Sewing was a basic life skill taught to all 19th-century girls at a very young age, whether they were rich or poor. Girls learned to sew at home from female relatives, at school, or both.
Middle- and upper-class girls who attended school often learned additional “fine” or “fancy” embroidering skills. They might put these skills to use decorating her family’s textiles to show their social standing.
Jessy Ann Spencer of Greene County created this sampler as a student in a school for girls when she was 13 years old. Schoolgirls created samplers like these as a way to show they had mastered plain and fancy sewing.
This sampler was created to show the maker’s plain sewing skills. It features patching, darning, a handmade button and buttonhole, handmade eyelets (a decorative loop), and a variety of useful stitches.
Sewing was such a basic part of 19th century women’s lives that the word “work” was equivalent with “sewing.” So, women stored their sewing supplies and tools and sewing tools in “work” baskets and sewed at “work” tables.
Sewing table
c. 1845
Walnut
Gift of Mrs. William T. Lusk
Just as almost all 19th century women knew how to sew, almost all of them had a “work basket” in which they stored their sewing tools and notions.
This work basket and all the tools in it belonged to Anna DeGroff of Lake County. In addition to thread, buttons, and needles, it contained many other useful items:
clips for marking hems
several crochet hooks
chalk for marking alterations
an emery bag for sharpening sewing needles
wax for smoothing and strengthening thread.
Anna also kept a poem clipped from a magazine in her work basket, suggesting it was something special to her that she wanted to see every day as she sewed.
Sewing by hand could be a social activity for women. Often women sewed at night in the company of their family while someone else read aloud. They might also gather with friends to sew. Rose Kent of DeWitt County used this rocker while sewing for her family in the 1890s.
Women often sewed their own personal linens as well as their children’s clothing. Helen Hume sewed this chemise for herself in 1871.
Commercially-made clothing patterns first became available in the 1850s. Early patterns did not come in different sizes. They were meant only as a cutting guide for pieces that would still need to be fitted to the individual.
Ebeneezer Butterick introduced the first paper women’s dress patterns with sizes in 1866. By the 1880s, sized dress patterns and dressmakers’ drafting systems were widely available to home sewers. These were tools used to design and fit clothing to a person. They were used by rich and poor, urban and rural women. They helped to make fashion more widely accessible by providing an array of style choices for women on any budget and in any location.
The clumsy construction of this bodice shows that it might have been made by a home sewer who used a commercial pattern and not by a professional dressmaker. The buttonholes were cut too far apart, which caused a wrinkle between the lowest two buttons.
Isaac Singer patented his sewing machine in 1851. Heavy and expensive, the early machines were most often used in garment factories and tailors’ shops. By the 1870s, improvements in design, lower prices, and marketing made sewing machines fixtures in middle-class homes.
Dressmakers were highly skilled workers. They designed, measured, cut, basted, sewed, trimmed, and pressed clothing for their customers or clients. Working as independent businesswomen, they visited clients in their homes to sew. A dressmaker received good wages, room and board, and the dignity of being addressed by the title “Miss” or “Mrs.” rather than by their first name. The most successful dressmakers opened their own shops and employed assistants.
Dressmaking provided talented needlewomen a path to success and independence. For skilled immigrant, African American, and working-class women, dressmaking was a well-paid, high-status alternative to factory or service jobs. For unmarried or widowed middle-class women, it offered a way to support oneself independent of a husband.
Bridget Fogarty of Tazewell County hired local dressmaker Miss Graham to make this dress for her wedding. Like many women on a budget, Bridget likely made many of her own garments but hired a dressmaker to make clothing for special occasions.
Sponsored by Kate Wilson
Most women who supported themselves by sewing in the 19th century were seamstresses. They worked in the growing ready-made clothing industry. Unlike dressmakers, seamstresses did only plain sewing. They were considered unskilled workers and paid accordingly.
Widows, wives of disabled husbands, and abandoned wives with small children to care for generally did piecework for clothing manufacturers under the “putting out” system. They would pick up bundles of precut fabric from companies. In their own homes, they would sew together, line, trim, wash, press, and fold these garments before returning them to the company.
Unmarried seamstresses tended to work outside the home in factories. Many worked in “sweatshops,” small workshops that employed workers under unfair and unsafe conditions.
All seamstresses, whether they worked “in” or “out,” were part of an industry that made its profits by paying its workers very little.
Shirtwaist
c. 1900
Cotton
Transfer from University of Illinois
This “shirtwaist” blouse was likely created by a seamstress working long hours for low pay in a factory or sweatshop. The birth of the ready-made garment industry changed the way people acquired and cared for their clothing. It also marked the start of the unfair work conditions in “fast fashion” that continue to the present day.