This studio investigates architecture as a framework for inclusion, dignity, independence, accessibility, and community.
Through precedent analysis, students will study how architecture can support adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities, aging populations, neurodiverse users, caregivers, and broader communities through thoughful spatial organization and inclusive design strategies.
The class was divided into 5 Research Groups with 3 Students Per Group
Each group became the studio’s “expert team” for one thematic category of inclusive housing and community design. Each group analyzed:
3 precedent projects
one domestic precedent
one international precedent
one comparative precedent (optional)
CO-HOUSING + COLLECTIVE LIVING
SUPPORTIVE + DISABILITY-FORWARD HOUSING
MICRO-COMMUNITIES + URBAN INTEGRATION
AGING IN PLACE + INTERGENERATIONAL LIVING
THERAPEUTIC + SENSORY ENVIRONMENTS
In Assignment 1B, students will test these ideas through direct observation and embodied experience. Through wheelchair navigation, blindfolded circulation exercises, and sensory mapping studies, students will evaluate how architecture supports or limits accessibility, comfort, orientation, independence, participation, and sensory regulation.
Arrival, Entry, and Support Spaces
Building entrances
Lobby/reception areas
Elevators
Restrooms
First impressions, wayfinding, and accessibility of arrival sequences
Circulation and Campus Connections
Interior corridors
Stairs and vertical circulation
Exterior pathways
Campus connections
Navigation, transitions, and movement through the environment
Learning and Social Spaces
Classrooms
Study spaces
Lounges and commons
Informal gathering areas
Sensory qualities, comfort, and opportunities for social interaction
Assignment 1C engaged students, self-advocates, caregivers, and community partners in a collaborative visioning workshop. Guided by My Story narratives—personal accounts describing daily life, preferences, aspirations, and support needs—students explored how architecture can foster dignity, autonomy, belonging, and meaningful participation in community life. The workshop established a foundation of shared values and design criteria that informed the studio's later design work.
GROUP 1
Participants: Janice, Joel, Sophia
GROUP 2
Participants: Katie, Emma, Isabella
GROUP 3
Participants: Ayumi, Sue, Aaron
GROUP 4
Participants: George, Lauren, Peggy
GROUP 5
Participants: David, Anthony, Holly