Protocol

A society that transgresses its own rules of fairness eventually threatens the ecology of even its most powerful stakeholders. No human in real life has any individual right or duty they cannot publicly or privately exercise in practice.

All forms of governance are ultimately voluntary and depend on the organizational capacity of its members. Immutable ontology emerges from the iterative process, which informs consensus through verifiable outcomes. Thus, we can say with scientific certainty, based on the 4000 year history of the fulcrum scale as an accounting tool and symbol of fairness, that the immutable objective of governance is fairness; and the logic of fairness may be reduced to two imperatives with respect to life, liberty and property:

• • • Individual access to resources.

    • Public accountability for resources.

An immutable ontology of governance only exists in the logic of open governance fairness, which requires applying our best technology to provide open accounting for balancing the equal access and use of earth and human resources. Otherwise, it is impossible to claim that our rules of governance are valid, or that society has a fundamental interest in the open rule of law over closed arbitrary rule by dictators. Project priorities must align with an ontology of open governance. The open feedback Process must inform adoption and adaptation to fairness Protocol in all matters.

Work is only work if one has no choice but to work... for someone else.

In a social network that works, no one works... for all is fair in rotational fun and sortition merit. ACT now !

$olution$ Protocol (checklist)

key questions of protocol:

• • Does the community provide equal access to an iterative process of participatory open governance and public accounting for the fair use of human and natural resources?

  • Does the community provide open governance for the fair distribution of participatory Equal Time Value as it is contributed, or are activities based on future promises of land and housing security through trickle down money, loans and tax breaks?

  • Does the community provide equal security to meet everyone's equal need for the five (5) elements of Human Economic Purpose, based on the willingness and ability of each individual to participate?

  • Is everyone in the community informed of how to use a Common Resource Management System to account for ecosystem capacity, equal time value participation and competencies, how to resolve conflicts, coordinate responsibility rotation, and sortition allocation on the open source peer-to-peer decision-making platform?

Protocol Imperative:

The Protocol workgroup accounts for the development of protocols and applications that are most beneficial to Human Economic Purpose and life ecology; and stewards these data in open public forums, moderated by members from every location, for verifiable ranked-choice sense-making and peer-to-peer open source decision-making everywhere.