Member Publications

Andrew Piper, Professor and William Dawson Scholar; Department of Languages, Literatures, and Cultures; McGill University

  • Piper, A., & Jean So, R. (under review). Inequality: A useful category for literary and cultural analysis.
  • Kraicer, E., & Piper, A. (2019). Social characters: The hierarchy of gender in contemporary English-language fiction," Journal of Cultural Analytics.
  • Piper, A. (2018). Enumerations: Data and Literary Study.
  • Piper, A. (2017). Think small: On literary modeling. PMLA 132(3), 651-658.
  • Piper, A. (2016). Fictionality. Journal of Cultural Analytics DOI: 10.22148/16.011
  • Piper, A., & Portelance, E. (2016). How Cultural Capital Works: Prizewinning Novels, Bestsellers, and the Time of Reading. Post45.
  • Piper, A. (2015). Novel devotions: Conversional reading, computational modeling, and the modern novel.” New Literary History, 46(1), 63-98.

Arthur Jacobs, Professor of Experimental and Neurocognitive Psychology, Dahlem Institute for Neuroimaging of Emotion (D.I.N.E.), Freie Universität Berlin (FUB)

  • Jacobs, A. M. (2015). Neurocognitive poetics: methods and models for investigating the neuronal and cognitive-affective bases of literature reception. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 9:186. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00186
  • Jacobs, A. M. (2018a). The Gutenberg English Poetry Corpus: Exemplary quantitative narrative analyses. Front. Digit. Humanit. 5:5. doi: 10.3389/fdigh.2018.00005
  • Jacobs, A. M. (2018b). (Neuro-)Cognitive poetics and computational stylistics. Scientific Study of Literature, 8(1), 164-207. https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.18002.jac.
  • Jacobs, A. M., & Kinder, A. (2017). The brain is the prisoner of thought: A machine-learning assisted quantitative narrative analysis of literary metaphors for use in Neurocognitive Poetics. Metaphor and Symbol, 32(3), 139-160, DOI: 10.1080/10926488.2017.1338015
  • Jacobs, A. M., & Kinder, A. (2018). What makes a metaphor literary? Answers from two computational studies, Metaphor and Symbol, 33(2), 85-100, DOI: 10.1080/10926488.2018.1434943
  • Schrott, R., & Jacobs, A. M. (2011). Gehirn und Gedicht: Wie wir unsere Wirklichkeiten konstruieren (Brain and poetry: How we construct our realities). München: Hanser.
  • Jacobs, A. M. (2017). Quantifying the beauty of words: A neurocognitive poetics perspective. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 11:622. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00622

Karina van Dalen-Oskam, Head of the Department of literary studies, Huygens Institute for the History of the Netherlands; Professor in Computational Literary Studies, the University of Amsterdam

  • Riddell, A., & van Dalen-Oskam, K. (2018). Readers and their roles: Evidence from readers of contemporary fiction in the Netherlands. PLOS ONE, 13(7), e0201157. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201157
  • Does, J. de, Depuydt, K., van Dalen-Oskam, K. van, & Marx, M. (2017). Namescape: Named Entity Recognition from a Literary Perspective. Ubiquity Press. https://doi.org/10.5334/bbi.30
  • van Dalen-Oskam, K. (2017). Corpus-based approaches to names in literature. In: C. Hough (Ed), The Oxford Handbook of Names and Naming (p. 344-354). Oxford University Press.
  • J.B. Herrmann, Van Dalen-Oskam, K., & Schöch, C. (2015). Revisiting style, a key concept in literary studies. Journal of Literary Theory, 9, 25-52.
  • van Dalen-Oskam, K. (2015). In praise of the variant analysis tool. A computational approach to medieval literature. In: André Lardinois, Sophie Levie, Hans Hoeken and Christoph Lüthy (Eds), Texts, Transmissions, Receptions: Modern Approaches to Narratives (p. 35-54). Leiden: Brill. http://booksandjournals.brillonline.com/content/books/9789004270848

J. Berenike Herrmann, Senior Research and Teaching Associate at the Digital Humanities Lab, Basel University

  • Herrmann, J. B., Woll, K., & Dorst. A. G (accepted). Linguistic Metaphor Identification in German. In: Nacey, S., Dorst, A.G., Krennmayr, T., & W.G. Reijnierse (Hg.). MIPVU in Multiple Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Rebora, S., Herrmann, J. B., Lauer, G., & Salgaro, M. (2018). Robert Musil, a War Journal, and Stylometry: Tackling the Issue of Short Texts in Authorship Attribution. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, fqy055, https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqy055
  • Herrmann, J. B. (2017). In a test bed with Kafka. Introducing a mixed-method approach to digital stylistics, in: Chambers, S., Jones, C., Kestemont, M., Koolen, M., & J. van Zundert (Hg.). Special Issue DHBenelux 2015, Digital Humanities Quarterly, 11(4). http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/11/4/000341/000341.html
  • Herrmann, J. B., van Dalen-Oskam, K. & Schöch, C. (2015). Revisiting style, a key concept in literary studies. Journal of Literary Theory 9(1), 25-52.
  • Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T. (2010). A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 14]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.