Mrs. Sydney Olson
AP US Government
US Government Honors/ Standard
Contact Information
Google Voice: 407-440-1592
E-Mail: solson@flvs.netÂ
Appointment Scheduler: https://olsonsydney.youcanbook.me/Â
 College Board Course OverviewÂ
AP U.S. Government and Politics provides a college-level, nonpartisan introduction to key political concepts, ideas, institutions, policies, interactions, roles, and behaviors that characterize the constitutional system and political culture of the United States. Students will study U.S. foundational documents, Supreme Court decisions, and other texts and visuals to gain an understanding of the relationships and interactions among political institutions, processes, and behaviors. Underpinning the required content of the course are several big ideas that allow students to create meaningful connections among concepts throughout the course. Students will also engage in skill development that requires them to read and interpret data, make comparisons and applications, and develop evidence-based arguments. In addition, they will complete a political science research or applied civics project.Â
Unit 1: Foundations of American Democracy (15-22% of exam)
Unit 2: Interactions Among Branches of Government (25-36% of exam)
Unit 3: Civil Liberties and Civil Rights (13-18% of exam)
Unit 4: American Political Ideologies and Beliefs (10-15% of exam)
Unit 5: Political Participation (20-27% of exam)
AP US Government Exam Information
Multiple Choice (1 hour and 20 minutes)Â
50% of Exam score
55 multiple choice questions
Individual questions (no stimulus): ~30
Set based questions (with stimulus) ~25
Quantitative Analysis: Analysis and application of quantitative-based source material
Qualitative Analysis: Analysis and application of text-based (primary and secondary) sources
Visual Analysis: Analysis and application of qualitative visual information
50% Free Response Question (1 hour and 40 minutes)
50% of Exam score
Q1- Concept Application (~20 minutes)
Respond to a political scenario, describe and explain the effects of a political institution, behavior, or process
Q2- Quantitative Analysis (~20 minutes)
Analyze quantitative data, identify a trend or pattern, or draw a conclusion from a visual representation and explain how it relates to a political principle, institution, process, policy, or behavior
Q3- SCOTUS Comparison (~20 minutes)
Compare a nonrequired Supreme Court case with a required Supreme Court case, explaining how information from the required case is relevant to the nonrequired one
Q4- Argument Essay (~40 points)
Develop an argument in the form of an essay, using evidence from required foundational documents and course concepts
Exam Information / Practice on Bluebook
Other Practice Exams
Score Distribution: 2025 / 2024 / 2023Â
How to ACE your Free Response Questions
Q1- Concept Application (~20 minutes)
How to write Concept Application Review Video / Example
Q2- Quantitative Analysis (~20 minutes)
How to write Quantitative Analysis Review Video / Example
Q3- SCOTUS Comparison (~20 minutes)
How to write SCOTUS Comparison Review Video / Example
Q4- Argument Essay (~40 points)
How to write Argument Essay Review Video / How to earn your Thesis Point / Example
Looking back at past exams..Â
📝2025 Free Response Questions (Set 1)
Explanation of 2025 FRQ'sÂ
📝2024 Free Response Questions (Set 1)
Explanation of 2024 FRQ'sÂ
📝2023 Free Response Questions  (Set 1)
Explanation of 2023 FRQ'sÂ
AP US Government Required Documents and Cases
Declaration of IndependenceÂ
The Declaration of Independence lays out the idea that legitimate governments derive their power from the consent of the governed and must protect natural rights such as life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. It argues that when a government becomes destructive of those rights, the people have the authority to alter or abolish it. It becomes a foundational statement of American political philosophy, especially for understanding popular sovereignty and limited government.
Primary Source / Review Video, 5:22Â
Articles of Confederation
The Articles of Confederation created the first national government, but it was a deliberately weak one in which most power remained with the states. Congress could make laws, conduct diplomacy, and wage war, but it had no power to tax, regulate interstate commerce, or enforce its decisions. This structure led to major problems—like financial instability and difficulty responding to crises such as Shays’ Rebellion.
Primary Source / Review Video, 7:05Â
United States ConstitutionÂ
The U.S. Constitution establishes a stronger national government than the Articles of Confederation by creating three separate branches—legislative, executive, and judicial—each with distinct powers and checks on the others. It outlines federalism by dividing authority between the national and state governments. The document also includes mechanisms for amendment, allowing the system to adapt over time. Overall, it provides the foundational framework for American government, emphasizing limited government, popular sovereignty, and the rule of law.
Primary Source / Review Video, 7:40Â
Federalist No. 10
Federalist No. 10, written by James Madison, argues that factions are inevitable in a free society because people naturally form groups based on shared interests. Instead of trying to eliminate factions, Madison explains that a large republic is the best way to control their effects, since it makes it harder for any single faction to dominate. He emphasizes that a diverse, extended republic forces compromise and protects minority rights.Â
Primary Source / Review Video, 7:47
Brutus No. 1Â
Brutus No. 1 argues that the proposed Constitution would create a national government too powerful and too distant from the people. The author warns that a large republic cannot adequately represent citizens and will inevitably lead to the erosion of individual liberties. He also fears that the Necessary and Proper Clause and Supremacy Clause would allow the federal government to overpower the states.Â
Primary Source / Review Video, 7:30
Federalist No. 51
Federalist No. 51 explains how the Constitution’s system of checks and balances and separation of powers prevents any one branch from becoming too powerful. Madison argues that because humans are not perfect, government must be structured so that each branch has the ability and incentive to limit the others. He also emphasizes that a compound republic—power divided between national and state governments—further protects individual rights. The essay ultimately defends the Constitution as a design that controls power by setting ambition against ambition.
Primary Source / Review Video, 5:59
Federalist No. 70 Â
Federalist No. 70, written by Alexander Hamilton, argues that an energetic, single executive is essential for good government. A lone president, he explains, can act with decisiveness, speed, and accountability—qualities that are harder to achieve with multiple leaders who might disagree or shift blame. Hamilton insists that unity in the executive branch strengthens national security, enforces laws more effectively, and makes it clear who is responsible for decisions. The essay ultimately defends the Constitution’s design of a single president as crucial for stability and effective governance.
Primary Source / Review Video, 7:02
Federalist No. 78 Â
Federalist No. 78, written by Alexander Hamilton, defends the structure and role of the federal judiciary under the Constitution. Hamilton argues that the judiciary is the “least dangerous branch” because it has neither the power of the purse nor the sword—only judgment. He emphasizes the importance of judicial independence, including life tenure, to protect courts from political pressure. The essay also lays the groundwork for judicial review, explaining that courts must strike down laws that violate the Constitution.
Primary Source / Review Video, 7:01
Letter From a Birmingham Jail
“Letter from a Birmingham Jail” explains Martin Luther King Jr.’s defense of nonviolent civil disobedience in the face of unjust laws. King argues that waiting for change only prolongs injustice and that individuals have a moral responsibility to challenge laws that violate basic rights. He criticizes white moderates for prioritizing order over justice and highlights the interconnectedness of all communities—“injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.” The letter ultimately lays out the constitutional and moral foundations for direct action in the civil rights movement.Â
Primary Source / Review Video, 6:59
Carey LaManna, 12:53
Mr. Carter's Study Guides, 43:07
McCulloch v. MarylandÂ
Supremacy Clause and Necessary and Proper Clause
📝In deciding this case about a national bank and state taxes, the court established supremacy of the U.S. Constitution and federal laws over state laws.Â
Street Law Summary / Review Video, 4:51
United States v. Lopez
Commerce Clause
📝Congress exceeded its power under the Commerce Clause when it made possession of a gun in a school zone a federal crime.Â
Street Law Summary / Review Video, 5:32
Marbury v. MadisonÂ
Judicial Review
📝In deciding this case about judicial appointments, the court established the principle of judicial review, empowering the Supreme Court to declare an act of the legislative or executive branch unconstitutional
 Street Law Summary / Review Video, 4:40
Baker v. CarrÂ
14th Amendment- Equal Protection Clause
📝This case held that redistricting did not raise political questions, allowing federal courts to hear other cases that challenge redistricting plans that may violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth AmendmentÂ
 Street Law Summary / Review Video, 5:19
Shaw v. Reno
14th Amendment- Equal Protection Clause
📝Under the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause, majority-minority districts, created under the Voting Rights Act of 1965, may be constitutionally challenged by voters if race is the only factor used in creating the districtÂ
Street Law Summary / Review Video, 4:28
Engel v. VitaleÂ
1st Amendment, Freedom of Religion- Establishment Clause
📝School sponsorship of religious activities violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.Â
Street Law Summary / Review Video, 3:47
Wisconsin v. Yoder
1st Amendment, Freedom of Religion- Free Exercise Clause
📝Compelling Amish students to attend school past the eighth grade violates the Free Exercise Clause of the First AmendmentÂ
 Street Law Summary / Review Video, 3:09
Schenck v. United States
1st Amendment, Freedom of Speech
📝Speech creating a “clear and present danger” was not protected by the First Amendment and could be limitedÂ
Street Law Summary / Review Video, 4:30
Tinker v. Des MoinesÂ
1st Amendment, Freedom of Speech (symbolic speech)
📝A prohibition against public school students wearing black armbands in school to protest the Vietnam War violated the students’ freedom of speech protections in the First Amendment.Â
Street Law Summary / Review Video, 4:11
New York Times v. United StatesÂ
1st Amendment, Freedom of Press
📝This case bolstered the freedom of the press protections of the First Amendment, establishing a “heavy presumption against prior restraint” even in cases involving national security.Â
Street Law Summary / Review Video, 3:08
McDonald v. Chicago
2nd Amendment + 14th Amendment- Due Process Clause
📝The Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms for self-defense is applicable to the statesÂ
 Street Law Summary / Review Video, 3:31
Gideon v. WainwrightÂ
6th Amendment + 14th Amendment- Due Process Clause
📝In this case, the Sixth Amendment’s right to an attorney extends procedural due process protections to felony defendants in state courts.Â
Street Law Summary / Review Video, 2:26
Brown v. Board of EducationÂ
14th Amendment- Equal Protection Clause
📝Race-based school segregation violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.Â
Street Law Summary / Review Video, 3:22
Citizens United v. FECÂ
1st Amendment, Freedom of Speech
📝Political spending by corporations, associations, and labor unions is a form of protected speech under the First Amendment.Â
Street Law Summary / Review Video, 6:41
Carey LaManna, 11:54
National Constitution Center, 37:59
AP US Government Review by Unit
Declaration of IndependenceÂ
Articles of ConfederationÂ
United States ConstitutionÂ
Federalist No. 10Â
Brutus No. 1
McCulloch v. Maryland
United States v. Lopez
Marbury v. Madison
Federalist No. 51Â
Federalist No. 70
Federalist No. 78Â
Baker v. Carr
Shaw v. Reno
Marbury v. Madison Â
Letter From a Birmingham JailÂ
Engel v. Vitale
Wisconsin v. Yoder
Schenck v. United States
Tinker v. Des Moines
New York Times v. United States
McDonald v. Chicago
Gideon v. Wainwright
Brown v. Board of Education
None
Citizens United v. FEC
New York Times v. United StatesÂ