Community security as a Subset of mortal security is defined as protection against the breakdown of communities, as a result of loss of traditional connections and values, and from insular and ethnical violence (UNDP 1994).
The UNDP’s 1994 Human Development Report specifically looks at the security of ethnical nonages and indigenous groups. Pitfalls to community security can come from several factors. These include unfairness, rejection from other groups and pitfalls from the state.
The more recent 2009 UNDP publication, Community security and social Solidarity Towards a UNDP approach provides a more distended notion of community security which combines both group and particular security, while centering largely on freedom from fear. troubles to particular and group security can include troubles from the state( physical torture), pitfalls from other countries in the case of war, pitfalls from other groups of people( ethnical pressure), pitfalls from individual or gangs pitfalls directed against women( rape, domestic violence), pitfalls directed at children( child abuse), and pitfalls to tone( self-murder, medicine use)( UNDP 2009).
One observes that the rearmost UNDP description of community security is no longer just confined to ethnical nonages but also to women and children who are considered among the most vulnerable groups. And, while the emphasis of community security is on freedom from fear, there's also recognition of the significance of responding to a wider range of social issues that impact community freedom from want UNDP 2009).
Security is as important as anything differently commodity we witness. Thus Community Security can also be seen as an end state whereby people feel defended and valued as members of society. This end state is achieved when the processes behind Community Security are performing or rather the mechanisms to insure communities can articulate their security needs live in confluence with the original and institutional capacity and wish to respond to them.
It sets out the objectives of Safer world’s Community Security work, explains why we see it as important, and draws together a significant body of learning and experience that ties together the theory and practice behind connected peace, conflict, security and development interventions.
This Community Security text provides a methodology that's important for peace, security and development progress, because it allows communities to define and apply interventions acclimatized to their exact requirements and precedence and in this way helps communities find creative, collaborative and precautionary results to security challenge, including.
• Weak/ poor state – citizen relations.
• Exorbitantly state- centric models and views of security.
• Lack of institutional coffers and capacity.
• Lack of active citizenship and public engagement on issues related to security and justice.
• Challenges in fostering genuine responsibility and political impulses for security and justice reform.
• Pressures within and between communities, particularly involving marginalized group lack decent openings for income generation and better livelihoods.
• Gender inequality and its implicit to feed into gender- grounded violence and gender- related conflict dynamics.
• Lack of effective models for furnishing security, including poor rule of law and access to justice at the original position.
• The need to decentralize, or extend the reach of, security and justice provision whilst maintaining values and accountability.
• The need to reintegrate former combatants into communities.
• The need to anticipate tensions and security challenges and work on them preventatively and constructively.