Tai, (Brena) Yu-Chen Tai. “Hopeful Reading: Rethinking Resistance in Han Kang’s The Vegetarian.” College Literature, vol. 48, no. 4, Fall 2021, pp. 627-52. Project MUSE, muse.jhu.edu/article/835676.
Abstract:
Informed by feminist, queer, and decolonial scholarship, this article proposes an interpretative framework of hopeful reading to locate resistant forms of hope in South Korean writer Han Kang’s award-winning novel The Vegetarian, which is permeated with violence. Unlike mainstream positive thinking promoted by positive psychology that keeps the status quo intact, hopeful reading is rebellious, generative, and transformative in nature. Hopeful reading shifts the analytical focus from what disables one from acting in a hopeless situation to how one can be enabled to remain active in the very same situation. Applying this lens to analyze The Vegetarian, this article argues that hope is not ignited through suppressed women characters’ successful changes to continue what life used to be before violence. Instead, failing to properly resist or act turns out to facilitate the women characters to imagine and experiment with what their lives could have been or could become, which sparks the light of hope in the darkness of the novel.
Tai, (Brena) Yu-Chen Tai. “From Otherness to Otherwise: Gloria Anzaldúa’s Decolonial Aesthetics.” Concentric: Literary and Cultural Studies, vol. 47, no. 2, 2021, pp. 149-80, doi: 10.6240/concentric.lit.202109_47(2).0007. (A&HCI) http://www.concentric-literature.url.tw/issues/Shakespeare%20and%20Translation/7-Tai.pdf.
Abstract:
This article adopts a decolonial lens to explore leading Chicana feminist writer Gloria Anzaldúa’s aesthetics as an attempt to de-other and expand the field of Chicana literature, which receives less academic attention in Taiwan than other minority discourses. The article argues that the strangeness in Anzaldúa’s writings, which resist straightforward attempts to decipher them, results from the double nature of her endeavor. On the one hand, Anzaldúa decolonizes aesthetics by liberating non-rational sensibilities suppressed by the rational mind to broaden the scope of what counts as reality. On the other hand, she aestheticizes decoloniality by deploying experimental storytelling strategies to offer new languages for those residing in the cracks of the normative to narrate their subjectivities. Through this double movement, Anzaldúa’s decolonial aesthetics de-others those considered to be outcast, lesser, or alien, so we might recognize their ontological co-existence with us and the pluriversal world we live in. For Anzaldúa, the praxis of de-othering is not about familiarizing those marked as the other within an existing frame of meaning. Instead, as this article will show, to de-other is to desire an otherwise realm that opens up an alternative space-time where the multiplicity that the marginalized preserve and embody can be affirmed and appreciated.
Tai, (Brena) Yu-Chen. "Can-Go Girls: (Re)Making Neoliberal Ideal Girl Subjects through Round-the-World Travel." Women's Studies: An Inter-disciplinary Journal, vol. 49, no 6, 2020, pp. 596-615. Online advance, July 2020, doi: 10.1080/00497878.2020.1785882. (A&HCI). https://www.tandfonline.com/eprint/4N9QEUNPEZYXVDTVEQHC/full?target=10.1080/00497878.2020.1785882
Abstract:
This article takes Lost Girls World, a travel blog, as a case study to examine how round-the-world travel can serves as a productive site for “can-do girls,” in Anita Harris’s terms, to rework their neoliberal subjectivities when their identities are in crisis. Informed by girls’ studies and mobility studies, this article argues that privileged cosmopolitan mobility in the form of round-the-world travel facilitates neoliberalism to draw its temporarily lost ideal girl subjects back into its embrace. Such cosmopolitan mobility enables those “lost girls” to turn a set of binaries, including collectivity/ individuality, leisure/work, and consumption/ production, into continuums, in order to legitimatize their neoliberal subjectivities characterized by flexibility, individualism, and self-reinvention. The article contends that clinging to neoliberal rationality to resolve the constraints caused by neoliberalism is a doomed project. While neoliberal girl subjects are reinvented, normative discourses governed by neoliberalism are reproduced at the same time.
Tai, (Brena) Yu-Chen. “Healing Ecology in Aurora Levins Morales’s Writings on Environmental Illness.” Biopolitics, Necropolitics, Cosmopolitics, special issue of Journal of Gender Studies, vol. 29, no. 1, 2020, pp. 21-33. Online advance, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1080/09589236.2019.1692302. (SSCI)
https://www.tandfonline.com/eprint/IUKPU9XQKTSUA5QBHVIR/full?target=10.1080/09589236.2019.1692302
Abstract:
Toxicant increase and chemical consumption are normalized in industrial and neoliberal capitalism. Within this context, bodies with environmental illness [EI], also known as multiple chemical sensitivity [MCS] intolerant to common chemicals, are rendered illegitimate because the bodies expose illusionary safe zones delineated by the dominant society. To explore the subjectivities of people with EI, this article looks into U.S. Latina feminist writer Aurora Levins Morales's narratives on her multiple illnesses and disabilities collected in Kindling: Writings on the Body (2013). This article argues that Levins Morales adopts resistant storytelling to turn herself from an object of biomedical diagnosis to a subject of decolonial diagnosis. On the one hand, Levins Morales uses her bodily knowledge to reveal a toxic landscape that subjects bodies with EI to epistemic invalidation. On the other hand, she points to a healing politics that is guided by radical co-presence of bodies with various materializations. In the context of EI, healing is not about strengthening one’s ability to tolerate more toxins but to undergo cosmopolitical re-worlding. To re-world is to dare to think and live with different bodies side by side and contemporaneously by decolonizing the compartmentalization of differences imposed by structures of domination.
Tai, (Brena) Yu-Chen. “Atrocity, Alterity, Altar: A Theatrical Space of Healing in Humberto Robles’s ‘Women of Sand.’” Our Female Future, special issue of Concentric: Literary and Cultural Studies, vol. 45, no. 2, September 2019, pp. 83-111. (A&HCI)
http://www.concentric-literature.url.tw/issues/Our%20Female%20Future/4.pdf
Abstract:
Since 1993, more than a thousand women have been murdered in the border city of Ciudad Juárez in Mexico. To overcome the collective helplessness of their society, as evidenced by the Mexican government’s failure to stop the killing or to guarantee safety to its citizens, cultural producers began to carve out political space to respond to the Ciudad Juárez feminicide in their arts. This article looks into the feminist and coalitional politics manifested in Mexican playwright Humberto Robles’s unpublished documentary theater play “Women of Sand: Testimonies of Women in Ciudad Juárez,” reading the play as a theatrical altar in order to grasp both the subversive representation of Ciudad Juárez feminicide victims and the healing potential Robles hints at. Active remembering, the coalescence of heterogeneous voices, and spiritual activism are key strategies the play adopts to enact an altar arrayed with oppositional consciousness in the space of theater. Robles’s theatrical altar adheres to an “altar economics”to contest the patriarchal and neoliberal discourse of expendability that subjects women to violence. In this altar economics, the intrinsic value of feminicide victims takes priority over the external moral values imposed on them.
Tai, (Brena) Yu-Chen Tai. "The Ripple Imagery as a Decolonial Self: Exploring Multiplicity in Theresa Hak Kyung Cha's Dictée." Speaking Face to Face: The Visionary Philosophy of María Lugones, edited by Pedro J. DiPietro, Jennifer Mcweeny, and Shireen Roshanravan, SUNY Press, 2019, pp. 65-82. https://www.amazon.com/-/zh_TW/Speaking-Face-Visionary-Philosophy-Lugones/dp/1438474520/ref=tmm_pap_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=1590741606&sr=8-1