Publications

For an up-to-date listing of Carlisle Lab publications, and links, please visit Dr. Carlisle's Google Scholar Profile.

PUBLICATIONS

Zhang, Z. & Carlisle, N.B. Explicit Attentional Goals Unlock Implicit Spatial Statistical Learning. [In Press, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General] 

Zhao, K., Xie, H., Fonzo, G. A., Tong, X., Carlisle, N., Chidharom, M., Etkin, A., & Zhang, Y. Individualized fMRI connectivity defines signatures of antidepressant and placebo responses in major depression. [In Press, Molecular psychiatry}.

Zhang, Z. & Carlisle, N.B. (2023) Assessing recoding accounts of negative attentional templates using behavior and eye tracking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 49(4), 509-532.  link

Carlisle, N.B. (2023). Negative and positive templates: Two forms of cued attentional control. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 85, 585-595. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-022-02590-4

Zhang, Y., Tong, X., Xie, H. Carlisle, N.B., Fonzo, G., Oathes, D., & Jiang, J. (2022). Transdiagnostic connectome signatures from resting-state fMRI predict individual-level intellectual capacity. Translational Psychiatry, 12(1), 395. https://rdcu.be/c2K1K

Zhang, Z., Sahatdjian, R., & Carlisle, N. B. (2022). Benefits from negative templates in easy and difficult search depend on rapid distractor rejection and enhanced guidance. Vision Research, 197, 108031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2022.108031

Zhang, Z., Gaspelin, N., & Carlisle, N.B. (2020). Probing early attention following negative and positive templates. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.  82(3), 1166-1175. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-019-01864-8.  https://rdcu.be/cO4u0

Rajsic, J., Carlisle, N.B., & Woodman, G.W. (2020). What not to look for: Electrophysiological evidence that searchers prefer positive templates. Neuropsychologia, 140, 107376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107376

Geng, J., Won, B.-Y., & Carlisle, N.B. (2019). Distractor ignoring: Strategies, learning, and passive filtering. Current Directions in Psychological Science,  28 (6), 600-606.    https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419867099

Carlisle, N.B. & Woodman, G.F. (2019). Quantifying the attentional impact of working memory distractors using eye tracking. Visual Cognition, 27:5-8, 452-466. link

Carlisle, N.B., & Nitka, A.W. (2019).  Location-based explanations do not account for active attentional suppression. Visual Cognition,  27:3-4, 305-316, DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2018.1553222.

Carlisle, N.B. (2019). Flexibility in attentional control: Multiple sources and suppression. The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, 92(1), 103-113. link

Carlisle, N. B., & Kristjánsson, Á. (2018). How visual working memory contents influence priming of visual attention. Psychological research, 82(5), 833-839. link

Grubert, A., Carlisle, N.B., & Eimer, M. (2016). The control of single-colour and multiple-colour visual search by attentional templates in working memory and in long-term memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 28(12):1947-1963. link 

Judah, M.R., Grant, D.M., Carlisle, N.B. (2016). The effects of self-focus on attentional biases in social anxiety: An ERP study. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 16 (3), 393-405.  link

Reinhart, R., Carlisle, N.B., & Woodman, G.F. (2014). Visual working memory gives up attentional control early in learning: Ruling out inter-hemispheric cancellation. Psychophysiology, 51 (8), 800-804. link

Carlisle, N.B. & Woodman, G.F. (2013).  Reconciling conflicting electrophysiological findings on the guidance of attention by working memory. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75 (7), 1330-1335. link

Williams, M., Hong, S.W., Kang, M.-S., Carlisle, N.B., & Woodman, G.F. (2013). The benefit of forgetting. Psych Bulletin and Review, 20, 348-355. link

Woodman, G.F., Carlisle, N.B., & Reinhart, R. M. G. (2013).  Where do we store the representations that guide working memory? Journal of Vision. 13(3), 1-17. link

Arita, J.T., Carlisle, N.B., & Woodman, G.F. (2012).  Templates for rejection: Configuring attention to ignore task-irrelevant features.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(3), 580-584. link

Reinhart, R.M.G., Carlisle, N.B., Kang, M.S., & Woodman, G.F. (2012). Event-related potentials elicited by errors during the stop-signal task. II: Human effector specific error responses.  Journal of Neurophysiology, 107(10), 2794-807. link

Carlisle, N.B.,  Arita, J.T., Pardo, D., & Woodman, G.F. (2011).  Attentional templates in visual working memory. Journal of Neuroscience, 31(25), 9315-9322. link

Carlisle, N.B. & Woodman, G.F. (2011). When memory is not enough: Electrophysiological evidence for goal-dependent use of working memory representations in guiding visual attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(10), 2650-2664. link

Carlisle, N.B. & Woodman, G.F. (2011). Automatic and strategic effects in the guidance of attention by working memory representations.  Acta Psychologica, 137(2), 217-225. link