Major in Neuroscience, Biology and Premedical Studies
Minors in Business and Management
Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology
Major in Biomedical Engineering
Major in Biomedical Engineering
Minor in Computer Science
Adaptive defensive responses are essential for survival, allowing organisms to respond rapidly to potential threats. However, when these responses become dysregulated, particularly following trauma, they can manifest as persistent and maladaptive behaviors characteristic of disorders such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). In the United States, anxiety-related disorders affect a substantial portion of the population, highlighting the need to better understand how traumatic experiences alter behavioral regulation .
A central feature of PTSD is not simply heightened fear, but a disruption in how defensive behaviors are selected and expressed. Rather than flexibly transitioning between responses such as freezing, flight, or aggression based on context, individuals may exhibit rigid or exaggerated behavioral patterns following trauma exposure.
This study investigates how an acute trauma paradigm influences defensive behavior selection in mice. By comparing trauma-exposed animals to controls that undergo identical conditioning without additional stress, we isolate how trauma reshapes behavioral responses to threat. This behavioral framework provides a foundation for understanding how traumatic experiences bias defensive strategies, a hallmark feature of PTSD.
How does acute trauma exposure alter defensive behavioral responses following standardized fear conditioning?
Does trauma shift behavioral strategy toward more passive (freezing) or more reactive (aggressive) responses?
Subjects:
A total of 12 C57BL/6J mice (8–12 weeks old; 7 males and 5 females) were used. Mice were housed under standard laboratory conditions on a 12:12-hour light/dark cycle with ad libitum access to food and water. Subjects were assigned to two groups: Control (n = 6) or Trauma (n = 6). Prior to behavioral testing, mice were handled daily to reduce stress and ensure consistent behavioral performance.
Open Field Test:
Mice were placed in a square open-field arena and allowed to explore freely for 10 minutes. Total ambulation, number of entries into the center zone, and time spent thigmotactic were recorded. The OFT was conducted at baseline and again one week post-trauma to assess changes in anxiety-like behavior following fear conditioning.
Elevated Zero Maze:
Mice were placed on a circular elevated track consisting of two open and two enclosed quadrants for 5 minutes. Time spent in open areas, number of open-area entries, and latency to first open-area entry were recorded. The EZM was conducted at baseline and one week post-trauma to assess trait and post-trauma anxiety levels.
Fear Conditioning Model:
A 4-day paradigm was conducted across two distinct contexts. Context A was a clear, cylindrical plexiglass chamber with a smooth floor. Context B was a square enclosure with an electrical grid floor for foot shock delivery. On Day 1 (habituation), all mice were placed in Context A and received presentations of a serial compound stimulus (SCS) consisting of alternating tone and white noise pips with no shock. On Days 2–3 (conditioning), Trauma mice were placed in Context B and received 5 pairings of SCS followed by footshocks (0.3–0.9 mA, 1 sec); Control mice underwent identical handling in Context B without shock delivery. On Day 4 (recall), all mice were returned to Context B and presented with SCS only (5 trials) to assess fear memory retrieval.
Resident Intruder (RI) Test:
One week following fear conditioning, each subject mouse was tested in its home cage using the resident-intruder paradigm. A naive, weight-matched, same-sex intruder mouse was introduced into the resident's cage for 20 minutes. Sessions were video recorded and manually scored for aggressive behaviors including following, boxing, biting, pinning, and hostile digging, as well as social interaction time.
[Enter research/findings and discussion. Adjust title as needed.]
[Enter conclusions and future study. Adjust title as needed.]
The following is an image of poster presented at the 2026 Undergraduate Research Forum [remember to include alt text]
[Enter acknowledgements.]
[Enter refernces. Delete section if not applicable.]
This project supported the development of key professional competencies:
Critical Thinking: Designed and refined a two-phase experimental paradigm to isolate the behavioral effects of trauma exposure. Evaluated how differences in experimental conditions influence defensive behavior outcomes, ensuring alignment between research question, methodology, and interpretation.
Technology: Utilized behavioral tracking and analysis tools, as well as statistical software, to quantify and interpret experimental data. Leveraged digital platforms to organize, visualize, and present research findings.
Teamwork: Collaborated within a research team to conduct behavioral experiments, coordinate data collection, and ensure consistency in behavioral scoring. Contributed to shared responsibilities in experimental setup, execution, and analysis.
Communication: Synthesized complex behavioral findings into clear scientific narratives for presentation in a research poster and digital format. Translated experimental design and results into accessible language for both scientific and general audiences.
All procedures were approved by the Miami University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) under Protocol 1117.