Anatomic description of C. borealis labral nerves
Majors: BS Biology; BA Music Performance; Pre-medical Studies
Class of 2027
Department of Biology, Miami University
Central pattern generators (CPGs) are circuits that generate rhythmic motor outputs which govern rhythmic behaviors. CPG core rhythmic activity is based on intrinsic and synaptic properties but can be altered by neuromodulators (Bucher et al., 2015). Neuromodulators can act on multiple levels: directly on the CPG circuit or indirectly modulating the circuit by acting on descending modulatory projection neurons (Marder and Bucher, 2006). There is much less known about indirect modulatory actions.
Here, I am examining a novel indirect pathway: sensory neurons that project through the paired labral nerves within the crustacean stomatogastric nervous system. The aim of this research is to trace the anatomical pathways of the labral nerve neurons and locate their cell bodies. Stimulation and recording from these nerves will then be used to further determine their actions, and the stimuli that activates these neurons.
Cell Bodies are consistently found in the labrum of C. borealis, branching from the paired labral nerves (lns). There are 5 identified locations of cell body populations within the crustacean labrum; however, each with varying numbers of individual neurons within each population. Cell body populations range from 1-5 neurons and there is slight variability among individuals for number and location.
Stimulate and record from the crustacean labral nerves
Identify the stimulus to which the labral neurons respond
Identify how a signal from the labral neurons affects the gastric mill rhythm
More information on the dissection methods, graphs of results, and cool pictures of the discovered cells.
Ryan Zielinski and Connor McCammon: Analysis
Dr. Killian: Help with Methylene Blue
Melissa Coleman: Discovered swallowing response
URA (ANC)
NIH NINDS 1R15NS128619 (DMB)
Bucher D, Haspel G, Golowasch J, and Nadim F (2015). eLS,.
Marder, E., & Bucher, D. (2006. Annu. Rev. Physiol., 69, 291–316.