By Ari Shakked
Introduction:
The prevalence of food allergies (FA) in the United States has surged dramatically in the past few decades. 32 million Americans currently live with FA, where 5.6 million of them are children and teenagers. The likelihood of knowing someone with an allergy has exponentially increased, and safety measures are now a necessity in places from corporate offices to school classrooms. As such, research surrounding preventive methods has grown in popularity, with numerous approaches being discussed and analyzed in the hopes of bringing rates of FA down. Research exploring the root causes of FA is crucial to the path towards a decline, and only from there can adequate measures for prevention be produced.
My Project:
As someone who has been surrounded by food allergies and food allergy treatment for their whole life, food allergy prevention and treatment is of vital importance. I am partnering with Latitude Food Allergy Clinic and choosing to focus my project on potential predictors of oral food challenge (OFC) outcomes. Latitude has found that a high percentage of its patients who assume they have a certain allergen take food challenges that come back positive (meaning they are not allergic to the allergen being tested). This causes a build-up in the system, which doesn't allow Latitude and other clinics nationwide to add more patients who may desperately need oral immunotherapy to make their lives safer. As such, devising a standard that is based on patient data and past medical history for what determines if a patient needs to do an OFC would help to alleviate this unnecessary backup, and provide clinicians with guidance to improve patient safety and efficiency of the oral immunotherapy process.
My Research Question:
How can patient data and clinical history be used to predict OFC outcomes, and, in turn, make allergy diagnosis via OFC more efficient?
Read my research paper outlining my findings.
Watch my research presentation.