Before having a debate, students have to know what it takes to make a debate run smoothly. There are some characteristics which need prior attention. First, in which setup is the debate taking place? There are several possibilities. Students search for resources to find out how to debate in a correct way. This stimulates their process of critical thinking. They summarize their findings and make a short presentation to their peers in class.
Second, students need to know how to formulate a good argument. Students search for resources to find out how to formulate a good argument. This stimulates their process of critical thinking. They summarize their findings and make a short presentation to their peers in class.
Third, students learn to recognize and to avoid logical fallacies during a debate. Students search for resources to find out how to avoid fallacies in an argument. This stimulates their process of critical thinking. They summarize their findings and make a short presentation to their peers in the classroom.
The students conduct a role play and do not speak in their own name. They debate with different points of views. Possible stakeholders / roles for students are:
Member of World Wildlife Fund (WWF)
Patient with epilepsy that cannot be treated yet
CEO of Pfizer (Pharma industry)
Member of Parliament for the European Green Party (EGP)
CEO of L'Oréal (Cosmetics industry)
Minister responsible for science
Minister responsible for health care
Minister responsible for animal welfare
Minister responsible for education
A parent of 3 small children
Scientist researching heart diseases (biomedical researcher)
A PETA (Animal Rights) Activist
A cleaning person that works with toxic products
An actor/actress that is allergic to certain cosmetics
A veterinarian
Students can also create a role for debating themselves.
Possible topics of discussion:
Has medical science made sufficient progress as a result of animal experiments carried out in the past? Do the advantages still outweigh the disadvantages?
There is a sudden global outbreak of flu that could possibly kill millions because there is no vaccine yet. Does this mean that more animal experiments should be carried out to enable the quick development of a vaccine?
The living conditions of animals in factory farms are far less humane than the conditions of laboratory animals. Despite this, eating meat is permitted. Is eating meat more important than progress in medicine?
Is a human being more important than an animal? Does it matter what kind of animal?
If one really disapproves of animal testing, should one also not accept drugs or other treatments that have been developed by means of animal testing?
An animal is not the same as a human. Can animal tests correctly predict what is to be expected in humans?
Is it more desirable to use mice rather than pigs?
Should everything be permitted in curing the most serious human diseases such as cancer?
Do humans have the right to use or kill animals, particularly if we breed them for that purpose?
Politicians should pay more attention to animal testing and increase funding for research on alternatives.
Medical progress cannot be achieved without animal testing. Progress made in the past was only possible as a result of animal testing.
Alternatives are still insufficiently used.
We should respect nature and not genetically modify laboratory animals.
If we don’t do it, it will surely be done somewhere else.
Although we do our utmost to ensure animal welfare in this country, other countries may think very differently about animal welfare, reaping the rewards of ignoring ethical considerations.
There are still so many drugs that are not available for everyone. We should do something about this before we develop new drugs without using animals.
What gives human beings the right to use animals as pets, production animals or laboratory animals? For what purposes can or can't we use them?
Do we want to keep everyone alive? Or should we accept the fact that not everyone dies at the same age and let nature take its course? And who has the right to make this decision?
Would you want to use a drug with unknown side effects? Would you want your parents to use this medication?
Mice are more appropriate for testing than dogs.
Why have China and the US recently changed their policy on animal testing for cosmetic products?
The Netherlands aims to phase out animal testing for safety of chemicals by 2025. They are an example for every country in the EU.
In a referendum in Switzerland in February 2022 the population voted not to ban animal testing by a big majority (79.7%). Why?
Alternatively, students can create their own debate topics.
The chairman proposes the topic that will be discussed. The timekeepers’ role is to keep track of time.
First phase: two teams of 3 students are allocated a position (in support and opposition of the question). The audience is silent.
Second phase: Students in the audience use Mentimeter to vote for the team who best supported their arguments.