Submissions
[WORKSHOP NOT CONFIRMED]
< The workshop cannot be confirmed due to an insufficient number of contributions >
[WORKSHOP NOT CONFIRMED]
< The workshop cannot be confirmed due to an insufficient number of contributions >
Call for Submissions
We welcome submissions of Original Research Articles, Reviews, and Perspectives that align with the specified themes, covering a wide range of theoretical and practical aspects, technologies, and systems.
Submissions should adhere to the Topics List and contribute novel insights, innovative methodologies, or practical applications that advance the fields of health and medicine. We encourage papers that showcase cutting-edge research, comprehensive reviews, and insightful perspectives on these critical areas.
All submissions must be original, unpublished, and not under consideration elsewhere. Papers should be written in English and must not have been published or accepted in any substantially similar form in peer-reviewed venues, including journals, conferences, or workshops.
Each submission will undergo a rigorous peer-review process conducted by the Organizers and the Technical Program Committee to ensure high-quality contributions.
Important Dates
Submission open: April 15th, 2025
Submission deadline: June 15th, 2025
Notification of acceptance: July 3rd, 2025
Camera-ready papers: July 10th, 2025
Format
Submitted papers must not exceed 12 pages (including references). Only original contributions that have not been previously published or simultaneously submitted to other venues will be considered for inclusion in the proceedings. All submissions should be made in PDF via the EasyChair system.
The accepted papers will be included in a joint Post-Workshop proceeding published by Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS), indexed in Web of Science; Scopus; EI Engineering Index; Google Scholar; DBLP; etc.
We suggest workshop papers are prepared and submitted using this template in LNCS format.
Review Process
Technical Program Committee members self-declare their expertise for papers (passing knowledge, knowledgeable, expert).
The review process will be double-blind. The goal of the review step is to provide a constructive evaluation of a submitted paper. Each paper will be reviewed and discussed between the Technical Program Committee members and the Organizers.
Therefore, submissions will be ranked based on criteria including relevance for the workshop, novelty/originality, significance, technical quality and correctness, quality, and clarity of presentation, quality of references and reproducibility.
Tentative Program Committee
Lucia Cascone, University of Salerno (Italy)
Giovanni Luca Masala, University of Kent (UK)
Chiara Marullo, ICAR-CNR (Italy)
Emanuele Damiano, ICAR-CNR (Italy)