CAPES -2A, 2B, 2C, 2D, 3C, 4A, 5A, 5B, 5C, 6A
Overview
Describe the processess, forms, and/or documents that you used to guide pre-observation and post-observation meetings(e.g., teacher response forms, observation tools, student work products, next steps for professional growth)
Describe the processess, forms, and/or documents that you used to guide pre-observation and post-observation meetings(e.g., teacher response forms, observation tools, student work products, next steps for professional growth)
The processes that are used to guide pre-observation meetings are formulaic and denote clear expectations. The form that is utilized to formally evaluate a teacher is objective and reflective. The support provided is not sufficient. For example, the majority of the time the administrator needs to interpret the process in the most simplistic ways in order for the teacher to fully understand what is being asked from the observation. The opportunity for teachers to receive training is minimal and insufficient. Therefore, the teacher often seeks out colleagues who have gone through the process for assistance, guidance, and suggestions. The formal process is based on only one formal lesson that the teacher will present. Most of the process is about understanding the teacher’s goals, planning, and reflection throughout the school year. Moreso, if the teacher achieves evidence in the criteria he/she can be granted up to 5 years of not getting evaluated because they have carried through the evaluation cycle. The formal district evaluation platform consists of the teacher discussing his/her focus goals in the classroom for the school year. Then, the teacher describes the composition of the students’ language, academics, and if any IEP/504 are included in the process. The teacher then meets with the administrator and selects the content/subject that will be observed, the standard, and the objective that will be targeted. The lesson is then drafted and handed in before the lesson is delivered to the administrator. On the day of the observation, the administrator comes in at the allotted time and takes in a recording device to capture all of the lessons including capturing evidence of student work. After the lesson is delivered, the teacher meets with the administrator and shares the findings, outcomes, and performances given by the lesson delivery approach, strategy, and the student’s performance. The administrator then asks the teacher what they think about the lesson and states what would be different if the lesson would be done again. The teacher is then given the opportunity to share and provide any ideas, suggestions, and comments about what would have been different if the lesson would be done again. After two or three months later, the teacher is informally observed a couple of more times in other content areas. These observations are not discussed, just noted as dates and times in the formal observation. Towards the end of the school year, the teacher is then provided a final sharing with recommendations, and findings. The teacher is also granted either a satisfactory or unsatisfactory overall outcome with advance notice of when he/she will be evaluated again. If the teacher was granted satisfactory, he/she can be awarded up to five years of not getting evaluated. If they do not get satisfactory results, they may appeal the outcome or agree to be evaluated again the next school year. The other type of informal classroom observation forms that are utilized are check-off type forms, in which the criteria is very basic. It does not reference the CSTP’s nor any other teaching standards. The collection of data is based only on one platform that has been used in the last 10 years. It does not provide any formulaic anecdote to target the need. It is also not an effective practice since the data changes every 3 months and so by the time the teacher actually sees his/her data the new assessment needs to be administered. The school does promote teachers to be cognizant about the standards, best practices, and data but no actual constructive feedback is provided. The expectation is that the evaluation process itself will enhance teacher practice and improve effectiveness, and this in turn will lead to improved student learning and achievement.
REFLECTION
What are your coaching strengths and areas of growth? What would you do differently, why and how? Is there another coaching model/framework that you would have liked to use and if so why?
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS