Students build essential skills—communication, teamwork, and problem-solving—that mirror real-world demands.
Engagement deepens when students connect personally with content and take ownership of their learning.
Collaboration becomes natural as students work toward shared goals in authentic, meaningful contexts.
These peer-reviewed studies and expert insights support the foundation of my work with project-based learning (PBL), student collaboration, and identity-centered instruction:
A Study of the Impact of PBL on Student Learning Outcomes: Meta-analysis shows PBL significantly improves academic achievement, critical thinking, and student motivation. Best results come from small groups and 9–18 week projects.
PBL & Student Collaboration in Secondary Schools: Highlights how PBL strengthens communication, teamwork, and problem-solving—skills students developed in our True Crime unit.
The Power of PBL for Student Engagement: Finds that PBL boosts engagement by encouraging discussion, ownership, and shared learning—mirroring the dynamics I aimed to foster in class.
PBL & Identity: “Who Am I?” in the Classroom: Explores how students can use literature and creativity to examine identity—a perfect parallel to our Identity Showcase project.
Based on a combination of observations, surveys, and photographic/video accounts, I have found the following:
Students found their collaboration skills and engagement increased after participating in a creative, in-depth project opportunity (True Crime Unit - Investigative Teams).
It was also noted that overall student confidence increased as well, which was noted in places outside of the ELA classroom.
All of these combined made for a better, more comfortable classroom environment for all who learn in there.
As the year went on, I found that an important aspect of collaboration and engagement includes student voice. Many of the projects and ideas incorporated into class content started to include student input, giving suggestions and ideas. Much of the time I began having students lead the charge in some ways. This affected how I approached my data-focused unit (True Crime Unit), as I made sure that everyone had an idea of who was leading and *how* they could contribute to the work, not just work together. When it comes to collaboration, a lot of the time, students just might not know how to work together in a group and need guidance. Specific guidance and student voice are necessary for collaboration and engagement.
This is a link to the presentations my students made for their findings in their investigative teams projects. They presented this to the class as well as a guest detective from the Lexington Police Department.
Below is an article written by FCPS about the jury presentations my students did at the end of the unit.
This is the flyer for the Identity Showcase I put on during our first unit. I plan on implementing more storytelling elements when I teach this unit again next year.
This report analyzes student feedback collected at the beginning (Unit 1) and end (Unit 4) of the academic year in English 3. The focus is on identifying trends in student growth around collaboration, engagement, and creativity, especially in project-based units.
This year marked a pivotal shift in how I approach engagement and collaboration through project-based learning. From the Identity Showcase to the immersive True Crime Unit, students developed not just academic understanding but critical life skills—communication, teamwork, and problem-solving. Feedback and classroom observations reflected increased confidence and connection among students, underscoring the power of authentic, student-centered learning.
A key takeaway was the role of student voice in driving meaningful collaboration. When students contributed to project planning and had clearly defined roles, they were more invested and productive. Even reluctant learners found a place to contribute when given structure and ownership.
Looking ahead, I plan to build on this momentum by:
Deepening the Identity Unit through more creative storytelling formats.
Expanding the True Crime Unit via a partnership with the Lexington Police Department’s CSI team for real-world context.
Tapping into community resources like the Carnegie Center’s Author’s Academy to support continued growth for both myself and my students.
Refining collaboration systems to ensure all students have the tools and clarity to work effectively in groups.
With these steps, I aim to create a classroom where deeper learning is not just a goal, but a daily experience—where students feel seen, challenged, and inspired to connect their learning to the world around them.
The first time I heard about CTEPS was last year when a few of my colleagues at The Learning Center were participating in the TL4DL cohort. It sounded fascinating—especially as someone who considers herself a go-getter and loves getting into the nitty gritty of learning. At the time, I was starting my first year at TLC (and my third year teaching overall) while also preparing for my (somewhat impulsive) decision to pursue National Board Certification.
I heard about CTEPS again at the start of this school year, when our school formally adopted deeper learning as a campus-wide initiative. Much of what I had already been doing aligned with deeper learning, though I hadn’t previously assigned it that name. As a non-traditional educator—someone who came to teaching later in life—I’ve always leaned into creative problem-solving. That mindset carried into my teaching. I love designing ways to engage students meaningfully and involving them in the creative process.
While I was intrigued by CTEPS, I hesitated. I wanted to focus on finishing my final two NBCT components and was worried that adding another commitment would be too much. But after conversations with Tammi Franks and my assistant principal, Courtney Grimes, I decided to take the leap. I vividly remember Courtney asking me, “What do you need from me to make both of these things happen?” I replied, “I need to know someone believes in me.” She smiled and said, “I believe in you and I know you can do it.” That belief carried me through the year, even when things got tough.
Now in my fourth year of teaching, I’ve found a deeper sense of confidence and clarity in my classroom practice. I was ready to elevate my work—especially in how I approached assessment and engagement. I’m fortunate to have a great deal of autonomy in my role at TLC, which is both invigorating and intimidating. But with a year of experience under my belt, I felt ready to lean in.
This year also marked our school’s first year as a phone-free campus. We had been facing major issues with distraction, disengagement, and interpersonal conflict tied to student phone use. With the new policy in place, I saw an opportunity: to not only help students re-engage with content, but also to rebuild how they connect with each other. I knew it wouldn’t be easy, but it was a chance worth taking.
We began the year with an Identity Showcase. I wanted students to reflect deeply on who they were and express it publicly. We read various works on identity and explored multiple facets—cultural, historical, social—before students created poster boards to represent their journeys. I quickly realized that while removing phones helped, building collaboration still required intentional structures and meaningful catalysts.
That understanding informed the design of my True Crime unit, which became the highlight of my year. I spent hours crafting fictional case files and assigning team roles so that each student would have a clear purpose. The structure gave students a sense of ownership and made it easier to participate meaningfully. They spent weeks immersed in their investigations, analyzing evidence, debating theories, and preparing their jury presentations. Many students said it was the most fun they’d ever had in class—and I could see the growth in their confidence, communication, and critical thinking.
Of course, not everything went perfectly. I had reluctant students, students who struggled with teamwork, and even one pair who needed an alternate setup due to personal circumstances. I had to learn when to be flexible and when to set firmer expectations. Those moments taught me how to create space for everyone while still maintaining rigor.
One of my favorite memories was during our crime scene diorama project. Each student created a mini crime scene, then swapped with a classmate to investigate. I overheard one student say to another, “Now that’s some real detective thinking.” That moment stuck with me. It reminded me why I do this work: to create experiences that ignite curiosity, creativity, and pride.
As I write this, I can see students just outside my door collaborating on their end-of-unit projects for The Crucible. Despite some pushback throughout the year, I know I’ve built something meaningful—and I’m already thinking about how to grow it. Next year, I want to expand our Identity unit to include more storytelling and artistic mediums beyond poster boards. I also plan to scale up the True Crime unit by partnering with the Lexington Police Department’s crime scene investigation team to add a layer of real-world immersion. I'm also hoping to connect with the Carnegie Center through the Author’s Academy, which would give me access to additional resources and networks.
This has been my most challenging—and most rewarding—year as a young educator. I took risks. I created new systems. I asked a lot of myself and my students. And through it all, I rediscovered the importance of authenticity—both in and out of the classroom. Pursuing my own passions made me a better teacher, and sharing that journey with my students gave them permission to do the same.
I’m excited to keep pushing forward, deepening my practice, and building a classroom where learning is not just academic—but personal, collaborative, and alive.