The judging criteria for the Digital Poster Category are as follows:

• Depth of understanding (40%):

  • • • The poster demonstrates a clear and complete understanding of mathematical concepts with correct use of terminologies and notations.

      • The poster makes relevant mathematical observations and establishes connections between concepts.

      • The poster shows a thorough synthesis of ideas in the applications of concepts. 

• Originality (30%):

  • • • The poster presents the application of mathematics from a fresh perspective or in interesting contexts.

      • The poster provides relevant information on mathematical concepts that arouses audience’s interests. 

• Presentation (30%):

  • • • The poster uses an organised and coherent layout of the information to facilitate the understanding of mathematical concepts involved.

      • The poster uses a variety of suitable graphics (e.g. pictures, graphs, charts and diagrams) to illustrate mathematical concepts.

The judging criteria for the Physical Game Design Category are as follows:

• Depth of understanding (50%):

  • • • Mathematical concepts are thoughtfully incorporated into the gameplay.

      • The game demonstrates a clear and complete understanding of the mathematical concepts in the design with correct use of terminologies and notations. 

• Originality (20%):

  • • • The game promotes strategic thinking among the players through the application of mathematical concepts in the game play.

• Presentation (10%):

  • • • The game has a coherent and organised layout of information and graphics to help players understand the game play.

      • The game gives clear instructions on the rules of the game. 

      • The game can be easily played and help players reinforce their conceptual understanding through the game play.

• Engagement (20%):

  • • • The game generates continuous interest for the players and motivates them to challenge themselves.

The judging criteria for the Digital Game Design Category are as follows:

• Depth of understanding (30%):

  • • • Mathematical concepts are thoughtfully incorporated into the gameplay.

      • The game demonstrates a clear and complete understanding of the mathematical concepts in the design with correct use of terminologies and notations.

• Originality (10%):

  • • • The game promotes strategic thinking among the players through the application of mathematical concepts in the game play.

      • Innovative use of block-based programming to enhance the math learning experience.

• Presentation (10%):

  • • • The game has a coherent and organised layout of information and graphics to help players understand the game play.

      • The game gives clear instructions on the rules of the game.

      • The game can be easily played and help players reinforce their conceptual understanding through the game play.

      • An interesting and captivating interface to capture the interest of targeted audience.

• Engagement (20%):

  • • • The game generates continuous interest for the players and motivates them to challenge themselves.

• Coding and Functionality (30%):

  • • • Complexity and functionality of the programming logic

        • • • Demonstration of sophisticated programming logic, including but not limited to the use of variables, loops, conditionals and custom procedures to create dynamic math-related interactions.

            • Effective use of block-based programming features and tools

            • Effective use of Scratch or other platform features such as sprites, costumes, backdrops and sounds to create a visually appealing and interactive game.

            • Ability to randomize questions using variables

            • Simplicity and elegance in coding