Even the best copy won't deliver the results you expect if:
π your message doesn't reach the right people, ready to take action
π you don't constantly work on increasing engagement
That's why your organization should constantly acquire new leads and test their quality. See if they're willing to do more than just sign a petition.Β
More engaged people = a greater chance they'll take action when you (and the animals) need it most.
That's exactly how it worked for us.Β We gathered people, learned their level of engagement, and my job was to use this information to plan an effective email campaign. And the stakes were high β a ban on fur farming in Poland, the world's second-largest fur producer.
This deep dive is focused on October 2025, the most intense month of the fur ban campaign (and the one I was responsible for when it comes to email planning).Β
You can check the whole timeline and details about mobilization in Ola Bujalska's deep dive on engagement building here.Β
Parliament session scheduled for 15-17 October 2025 - an unique chance to ban fur farming in Poland.
2 weeks to create maximum political pressure
154,000 people in our database with varying engagement levels
Second-largest fur producer globally = massive change for millions of animals
π₯ Main goal: 17,000 emails sent to MPs
π― Target outcome: 3,400 engaged supporters taking action via czasdzialania.pl
π Pressure pattern: Build up leading to the vote
TIMELINE β³
Early September
ποΈ Politicians return from summer break
π§ Start building pressure on Special Commission
CTA: Write to Special Commission members via dedicated page (misjadlazwierzat.pl)Β
Mid-September
β Protests in front of Sejm
Public pressure + media attention
Late September
π₯ New investigation released
Fresh footage from fur farms
Emotional ammunition for October campaign
October 1
π Launch new write-to page (czasdzialania.pl)
NEW CTA: Write to all 460 Sejm members
Shift from Commission β Full Parliament focus
October 7
π First reading of fur ban proposalΒ
Momentum building
Reminder about animals' suffering on fur farms
October 13
π΄ PEAK WEEK BEGINS
Maximum pressure campaign starts
All segments activated
"48 hours to change everything"
October 17
π VICTORY: Sejm votes in favor of fur ban
Historic win for animal welfare
π‘ The key idea: Writing to politicians is a tool to help animals.
The goal of the emails is to make people write to politicians but:
avoid getting into legislative process detailsΒ
avoid putting focus on politicians (and emotions they provoke - anger etc)Β
focus on showing how this CTA helps animalsΒ
focus on emotions (by writing about animals, not politicians)Β
focus on giving people the sense of agencyΒ
Main tactics:
1. Segmentation
Identification and segmentation of the audience based on their previous engagement levels (e.g., email opens, clicks, past participation).
Tailoring messages to different segments to ensure relevance and increase the likelihood of action.
Why? The most engaged people give us a bigger probability of taking action again so we need to βsaveβ them for the most crucial moments.
2. Pressure dosing - the peak moment is coming! Thatβs why we need to keep the pressure on politicians going. Before the PEAK, we need people to write to politicians regularly so they will see itβs not a one-time action. As we get closer to the vote, we need the pressure to grow and reach the PEAK.Β
1st week - warmup and steady pressureΒ
2nd week - growing pressure, building up the momentum leading to PEAK
3. Engaging narrative
Importance of the crucial moment (this is the moment you fought for so hard)Β Β
Time pressure (the vote will take place on Friday, only X days left to the big day)Β
Social proof (X people already sent emails to politicians, politicians got X messages)Β
Clear call to action - czasdzialania.plΒ
Urgency (politicians will vote soon, time to send your message is now)Β
Fear of lost opportunity (if you donβt take action now, this chance for animals may be lost forever)Β
Who: People who previously wrote to members of Special Commission via misjadlazwierzat.pl
Strategy: Reserved for critical moments
Communication: Recognition as the most engaged peopleΒ
Peak role: Maximum impact in final 48 hours
Who: Signed petition to ban fur farming but didn't take write-to actionΒ
Strategy: Intense emotional engagement
Communication: Clear single CTA - write to MPs
Peak role: Building momentum in week 2
Who: All other subscribers
Strategy: Awareness building and initial activation
Communication: Educational content with soft CTAs
Peak role: Creating baseline pressure in week 1
Here's the link to this document π
We had several people write the email content. To make their task easier and allow them to better tailor the message to maximize its potential to motivate the recipient to take action, I introduced a few guidelines during the planning phase.
1οΈβ£ The first was the target group, based on the previously established engagement pyramid. This allowed us to know how much context the recipient needed.
2οΈβ£ The second: one or two sentences about what the content of the email should be about. So, key moments, the most important updates, but also storytelling suggestions.
3οΈβ£ Third: the influence techique. We knew the messaging would be built on urgency, but I also wanted to add storytelling elements so the stories would really resonate with people.
I also planned reminders to people who visited the website but did not take action as a push for them to go back and send the messages.Β
π Link to full message
π Link to full message
π Link to full message
In this example, we didn't show any violent images. The pictures of tiny puppies in cages were far more disturbing than the blood and violence. We emphasized that we know that the supporters are aware of the realities of fur farms and their role is now to show politicians why this ban must be passed.
π Link to full message
Real person behind the messages.
The entire anti-fur campaign had a face β Marta Korzeniak, our activist and campaign coordinator.Β We wrote emails on her behalf.
This allowed supporters, especially those more engaged, to establish a certain emotional connection. Furthermore, a person, not an organization, helped build authenticity β Marta could express her emotions and share her experiences. Because Marta was actually present in the Sejm, attending sessions, and speaking with politicians, we were able to build authentic stories based on her reporting. This gave supporters the feeling that they were receiving firsthand information, sometimes even from behind the scenes.Β
We often added photos of Marta in our update emails to make it even more real. As in the example where Marta was present during the committee voting and kept supporters updated on the results.
16 October aka THE PEAKβ¨: 1931 people* sent 9485 emails to politicians! (*from all sources)Β
Newsletters got us 865 people and 4298 emails sent to politicans that day π
In total we got 5 555 action-takers who sent 32,878 emails to politicians. More than a half of them came from newsletter campaign π§
The main goal for the newsletter strategy was to get 17 000 emails sent by 3400 supporters. We did not meet this goal, but the estimates were quite close: 3063 supporters and 16687 emails sent. But most importantly, throughout the campaign, politicians frequently stated that the messages flooding their inboxes were impossible to ignore. Indeed, on the day of the Sejm vote, 339 MPs voted in favor of banning fur farming in Poland, with only 78 votes agains it.Β