The lecture portion of this course is an applied laboratory science. It includes the design of experiments, proper representation of quantitative measurements, and statistical evaluation of measurements. It also includes an introduction to chemical instrumentation, including gas and liquid chromatography, ion selective electrodes, and potentiometry. Theoretical concepts include complex equilibria such as precipitation, acid-base, and complexation reactions. Finally, the course examines the utility of redox chemistry for quantitative analysis using electrochemical cells and other electrochemical methods. The laboratory portion of this course is designed to correlate with the lecture topics above.
The course is required for a major in Chemistry, Biochemistry, or Microbiology (CLS option). It is also required for a minor in Chemistry or Biochemistry.
The lecture portion of this course has two asynchronous days and one synchronous day. On asynchronous days, students watched three or four videos I created using the Learning Glass studio in MLIB. Each video was 15–20 minutes long and were a mixture of theory and calculation problems. After watching the videos the students completed a worksheet created by the instructor or adapted from the “Active Learning” section of the Analytical Sciences Digital Library. During synchronous class periods, students accessed an editable student response slide deck (through Google slides or Jamboards). Each synchronous class began with SLOs and a few slides of traditional lecture from a separate slide deck. Then, students were assigned to groups of 4–5 students in breakout rooms. Each breakout room had an assigned recorder and a reporter. In the student response slide deck, there were as many copies of each individual problem slide as there were breakout rooms. Problems included calculations, explanations, sorting, labeling, and vocabulary activities. Students could choose to contribute verbally to their breakout room members, edit the slide directly, or use the chat feature in Zoom. I could visit a breakout room to provide verbal feedback or simultaneously monitor the progress of all groups by viewing and adding suggestions to the slides.
This course was organized with learning modules in Blackboard. Weekly, each module contained similar content:
a list of weekly SLOs
a list of activities for the week
links to recordings of each synchronous lecture
links to helpful resources
On the main Blackboard page, I also had a day-by-day table which contained
the main concepts under study
the assigned reading
links to Learning Glass videos
links to asynchronous class worksheets
reminders for upcoming events (exams, etc)
This course also has a significant laboratory component. Some of the labs were completed virtually, with students working up data provided to them for experiments they would have done. We are also part of the beta-testing group for the HHMI- and NSF-funded MICRO project for engaged at-home laboratory learning. Students completed four at-home labs over eight weeks, with materials prepared by the instructors and mailed to them at home.
Using the structure of group work on shared documents maintained much of the look, feel, and student interaction of a traditional in-person semester. Both the small group and whole class discussions were in general productive as previous in-person meetings. The students self-reported that they appreciated the chance to collaborate and have some normal social interactions while completing group work. Following reflection on the fall semester, I will also be implementing low-stakes pre-class assignments for each synchronous day to ensure the students are prepared for group work.
Students also engaged with each other to work via Zoom on MICRO labs; I frequently joined these Zoom sessions to help students work out the experimental design.
The peer-reviewed literature has shown that highly structured courses with more opportunities for low-stakes assessment are beneficial in STEM courses. As such, this course is structured to have low-stakes assessment through twice-weekly worksheets and weekly laboratory assignments. Combined, these two elements make up 49% of the total course grade. The remainder of the course grade comes from traditional high-stakes assessments in the form of hourly and final exams.
A major challenge for this course was trying to create a Quant community in the virtual environment. Each semester, the students taking Quant invariably team up and work hard together in self-selected groups to complete homework, laboratory reports, and exam preparation. It was difficult to replace the 6 hours of weekly lab time during which these connections are typically and easily forged. Students who knew each other from previous courses teamed up with each other, but transfer and/or more introverted students struggled to find adequate peer groups in Fall 2020. For the Spring 2021 semester I will work to implement:
A strong social and intellectual community on Currents (see below).
Office hours immediately following synchronous class hours, so all students are already "there" if they want to ask questions or just hang out and listen to other questions.
An introduction to like-minded students by self-selection of breakout room modality for synchronous classes
active – camera and microphones almost always on with active discussion
quiet – favor a mix of independent work and discussion with others but prefer not to continuously use camera and/or microphone
solo – strong preference to work on their own
I plan on using the Currents community extensively to promote student engagement with each other and a feeling of community. I will have students introduce themselves to each other there. I will only post the solutions to the class worksheets there, so students are obliged to visit. I will also use some low-stakes assignments in posing and responding to each other's questions on Currents. I hope to assign reading/commenting on reading through Perusall but I am not quite sure how that is going to work yet.