Honors Biology and Pre-Medical studies major with a minor in Business
Class of 2029
Humanities Department
My utopian proposal idea sprouted from my first-year, first-semester emerging honors class with Dr. Oana Godeanu-Kenworthy titled AMS 180, "Imagining a Good Society?" In this class, my peers and I delved into and discussed at length several utopian visions of a good society through literature such as Brave New World by Aldous Huxley and The Handmaid's Tale by Margaret Atwood. To conclude this class, all students in AMS 180 reflected on the literature and class discussions and proposed a utopian research project that fits into one of the following categories: environmental, social, economic, political, or technological. Due to the highly modernized and technical world we live in, I proposed the idea of instituting a National Digital Detox Day through the scope of the government; thus, the following is my proposal on the very subject.
Figure 1: Image depicting a government figure unplugging the brain from an outlet.
Screen time is unavoidable, as our society has become intertwined with technology in the way we think and act. Even though technology can connect individuals virtually, it has inhibited connection. Excessive screen time is associated with increased anxiety, loneliness, and reduced well-being. Consequently, many people disconnect from the real world and choose to live within the parameters of their digital world for comfort and escape. Excessive screen time affects one’s physical and mental health, which limits individuals’ ability to reflect on the broader social problem: our growing inability to form genuine, face-to-face connections despite the greatly advancing technological world. To combat the effects of these social issues tied to screen time, I propose that the government implement a National Digital Detox Day: a mandated nationwide period that offers a pause and time to reflect away from technology.
For one day, as a federal holiday, all nonessential forms of technology—social media, streaming, video games, browsing sites, and entertainment applications—would be disconnected, and societies would dedicate this day to togetherness and self-reflection through community activities and interactions. This initiative parallels the classical utopian philosophy: fostering peace, stability, and welfare for the whole. Removing nonessential forms of technology will allow people a step back from screens and let them rediscover themselves and their relationships around them. In tandem, there would be more time spent together at the dinner table and more block parties; overall, individuals would be able to understand the value of being present. Without intentional actions between individuals in society, there is an erosion of happiness, and meaningful connections will cease to exist.
Technology is no longer a pastime for enjoyment; instead, it has become a harsh habit and issue encroaching on society. Now more than ever, society is increasingly digitalized; technology has not only shaped thought patterns but also human behavior and interaction with the modern world. For instance, the copious hours staring at screens have suppressed true human connection, leaving individuals with heightened dependence issues and loneliness. Screens have the power to be sources of mental stimulation and dissociation; thus, people retreat to these digital worlds at the expense of true face-to-face connections.
Firstly, screen time affects individuals in serious matters. In a Harvard Medical School publication, Debra Ruder reflects upon the neurological consequences of excessive screen exposure; consequently, she claims the effects include disrupted emotional regulation, weakened social processing, and increased susceptibility to anxiety. Ruder claims overstimulation from screens compels the mind to expect constant engagement and immediate reward, which reduces the capacity for sustained attention and periods of deliberation and reflection. The mental effect of screen time contributes to the widespread feelings of loneliness and disconnection. Excessive screen usage is not merely serendipitous but poses a real threat to the cognitive and emotional development of millions around the world.
It is evident digital addiction reflects a societal trend amongst the younger generation. Deniz Yaramış and Recep Ünal’s study on smartphones links digital dependency to traditional behavioral addictions. This study urges society to recognize the social crisis emerging from excessive screen time, as 40% of teenagers identify themselves as addicted to their phones. Their research alludes to the withdrawal symptoms and compulsive behaviors technology holds within all spheres of life. The study suggests a pivot toward digital detox strategies, such as structured breaks, which reduce addictive patterns and provide physiological benefits. As this issue extends to the younger generations, this is not just a preference but a norm in their environment and will only get worse with time.
To offset this societal trajectory, a National Digital Detox Day would be beneficial by providing a structured response to digital dependence through a connected and stable society. This initiative is beneficial and needed, but its implementation by the government is complex. Galvan and Newman’s article “The Digital Detox Paradox” warns that poorly designed detox interventions can be a catalyst for disaster, causing stress, anxiety, and increased desire for digital stimulation. By removing technology without structure, many will feel heightened feelings of disconnection and fear of missing out, as face-to-face interactions are out of the norm. Thus, Galvan and Newman’s research is pivotal for shaping the National Digital Detox Day. The day must emphasize purpose, community, and meaningful interactions for all. Rather than being a day for screens to be off, detox interventions—when cohesive and thoroughly implemented—improve the well-being of individuals, which is dire within society today.
The scientific evidence highlights that excessive amounts of screen time are a devastating and real issue that affects mental health, interpersonal relationships, and the stability of communities. Without thoughtful intervention, digital dependence will deepen, and future generations will fail to connect without a screen present; therefore, a National Digital Detox Day responds directly to this impending disaster.
To address the societal issue, a coordinated and thought-out solution is necessary. Voluntary detox attempts—while helpful at times—are limited because digital environments are designed to be stimulating and difficult to avoid day to day. Hence, a National Digital Detox Day would function similarly to the other public health interventions by the government and be a structured, community-supported pause that encourages reflection and conscious, healthy actions.
Small detox programs have set the foundations for the effectiveness of planned, large-scale digital breaks. Sharma claims these detox programs improve mindfulness, emotional clarity, and social presence between participants from around the world. The success of this global movement proves that a coordinated detox day can capture public attention and foster stability and healthier lifestyles for all nations if implemented structurally.
Likewise, even in short 24-hour detox programs, there are physiological benefits. Within the study “Unplugged for a Day,” there is evidence from all participants that a 24-hour break from technology has enhanced in-person conversations and mindfulness. In particular, one woman claimed, “I have a baby… I am a nursing mother… I like to check my social media accounts while feeding my baby. But today, as I decided to remain offline while nursing, I kissed my child, looked at her face, and caressed her head… I realized that I had missed many precious moments with her.” Thus, the study brought many participants to greater awareness of their surroundings and emotions. The small detox programs mirror the hopeful outcome of the National Digital Detox Day: restoring true human connection that has been interrupted by digital technology.
Critics argue that government-led detox efforts would be intrusive personally; however, several implementations in other nations exemplify a great deal of beneficial effects. The Hong Kong government intervened in schools for children with high levels of myopia, creating mandatory outdoor time away from screens in schools. This aided in the reversal of the rising rates of childhood myopia. Even though citizens questioned the police actions over children in the school setting, the intervention alluded to improvements in health that can occur when public health developments are cohesively implemented.
Government intervention in terms of digital dependence is essential for yielding promising benefits. In terms of a National Digital Detox Day, the government would enforce this holiday by turning off the technology screens and likewise offer alternative ideas to communities. It is important to note that emergency services, the healthcare system, and the government operations would still be in full effect. The University of Oxford suggests that instead of technology, individuals should have small gatherings like potlucks or larger gatherings like block parties. The government should follow these suggestions; consequently, the various community engagement options would lead to a solidified sense of community and improved well-being. A National Digital Detox Day would not interfere with essential communication; it would solely pause nonessential technology for one day for such collective benefits.
Screen time is not solely an individual issue; it is a collective societal pattern shaped by the environment in which we reside. Thus, a National Digital Detox Day instituted by the government would function to reclaim human connection where technology eroded it through community practices and interactions.
Given the rise of technology, many individuals in society have reshaped their lifestyles poorly to fit the changing world around them. The lifestyle changes include using technology as the main form of communication, endlessly scrolling given any break, or reaching for a phone just to have it as a security blanket. By implementing a detox day, society can have increased personal connections and meaningful interactions with others through face-to-face interactions, which link to an improved well-being and a better community. As individuals change their ways to produce a better life, the National Digital Detox Day exemplifies the foundations of utopias: reflecting stability, community, and mutual well-being.
Thomas More emphasizes social harmony and the importance of structuring society to be moral and virtuous. Particularly, in More’s vision—through his novel, Utopia—societies flourish when they cultivate balance. These foundations discourage excess and reinforce the conditions that lead to a connected lifestyle, like National Digital Detox Day. To parallel, this day allows individuals to rediscover community together.
Additionally, Alif Ibrahim directly critiques the modern assumptions regarding technology alone being able to deliver societies to utopias. Several corporations promise happiness and community through platforms, but the reality is increased isolation, which blinds society to their harmful nature. Instituting a National Digital Detox Day offers a period of reflection and returns society to a more grounded utopian principle: balance. Technology will not save society; the initiative acknowledges that the nation requires community through meaningful connections, which stems from balance.
Moreover, Srivastava’s journal on posthuman utopias explores the technological systems that are meant to reshape identity and community relationships. Her work reinforces that achieving utopia does not mean rejecting technology but integrating the ways that preserve human nature. A National Digital Detox Day aligns with the vision of establishing an initiative that prevents technology from overtaking human nature, which is the course it is taking. Instead, this day encourages humans to remain more conscious in their digital environments than to be reshaped by algorithms and technology.
This proposal is practical and grounded in research from the past and present. This day merely asks individuals to reclaim personal agency and consciousness that technology has concealed. When those of society deliberate upon lifestyle choices, there can be more attention and awareness towards relationships and emotional well-being.
A National Digital Detox Day responds to the leading issues of the present: the erosion of human connection due to the technological world. Several studies have evoked the idea of the cognitive and mental toll of having excessive screen time on all communities. Similarly, studies confirm the notion that detox programs improve mental clarity, mindfulness, and interpersonal relationships. Thus, a nationwide government-led public health day should model a successful, large-scale behavioral change.
As this day is rooted in utopian ideals, this proposal offers a realistic path towards rebuilding social connections. For one day each year, society should pause the noise of technology and focus on those around them to rediscover the beauty in the present. In the hope that this day would cultivate a more grounded and empathetic community.
As society grows to be heavily intertwined with technology, this day would help restore what technology has inhibited: the idea of being present and together in human nature. This day can be utilized as a catalyst to guide society toward a more connected, balanced, and utopian future. As a society, if we have a day that requires us to put down our phones, we will realize what many have forgotten: the beauty that is all around.
More, Thomas. Utopia. Oxford University Press, 2025.
Deniz Yaramış, and Recep Ünal. “Addressing Digital Addiction Among University Students: A
Study of Digital Detox Techniques in Smartphone and Social Media Addiction.” Yeni Medya (Online), no. 17, 2024, pp. 55–67. https://doi.org/10.55609/yenimedya.1510369.
Galvan, Emma G., and Christopher L. Newman. “The Digital Detox Paradox: Potential Backfire
Effects of Digital Detox Interventions on Consumer Digital Well-Being.” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, vol. 44, no. 4, 2025, pp. 579–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/07439156251322105.
Nischal, Ken K. “Government Instituted Public Health Policy for Myopia Control in
Schools—the Overlooked Variable in Myopia Prevention Interventions?” Eye (London), vol. 39, no. 1, 2025, pp. 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-024-03406-5.
Sayyidath, Bayana Beevi Ottamaliyakkal, and Sukanya B. Menon. “Unplugged for a Day: A
24-Hour Digital Detox Journey.” Industrial Psychiatry Journal, 2nd ed., vol. 34, no. 2, 2025, pp. 242–47. https://doi.org/10.4103/ipj.ipj_477_24.
Srivastava, Yashvi. “No Shortcuts to Posthuman Utopia: Religion, Technology, and Society in Amitav Ghosh’s The Calcutta Chromosome.” Journal of Comparative Literature & Aesthetics, vol. 48, no. 2, 2025, pp. 181–89.
Ibrahim, Alif. “Utopian Overreach.” Real Life, 4 Nov. 2019, reallifemag.com/utopian-overreach/.
Ruder, Debra Bradley. “Screen Time and the Brain.” Harvard Medical School, Harvard Health
Publishing, 19 June 2019, hms.harvard.edu/news/screen-time-brain.
Sharma, Dr. Neha. World Digital Detox Day: A Global Movement to Address Digital Dependency. 9
Apr. 2024. https://doi.org/10.31124/advance.171266968.84578728/v1.
Throughout this research and experience in AMS 180 (Imagining a Good Society?), I have honed my skills in teamwork, leadership, and critical thinking, which will be translated into my future career.