February 2-6, 2026 | Savannah Resort Hotel, Angeles City, Pampanga
The FY 2025 Year-End Assessment and Multi-Year (2027–2028) Plan and Budget Preparation Workshop shall employ a structured and participatory methodology designed to ensure alignment, collaboration, and actionable outcomes. It was successfully conducted on February 2-6, 2026 at Savannah Resort Hotel, Pampanga. The activity brought together key officials, program coordinators, regional field office representatives, and partner agencies under the National Rice Program. It aimes to assess the program's overall performance for FY 2025, identify implementation gaps and challenges, and ensure the alignment of strategies and resiurce requirements for the MY 2027-2028 plan and budget cycle.
Day 1 marked the formal opening of the workshop, beginning with the arrival and registration of participants. The opening ceremony set the tone for the activity through messages of support and direction from the Undersecretary for Rice Industry Development. The keynote adress emphasized the government's priorities for strengthening the rice industry, improving productivity, and enhancing program delivery mechanisms.
A series of comprehensive presentations followed, focusing on the FY 2025 performance of the National Rice Program. These includes financial utilization, physical accomplishments, production outputs, and updates on the Rice Competitiveness Enhancement Fund (RCEF). Each presentation incorporated an open forum, enabling participants to raise concerns, clarify data, and share insights from field implementation.
Significant discussions also centered on the RCEF seed distribution system and protocols, highlighting operational improvements and addressing implementation bottlenecks. The day concluded with an advisory session on the preparation of the Multi-Year (2027-2028) Plan and Budget Proposals, providing participants with guidance on planning parameters, budgeting frameworks, and submission requirements.
The Annual Performance Award recognizes the outstanding efforts of regions, attached agencies, and bureaus based on the consolidated assessment of physical and financial accomplishments, implementation efficiency, quality of reports, and overall contribution to program outcomes. It honors their collective dedication and commitment in effectively delivering program interventions and achieving performance targets. Beyond recognition, the award aims to promote continuous improvement, accountability, and excellence in public service delivery.
The second day formally transitioned into workshop proper, starting with the presentation of the rationale, objectives, and mechanics. This session clarified expectations, timelines, and output requirements, ensuring that all participants were aligned with the workshop goals.
The bulk of the day was dedicated to Regional Field Office (RFO) presentations, where each region presented its accomplishments, best practices, issues encountered, and proposed interventions. The inclusion of open forums encouraged active engagement, allowing participants to exchange ideas, validate information, and provide constructive feedback.
These sessions played a critical role in surfacing region-specific concerns while identifying common challenges across areas, such as resource constraints, implementation delays, and operational inefficiencies.
On the third day, the RFO presentations continued, further strengthening the collaborative environment among participants. Emphasis was placed on data validation, consistency, and alignment of reported accomplishments with national targets.
The discussions enabled participants to refine their presentations, reconcile discrepancies, and ensure that proposed plans were evidence-based and responsive to actual field conditions. This process also facilitated the identification of priority interventions and areas requiring additional support or policy direction.
Overall, the day reinforced the importance of accurate reporting and strategic planning in achieving program objectives.
The fourth day marked the completion of all remaining presentations, including those from bureaus and RCEF Implementing Agencies (IAs). These presentations provided a broader perspective on program implementation, highlighting inter-agency coordination, support mechanisms, and complementary initiatives.
Following the presentations, participants transitioned into workshop sessions focused on refining the MY 2027–2028 plan and budget proposals. Working collaboratively, they integrated feedback gathered during previous sessions, aligned targets with national priorities, and ensured that proposed activities were feasible, results-oriented, and adequately resourced.
This phase emphasized teamwork, critical analysis, and strategic thinking, as participants worked to enhance the quality and coherence of their submissions.
The final day was dedicated to the completion, finalization, and submission of the refined plan and budget proposals. Participants consolidated their outputs, ensuring compliance with prescribed formats and guidelines.
A synthesis of the workshop was presented, summarizing key findings, major agreements, and strategic directions moving forward. The synthesis highlighted critical areas for improvement, priority interventions, and the collective commitment of stakeholders to strengthen program implementation.
The activity concluded with closing remarks, acknowledging the contributions of all participants and emphasizing the importance of sustained collaboration and accountability. Participants then departed with clear directions and actionable plans for the upcoming planning cycle.
The workshop successfully achieved its objectives of conducting a thorough FY 2025 performance assessment and facilitating the preparation of well-aligned and responsive MY 2027–2028 plans and budgets. It provided an effective platform for knowledge sharing, coordination, and consensus-building among stakeholders.
Key outcomes of the workshop include:
Enhanced understanding of program performance and implementation gaps
Strengthened alignment between regional and national priorities
Improved quality and coherence of plan and budget proposals
Reinforced collaboration among RFOs, bureaus, and partner agencies
Ultimately, the activity contributed to establishing a clear and strategic direction for the continued development and implementation of the National Rice Program.