Alison Whitney Dec. 1, 2023
Group Members: Rook Bergeron, Nick Tinglof
Background: If you roll a bouncy ball and a bowling ball down a hill at the same time, which one will reach the bottom of the hill the fastest? If your answer is the bowling ball, then why? Possibly because it is larger and heavier than the bouncy ball, but how do we know that these factors change the speed of each ball at all. Now what if we add in a cylindrical water bottle. How would it compete with the balls? Would the shape make a difference?
When an object is rolling, spinning, or pivoting it is described to be in rotational motion. This concept has a unique set of parameters that is similar in principle to that of linear motion but includes additional variables. More specifically when using the conservation of energy to describe an object's movements, both the object's kinetic energy and its rotational kinetic energy must be considered when the object is rolling. Kinetic energy is described as the energy of an object in motion and defined by the object's mass and velocity. Rotational kinetic energy however, only takes into account the energy of the spinning motion of the object and is defined by the moment of inertia and the angular velocity. The moment of inertia is a measurement of mass and size, and is dependant on the shape of the object in question. For the rolling bouncy ball in the hypothetical situation above, the kinetic energy describes how the object is moving across the space while the rotation kinetic energy is describing the rolling motion of the bouncy ball.
The purpose of this experiment was to examine how radius, mass, and shape interact with the velocity of an object as it rolls down a ramp to determine which of the three factors influence the results. In order to accomplish this objective, 3 experiments have been developed (1) roll two objects with different radiuses down a ramp, (2) roll two objects with different masses down a ramp, and (3) roll two objects of different shapes down a ramp.
Methods:
Experiment 1 -
The radius of each object was measured using a ruler.
The two objects were lined up at the top of a ramp with a height of 0.205 m.
At the same time, the objects were released from rest and the object that reached the bottom of the ramp the fastest was recorded.
Experiment 2 -
The mass of each object was measured using a scale.
The two objects were lined up at the top of a ramp with a height of 0.205 m.
At the same time, the objects were released from rest and the object that reached the bottom of the ramp the fastest was recorded.
Experiment 3 -
Two objects with different shapes were selected for the experiment; one cylindrical shell and one solid cyliner/disk.
The two objects were lined up at the top of a ramp with a height of 0.205 m.
At the same time, the objects were released from rest and the object that reached the bottom of the ramp the fastest was recorded.
Ramp real-world trial
Ramp real-world trial
Ramp real-world trial
Equations:
Moment of Inertia cylindrical shell = I = mr^2
Moment of Inertia solid cylinder = I = 1/2 mr^2
Moment of Inertia sphere = I = 2/5 mr^2
KE = 1/2 mv^2
KE rotational = 1/2 Iw^2
Potential gravitational energy = mgh
Raw Calculations
Raw Calculations
Raw Calculations
Raw Data:
Experiment 1:
Radius 1 = 0.025 m Radius 2 = 0.020 m
Experiment 2:
Mass 1 = 0.579 kg Mass 2 = 0.046 kg
Experiment 3:
Shape 1 = cylinder shell Shape 2 = solid cylinder
Results:
Experiment 1:
Predicted Result - the two objects will reach the bottom of the ramp at the same time
Observed Result - object 1 with the larger radius reached the bottom of the ramp before object 2
Experiment 2:
Predicted Result - the two objects will reach the bottom of the ramp at the same time
Observed Result - object 1 with the larger mass reached the bottom of the ramp before object 2
Experiment 3:
Predicted Result - the solid cylinder will reach the bottom of the ramp before the cylindrical shell
Observed Result - the solid cylinder reached the bottom of the ramp before the cylindrical shell
Discussion: Based off of the predicted results and the equations that were developed for each trial, only the shape of the objects will impact the outcome of the trials. However, this was not the case when the experiments were carried out in the real world scenario. In experiment 1, the object with the larger radius reached the bottom of the ramp before the object with the smaller radius when they were predicted to be the same. This was likely a result of uneven rolling patterns down the ramp and the non-conserved work of friction on each of the objects. In experiment 2, the object with the larger mass reached the bottom of the ramp before the object with the smaller mass when they were expected to be equal. However, when examining the video, there was a substantial wobble in the object with the smaller mass which would account for the slower velocity. Finally, in experiment three it was observed that the solid cylinder reached the bottom of the ramp before the cylindrical shell which aligned with the anticipated outcomes. This agreement meant that the outcome of the experiment was that only the shape of the object changed the velocity of each object as they rolled down a ramp. There is room for future experimentation in exploring the objects used in the radius and mass trials to limit the disconnect between the predicted and observed outcomes.
Error: In addition to the differences in experiments 1 and 2 discussed above, there was an error made in experiment 2. After the experiment was completed, it was noticed that the objects used in experiment 2 had a different mass but also had a different radius. Given the results of experiment 1, the different radius would not impact the outcome of the trial. However, in order for the experiment to be scientifically reliable, the objects should have had the same radius with a different mass so that only one factor is changing at a time. Even though it was not caught in time for this experiment, future studies should ensure that all control variables are being kept consistent.