners each and every day is what every teacher and educator strives for. Teachers around our province are working so hard, spending countless hours designing lessons, prepping and planning, correcting and assessing. That combined with learning new skills and strategies to tackle the barriers that Covid and online learning brought us, its exhausting. But, as hard as our teachers are working, the needs of all the learners in the classroom are not being met. It seems no matter how hard teachers work, there are still those kiddos that sit at their desks that are not getting what they need.
The world is changing, education is changing. The way we think about learning is changing. Classrooms are more diverse than ever and each brings with it its own set of unique challenges. Additionally, every learner is vastly different from the other, so planning for a class of 25 kids can seem so overwhelming. The strategies, and pedagogy that we have been using, the tried and true methods that have been around since we were in school are just not cutting it anymore. Everything we have seemed to know is not working.
If schools are expected to design learning spaces so all learners can be successful, and teachers are responsible for designing these conditions, but what we know is not working, then it is time we start to ‘know better’ so we can start doing better.
Todd Rose, in his famous TedTalk “the myth of Average” has blown open our thinking and understanding of ‘the average learner’. Simply put, one such average student does not exist. Just like each of us are different, each learner in our classrooms are different and vary in many ways and in different contexts. Many of our tried and true practices target the average learner. Our textbooks, curriculum resources, and assessments aim for the average. We need to stop. We need to immediately stop teaching to the average. We need to stop planning a one size fits all learning environment and stop designing for the average learner - In doing so, we are designing for no one and everyone is at a disadvantage.
Knowing better to do better sounds easy, but where do we start? We start by reflecting on our own beliefs and then take a hard look at our practices. Do they align? For example, if we believe ALL learners in our classes CAN learn, and we believe in learner variability, but we give everyone the same reading material, ask them to do the same task and assess them in the same way how is that honoring learner variability? When we believe in this variability, we know a one size fits all approach does not work. Our schools and systems have not been traditionally designed to meet the needs of all our learners. We have grown up in a system where many people have been left behind. We need to stop this. We need to design universally where we meet the needs of every one of our students. We need to move away from designing for teh average and a one size fits all thinking. We need to shift our mindset to truly believe we can be the change agents that can make a difference so every one of our learners can be successful. We need to understand and believe it is the curriculum and the conditions we create that are deficit and not our learners. Let me say that again. It is not the learners in front of us that are deficit, but what we teach and the ways in which we teach and deliver curriculum thats deficit. When you understand that, and it becomes entrenched in your belief system, you bring power to your teaching.
We can do better. We can do better for all our learners when we provide multiple ways for them to learn, vary the materials they use and provide multiple opportunities for them to show what they have learned. We don't have to continue to be frustrated and leave our classrooms feeling defeated. We can take control of the learning environments we create and begin to do better. We can do this by diving into the framework of Universal design for learning. THis framework provides principles and guidelines that can be applied to intentionally design your lessons that will reach all learners in your class without having to spend countless hours planning individual lessons trying to meet the needs of every student. UDL provides us with a framework that helps us to predict learner variability and gives us tools and guidance on how to intentionally design our learning experiences to remove barriers so all our learners can access rich, engaging lessons and be successful. It is here we begin to provide equitable learning environments for all. Universal design for Learning is what we need right now to do better. This framework is rooted in scientific research that holds true the beliefs that all students can learn, it embraces learner variability and in the end creates expert learners.
The world is changing. Education is changing, so of course teaching is changing. I would be very concerned to think our teaching practices and pedagogy is not changing - by not changing means its failing. And I guarantee from what I see, education and the teachers that make it are not failing - quite the opposite. We are a thriving profession. But that's not what UDL is. UDL is a thriving movement - a revelation in education.1 And as the world continues to change, including education, we can do one of two things - sit back and let it happen and continue to do what we have always done or become part of the transition team.
Do the best you can until you know better. Then, when you know better, you do better. You now know better. So what are you going to do about it?
Thank you.
YouTube. (2018). YouTube. Retrieved August 3, 2022, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dq6Ly5DgBq4&t=0s.