8 Science and Engineering Practices
This project focuses on the 8 Science and Engineering (SEP) practices from the Next Generation Science Standards. My research interests focused on students' perceptions of STEM and whether or not it changed after understanding any of the 8 SEPs.
At the beginning of the year, I allowed student choice to determine the projects that developed in my classroom. The plethora of materials, and support became too much to manage in a classroom that juggled twenty five projects at one time. I found that the students didn't know what I expected and it was too open ended.
Half way through the year, I implemented controlled choice with more structure and clearer expectations. Students helped develop a set list of project options to choose from and whether they worked alone or with a partner. They also were given the choice to complete their work or enter their projects into a classroom competition. This went over so well that students were begging me to let them get out of another class to come work on their projects and stopping me in the hallway to ask if their paint is dry or if they can use a tool that day.
Here are the student crafted project options:
woodworking -- making a birdhouse
textile -- crocheting and sewing
robotics -- coding a story
3-D printing -- school spirit themed key chain contest
Digital Art -- book cover
Quantitative Data Analysis
Students took a pre-survey before learning about the eight Science and Engineering Practices (SEP's). In class, students learned about the 8 SEPs and identified how each skill showed up in our class, other classes and eventually, how it was utilized in their own projects. Through classroom discussions and individual reflections, students became familiar with the SEP’s. After two weeks of discussions, students took the survey again.
One of the largest differences in the pre and post data came from the question “In this class, I have used skills that scientists and engineers use”. Before the activity using the 8 SEP 20% of the students answered “very true/a lot of skills”. After the activity, 40% of the students answered ““very true/a lot of skills”.
Qualitative Data Analysis
I noticed very high engagement levels throughout this project. The students came in excited to work and eagerly shared their completed design journals with the class. One of the common themes I noticed from their prompts was that after learning about the skills engineers use, they realized that “engineering really isn’t that hard” and that engineers “use a lot of skills”.
One student noted that learning the skills engineers use “made me realize that i’ve been doing this all my life”. When I asked students which skill made them feel most like an engineer, there was a strong response for Developing and Using Models. A possible reason for this could be that all students had to make a sketch and then a prototype before constructing their project.
"The thing that made me feel most like an engineer would be doing research about birds and their houses. I also got to measure and drill which made me feel like an engineer."
"I thought at the beginning that engineers are boring and that I would not want to do anything like it, but after I can say now that it was pretty fun and that I would do something like this in the future again."
Overall I was pleased with the results of this project as an introductory exploratory research into STEM. In the future, I would like to collect data over a longer period of time and be able to incorporate the SEP throughout the entire unit.
Next year, I plan on continuing to offer opportunities for controlled student choice. I would like to find a way to measure the impact of student choice on their engagement in a more quantitative method.
I wanted to be a teacher because I had such a great middle school math and science teacher. Mr. Aguilar challenged me unlike any teacher I have ever had. He created lessons that were unique and engaging to meet my needs. When I started teaching 8th grade science fifteen years ago, I didn’t have a textbook online or physically in front of me. While I often felt overwhelmed with a lack of resources, I thrived off of learning how to develop my own teaching style with lots of freedom. I loved spending time being creative and finding ways to teach content. It was exhausting but fulfilling.
A few years later, new science standards were adopted in Kentucky- the Next Generation Science Standards. These new standards provided leadership opportunities for me outside of the classroom. Along with colleagues across the district, I developed rubrics to assess the 8 SEP, designed standard-aligned assessments, and created curriculum maps that deconstructing the new standards for teachers to use in our state. I loved that there was a greater emphasis on the skills our students need, not just the content. The 8 skills are known as the Science and Engineering Practices. This was the first time in my career that I heard of there being an emphasis on skills and not just knowledge on a test.
Soon after, the district adopted a new science curriculum. This curriculum came with a daily/weekly/monthly calendar and script. I had never taught with anything besides a pacing guide as a resource before. I was excited about the new curriculum as it was heavy in skills being used and developing scientific claims with supporting evidence and reasoning. However, after a few months of using the curriculum, the excitement wore off and it felt like I lost all of my personal teaching freedoms. I lost the creative spark to teach the way I thought was best for my students and me. Every school in the district was supposedly teaching the same content, the same way, with the same formative and summative assessments. Even though I had a supportive principal and was told that I didn’t have to follow the curriculum exactly, that I didn’t have to use the script, and that I could adapt our lessons to meet our needs and the students’, I still felt trapped. It felt like I couldn’t reach my potential.
Feeling trapped, I noticed that in my school, we had a few teachers propose to teach one section of an elective. I proposed that I could start teaching one section of a STEM elective where I could collaborate with other teachers and reinforce math and science standards through STEM activities to a group of sixth graders. Teaching this class brought back my spark, my creativity, and my joy. My assistant principal at the time noticed my efforts and enthusiasm and suggested that when the position opened, I could move full time to teaching STEM and Design. I took the opportunity the following school year and am currently in my second year in this role.
This transition has been overwhelming in the best possible way and has reminded me of why I became a teacher. I really enjoy getting the chance to design lessons that engage my students in areas of STEM while reinforcing content knowledge they learn in other classrooms.
The freedom I am given allows for me to teach in a way that suits me and my students. It makes me think about the boxes that students are placed in early on in our education system. I want to create a space where students have input into the decision making process, and can reflect on their skills as scientists and engineers.
This year, for my deeper learning project, I wanted to focus on student choice within the engineering design process. At first, I let my 7th graders pick anything they wanted as long as they used the design process to create their product. The plethora of materials, and support became too much to manage in a classroom that juggled twenty five projects at one time. I found that the students didn't know what I expected and it was too open ended.
Over this year, I’ve learned to take input from the students in the class and allow the students to come up with five projects they can choose from to design. Throughout the building and creating process, the students reflected on their use of the science and engineering practices to hopefully improve their self efficacy in STEM. Students learned about the 8 skills and identified ways they used them in this class and other classes. Students answered prompts about which skill made them feel most like an engineer.
Today I’m still trying to find a workable balance between student choice, expectations, and how to manage our time in the classroom. The second semester went much better than the first because I had high expectations, more structure, and a daily journal for the students to complete. As a class, we have been reflecting on the science and engineering practices we have used throughout project completion and skills we want to use in the future. Through this project I have noticed very high engagement from my students. I have students begging me to let them get out of another class to come work on their projects and stopping me in the hallway to ask if their paint is dry or if they can use a tool that day. The students' engagement and desire to be in my classroom has felt really fulfilling and rewarding and reinforces the value of letting teachers be unboxed.