Election day is August 8, 2023 from 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. There are also several options to vote early. Make your plan to vote by visiting the voting information webpage.
The initial process started in 2016-2017, where facility and educational assessments were completed in both buildings. This included the physical, functional, and educational needs of the buildings. In 2021, the School Board asked for a volunteer community-driven taskforce to study current school conditions and provide a recommendation to the Board as to what next steps should be taken regarding school infrastructure issues.
This citizen’s committee of 15, invested over 18 hours of time doing the following:
Reviewing previous and updated engineering assessments.
Touring both schools.
Studying district demographic and enrollment information.
Learning about MN school finance, the District’s current financial position, and funding options from the District’s financial consultant.
Developing a community-wide survey.
Making a final recommendation to the school board.
The taskforce considered four primary options:
Do nothing.
Only fix immediate needs.
Fix all needs and remodel to address future-ready learning environments.
Build a new PK-12 school.
After exploring the costs and efforts required to fix existing buildings compared to building a new PK-12 building, the taskforce recommended building a new PK-12 school and on February 21, 2023, the School Board unanimously passed a resolution committing to move forward with planning for a new PK-12 school.
Enrollment trends are difficult to predict especially after COVID-19. There are also the open enrollment possibilities that we try to predict. Based on the numbers from the past several years, our K-12 enrollment has stayed consistent. There was some fluctuation immediately after the pandemic but that has leveled off.
Our current plans do not have a specific community fitness center planned, but there will be two gymnasiums along with several open/community-use areas.
Understanding the value of our school and the impact it has on our communities, we are committed to keeping the district intact through the solution presented to voters. Closing the District and merging with another is complex and has undesirable consequences.
Residents would likely pay higher school property taxes to the new school district compared to what is currently being paid to Glenville-Emmons.
Students would likely spend more time driving or on buses in order to get to/from their new school including extracurricular activities.
Current Glenville-Emmons contracts would be voided, including those that allow students to attend school in Iowa.
The reason is essentially due to funding and cost. Glenville-Emmons receives about 75% of its funding from the State of MN, with a small portion from the Federal government (about 2%) and local property tax and other sources (about 23%).
Funding from the State is mainly for day-to-day operations of the school district (e.g. teacher salaries, programming and educational materials, special education, utilities, etc.), while responsibility for buildings and equipment is largely the responsibility of the local community.
Like other small rural school districts in Minnesota, Glenville-Emmons receives a relatively small amount of money each year to maintain facilities, which is far less than the cost of significant repairs or replacements such as a roof.
The only way small rural districts can complete significant projects like these is generally through a bond referendum.
Glenville-Emmons has not had a referendum to address facility projects in many years for various reasons. The result of delaying maintenance projects has been continued worsening of building conditions (e.g. every year a roof is not fixed, additional leaks occur which can lead to structural issues, decreased indoor air quality, damage to equipment and materials, etc.) and more expensive projects due to inflation.
The previous referendum, in 2018, was an operating referendum (or levy override). Nearly 70% of districts have passed an operating referendum to help support student programming and other operational aspects of the budget but is generally not used for major facility related projects.
Passing the referendum and building a new school would result in minimal long-term maintenance costs as everything is new. This allows the school district to set aside money for maintenance and address any issues early and cost-effectively. Additionally, the new building systems are highly efficient, leading to reduced day-to-day utility costs. The savings from this can be used to add programming or teachers for the benefit of the students.
All residents would continue to pay school property taxes, however, taxes would be paid to the new school district rather than Glenville-Emmons.
Based on current tax rates, it is anticipated that taxes would increase if our district were merged with another district.
The School Board is requesting $37,420,000 in general obligation bonds for the construction of a new PK-12 school.
The school district spent considerable time with our engineering and architecture design team partner SitelogIQ in developing a budget for a new PK-12 school. This involved:
Meetings and ideation sessions with teachers and other school district staff to determine the needs for a new PK-12 school.
Reviewing and applying State Department of Education guidelines for school designs.
Development of a programming document that compiled school design parameters that included things like size and number of classrooms and space for gyms, cafeteria, offices, etc.
Utilized industry standards and other recent school construction costs to develop rough order of magnitude pricing to construct and furnish a new PK-12 school for Glenville-Emmons.
Applied inflation and contingency factors to establish a final cost estimate for the referendum.
If the referendum passes, a detailed design process, including teachers, staff, students, and community members will be done with our engineering and architecture partners.
Please visit our Tax Impact webpage to view property tax charts and a calculator to determine the monthly and annual property tax impact.
A new school is estimated to cost approximately $32-$37 million. Fixing current infrastructure issues at the two current school sites (heating & ventilation, roofs, plumbing, electrical, etc.) is estimated to cost $18-$21 million. This would not have included any updating of our learning environments or areas of need such as secure entryways.
The 81,000 sq. ft. building would be built in the same general area as the current High School building. The Elementary School building will be sold or torn down.
The current Elementary School and High School would continue to operate in our existing buildings during the construction of the new school.
If the referendum is successful, planning and engineering will be completed for the new school during 2023 and 2024. Construction would take place in 2025 and 2026. We would plan to open the new school in September 2026.
The design of the new school, if the referendum is successful, will be a collaborative effort. Staff, student, and community input into the design of the new school is being planned. Further details will be coming soon.
If the referendum fails, small fixes and patching of the current school buildings will continue.
The current buildings are at the end of their useful life and will likely deteriorate further without significant changes that can only be accomplished with a bond referendum.
If the buildings deteriorate to the point that they are no longer usable and safe for learning, one or both buildings will need to permanently close in the next few years.
If the buildings are required to close, the district would be forced to move students to another school district for their education.
In 2017, Minnesota State Legislature conceived and passed the Ag2School tax credit program significantly reducing the tax burden on agricultural landowners.
This tax credit reduces burden for agricultural property owners on existing and future school building bonds
There is no application to receive the Ag2School credit.
The credit is reduced automatically on the agricultural landowner’s property tax bill.
Non-agricultural landowners (homeowners) will NOT see an increase in their taxes as a result of this tax credit – the burden for the credit is entirely paid by the State.
Please visit our A2gSchool Tax Credit webpage for more information.
If you own agricultural land, the State of Minnesota would pay for a large portion of the total Referendum project through the Ag2School Tax Credit program.
The Ag2School Tax Credit would pay for $16,215,000 of the total bond amount for construction of a new PK-12 school. That equates to over 43% of the project’s total cost!
This is an automatic 70% property tax credit for owners of agricultural land. (It does not include the house, garage, and one acre surrounding the agricultural homestead.)
The Ag2School Tax Credit is not a tax deduction – it is an automatic dollar-for-dollar credit with no application required.
Please visit our A2gSchool Tax Credit webpage for more information.