STEM sites may enhance teen educators’ STEM interest and academic motivation by integrating social-emotional practices into their training and programming.
Hoffman et al. (2021)
Gender stereotypes develop in early childhood and are reinforced through interactions with adults. Informal STEM learning sites may enhance children’s development of counter-stereotypical gender beliefs outside of formal education settings by providing opportunities for girls to interact with female educators.
Hoffman et al. (2021)
McGuire et al. (2020)
McGuire et al. (2021)
Parents and children interact with one another more without an educator present at an exhibit than when they engage with an educator at an exhibit.
Joy et al. (2021)
STEM sites may gain insight into how visitors learn by observing how visitors engage with each other, with exhibits, and with educators.
Joy et al. (2021)
Adult visitors do not always provide accurate science information to child visitors. Adults are more likely to request accurate science information from youth educators than from adult educators or when engaging at an exhibit without an educator.
Joy et al. (2021)
STEM sites can provide scaffolding to guide adult visitors’ engagements with child visitors by incorporating a mix of interactive exhibits; non-interactive exhibits; prompts for conversations between parents and children; and educators of various ages, genders, races, and ethnicities.
Joy et al. (2021)
Socially constructed learning may be most effective when youth educators and child visitors are close in age.
Mulvey, McGuire, Hoffman, Goff, et al. (2020)
STEM sites should differentiate exhibits, information, and interactivity to meet a variety of developmentally appropriate needs.
Mulvey, McGuire, Hoffman, Goff, et al. (2020)
By targeting early childhood programs, STEM sites may be able to enhance girls’ interest and academic motivation in STEM subjects.
Mulvey, McGuire, Hoffman, Goff, et al. (2020)
STEM sites may address gender bias by highlighting important female inventors and innovators in a variety of STEM fields.
Mulvey, McGuire, Hoffman, Goff, et al. (2020)
By training educators to engage young visitors, STEM sites can improve visitor engagement and learning. Youth educators are most effective at engaging middle childhood visitors.
McGuire et al. (2022)
Fostering in participants feelings of belonging within the program and that STEM is “for you” are key to improving math and science motivation and interpersonal skills in participants, which are important for pursuing STEM careers. While these skills are also important for participation in youth educator programs, not all participants feel motivated and competent.
Mulvey et al. (2022)
In order to prepare youths from backgrounds underrepresented in STEM for future careers, science learning sites should be actively inclusive towards individual social identity groups (i.e., gender, ethnic/cultural) and help youths develop a sense of belonging within the youth program at the site.
Zhao et al. (2023a)
In order to inhibit decline in science career interest amongst girls, science learning sites should focus on career development and fostering participants' confidence in their science abilities and feeling that their identity aligns with STEM.
Zhao et al. (2023b)
When teens feel like they belong to a group, they report increased interest in STEM subjects, increased academic motivation in STEM subjects, and increased social skills.
Hoffman et al. (2021)
Teens who rate their social skills highly may also perceive that they belong in STEM settings.
Hoffman et al. (2021)
Teens who feel a sense of belonging and inclusivity in their STEM site felt more prepared for STEM careers from their participation in the program.
Zhao et al. (2023a)
Science engagement, interest, and growth mindset (belief about one’s ability to learn), all factors that contribute to academic achievement, motivation, learning, and aspirations, tend to decline over adolescence; however, participation in youth educator programs can help mitigate this decline.
Joy et al. (2023)
Teen girls who feel confident in their ability to do science are more likely to want to pursue a career in science, and those who want to pursue a career in science are more likely to feel confident in their ability to do science and feel like their identities are aligned with STEM. Participation in STEM youth programs that focus on career development and building confidence in science abilities can serve as an important intervention to inhibit the decline in science career interests among girls.
Zhao et al. (2023b)
Visitors perceive they learn more when they engage with an educator at an exhibit than when they engage without an educator at an exhibit.
Joy et al. (2021)
When interacting with a youth educator rather than adult educator or no educator, adults were more likely to request science information, to report that they learned about STEM concepts, and to express interest in STEM exhibits.
Joy et al. (2021)
Mulvey, McGuire, Hoffman, Goff, et al. (2020)
Adult visitors may benefit from accurate science information, prompts, and questions to enhance their engagement with children and with the exhibits.
Joy et al. (2021)
By asking questions, adult visitors promote children’s observation of exhibits.
Joy et al. (2021)
By providing fewer science explanations and asking more questions, parents may create opportunities for children to guide their own learning and engagement with exhibits.
Joy et al. (2021)
Conversations with adult visitors and educators provide opportunities for child visitors to think deeply about the exhibits, to ask questions, to provide explanations about STEM concepts, and to create meaning from new information.
Joy et al. (2021)
Child visitors are more likely to provide science concept explanations to parents at exhibits without an educator.
Joy et al. (2021)
Children are more likely to engage with an interactive exhibit when no educator is present.
Joy et al. (2021)
Child visitors spend more time engaging with interactive exhibits without an educator than they spend observing a non-interactive exhibit.
Joy et al. (2021)
Child visitors provide more science explanations to adults when engaging with non-interactive exhibits than when engaging with interactive exhibits or with educators.
Joy et al. (2021)
Young children perceive they learn more from STEM site engagement compared to adolescents’ perceptions of learning; however, young children recall fewer accurate facts than adolescents when asked questions related to exhibit content.
Mulvey, McGuire, Hoffman, Goff, et al. (2020)
Children may learn more when interacting with an educator than when interacting with a static exhibit.
Mulvey, McGuire, Hoffman, Goff, et al. (2020)
Girls may continue to construct their STEM-related identities when interacting with female educators in informal STEM learning sites. They reported more interest in math after interacting with female educators than after interacting with male educators.
McGuire et al. (2021)
Interactions with educators increases engagement and learning even when visitor interest in the exhibit topic is low.
McGuire et al. (2022)
The William T. Grant foundation suggests a framework for successful research-practice partnerships that includes “(1) building trust between partners, (2) ensuring that the research is rigorous, (3) supporting the practice-based organization, (4) generating knowledge that can inform practice, and (5) building capacity for the practice-based organization’s success” (p. 126).
Mulvey, McGuire, Hoffman, Hartstone-Rose, et al. (2020)
Researchers should involve the site in creating the research and in guiding the research process.
Mulvey, McGuire, Hoffman, Hartstone-Rose, et al. (2020)
The site can enhance their programming by applying the research findings to their programs, and researchers can enhance their research practices by cooperating with sites and facilitating application of the research findings.
Mulvey, McGuire, Hoffman, Hartstone-Rose, et al. (2020)
Trust is fundamental to successful research-practice partnerships. Researchers should examine the hierarchies inherent in the relationships that exist between researchers, site participants, and community members.
Mulvey, McGuire, Hoffman, Hartstone-Rose, et al. (2020)
The site’s context and culture should inform research creation and be incorporated into the research process.
Mulvey, McGuire, Hoffman, Hartstone-Rose, et al. (2020)
Findings should be disseminated to the site’s stakeholders soon after the research project ends. Researchers can develop accessible workshops, newsletters, and magazine articles with site participants. For academic dissemination, open-access journals are preferred.
Mulvey, McGuire, Hoffman, Hartstone-Rose, et al. (2020)
Collaboration and trust are key aspects of successful research-practice partnerships.
Mulvey, McGuire, Hoffman, Hartstone-Rose, et al. (2020)