Andrés Picó
Rafael I. Barraquer
Corneal surgery has been characterized, since the advent of microsurgery in the middle of the last century, by a high degree of precision. Because the cornea is the main optical element of the eye, it is critical that its surgical manipulation be precise, either when it has an explicitly refractive purpose, or in "therapeutic" indications due to the inevitable collateral refractive effect. The rise of lamellar keratoplasty, in its different anterior and posterior variants, has only increased the need for precision. Although the biomicroscope with slit lamp is still the basic work tool for the clinician, the contributions of technology in the field of diagnostic imaging have radically changed the way in which the indications, preparation and monitoring of keratoplasty are performed, and its incorporation into surgical equipment is already changing the way to practice them.
CORNEAL TOPOGRAPHY
By topography (from the Greek "topos", place, and "grafía", writing) we understand the study of the form and features of the surface – normally of the Earth. Applied to the cornea, it has become the complementary exploration that provides more information about its morphological characteristics – which in turn depends on refraction –, and even on neighboring structures such as the anterior chamber and the lens. Currently, corneal topography can be studied by any method capable of integrating information on the shape of the corneal surfaces, both anterior and posterior. We will review the main types.
Placido disc-based topography
The first technology capable of generating topographic maps of the cornea was based on the Placido disc. It uses the images of a series of concentric circles reflected on the surface of the cornea to measure the geometric values of the slope at different points of the cornea (Figure 1). With these measurements the values of axial and tangential curvature are calculated, but only of the anterior surface of the cornea and it is not possible to know the values of its elevation with respect to a reference plane. It would therefore be debatable whether we can properly speak of "topography". To denote the exclusive measurement of curvatures without considering the elevations, we proposed some time ago as the most appropriate term the one of «kurtography» (from the Greek «kurtós», curved)1.
Figure 1: Placido disc-based topographer. It allows to measure the curvatures of the anterior surface by the geometric analysis of the shape of the reflected rings.
Placido disc topography has been used for many years to determine the power of the cornea, by converting the values of radius of curvature (r, in mm), into diopters (D). This requires assuming a certain refractive index. Usually the formula D = (1.3375 - 1) * (1000) / r is used. With the advent of corneal refractive surgery, some shortcomings of this technology became apparent. Since it infers the total power of the cornea from the values of only the anterior surface – using the keratometric index – the results are only approximate, often without the sufficient precision required by the current refractive surgery and the calculations for intraocular lenses (IOL). It remains useful, however, to determine the amount and type of astigmatism, both preoperatively and, above all, in the postoperative controls after keratoplasty, since this remains one of the main problems after this surgery.
Scanning topography with slit
The appearance of the Orbscan system at the end of the last century revolutionized the study of the cornea and quickly became essential in corneal refractive surgery and in the early diagnosis of keratoconus2. Its method of horizontal scanning by slits allows obtaining elevation maps3 that compare the anterior and posterior aspherical surfaces of the cornea with a reference sphere4 (Figure 2). This type of maps, genuinely topographic, provide us with a more real image of the corneal morphology. By knowing the heights of the anterior and posterior surfaces, the system deduces the thickness for each point and generates a pachymetric map. The Orbscan can obtain curvature/power measurements from elevation data, but still incorporates a Placido disc to measure keratometric data – which in fact continue to be more reliable for the anterior surface5.
Figure 2: Orbscan II. In the classic "Quad Map" display, the maps of the anterior and posterior elevation, the pachymetric and the keratometric maps are presented (from top left, in a clockwise sense), here in a case of incipient keratoconus.
Topography by Scheimpflug tomography
The Scheimpflug principle – an Austrian military engineer who developed it at the beginning of the 20th century – is a geometric rule that relates the orientations of the focal plane, the lens and the image in an optical system such as a camera. It was applied mostly to correct aerial photography images. By tilting the lens, it allows keeping in focus the objects that are not parallel to the plane of the film or sensor, such as the structures of the eye in the sagittal plane of the slit, with respect to a camera that is placed in the frontal position (Figure 3). Instruments that apply this principle to a monochromatic slit light, such as Pentacam (Oculus), Galilei (Ziemer) or Sirius (CSO), allow to obtain tomographic images of the cornea, anterior chamber and even the lens. By rotating the camera and integrating multiple tomographic images (two-dimensional cuts), they produce topographic maps of surfaces or three-dimensional models6.
Figure 3: Scheimpflug principle. When the lens of the camera (red line) is at a certain intermediate angle, everything in the plane of interest (blue) is focused in the plane of the film (green).
While some of these devices continue to incorporate an additional Placido disc, the Pentacam HR represents a "pure" Scheimpflug system. It captures 50 meridional images in 2 seconds (rotating 180°) and evaluates 500 points in each of them (Figures 4 and 5), which supposes a total of 25,000 elevation data (Figure 6). A second camera detects and corrects the possible movements of the eye during capture. This makes these platforms more accurate than Orbscan7.
Figure 4: Pentacam HR (Oculus). Scheimpflug slit image series. With the camera that rotates 180°, serial sections are obtained in all the meridians, which can be selected for detailed analysis.
Figure 5: Pentacam HR (Oculus). Detail of a Scheimpflug image of a keratoconus showing the localized thinning in the ectatic zone.
Figure 6: Pentacam HR (Oculus). Preliminary image where you can select each of the sections made by the Scheimpflug camera, the different keratometric and topographic elevation maps, as well as a virtual three-dimensional composition of both corneal surfaces and of the anterior chamber.
The anterior and posterior keratometric maps – be they refractive or of axial or tangential curvatures – and pachymetric are obtained from the measurements of elevation from limbus to limbus (Figure 7). They also allow measuring the depth and volume of the anterior chamber, the value of the angle in its 360° and the pupillary diameter, and perform optical densitometry of the cornea and the lens. All these data open new possibilities in the planning and monitoring of the different current modalities of corneal transplantation.
Figure 7: Pentacam HR (Oculus). Presentation of four simultaneous maps. On the left, the parameters of the anterior cornea, posterior cornea, pachymetry and depth and volume of the anterior chamber are presented. On the right (clockwise from top left): keratometric, anterior or "frontal" elevation, posterior elevation and pachymetric maps. Although based on series of integrated tomographies, the maps are strictly topographic.
Optical coherence tomography
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is an imaging technique that allows two-dimensional slices of translucent tissue to be obtained, with a resolution that resembles a non-invasive, live histology. Although its most widespread use in ophthalmology has been the study of the macula, it is increasingly used as a diagnostic tool in glaucoma and exploration of the cornea and the anterior chamber.
OCT is based on the principle of low coherence interferometry. A beam of laser light is emitted towards the structure under study and the delay of the reflection from it is compared in an interferometer with a reference beam (Figure 8).
Figure 8: Principle of operation of the OCT. The light coming from the source impinges on the beam splitting mirror, the transmitted beam reaches the eye and the reflected one goes towards a reference mirror. The detector analyzes the interference between the light reflected in the eye structures and in the reference mirror.
In the first version of this technology, called «temporal domain», a moving reference mirror is used to measure the time it takes for light to reflect. This mechanical process is relatively slow and limits both the number of scans and the image quality. In a temporal domain OCT, about 400 axial scans (A-scan) per second are performed, which are integrated to create the two-dimensional image. More recently, the "spectral domain" or Fourier OCT technology uses only mathematical calculations, which avoids the mechanical process and makes it 100 times faster (40,000 A-scan/s). In addition, the spectral OCT simultaneously measures multiple wavelengths of the spectrum of the reflected light. More explorations result in a higher resolution and quality of the two-dimensional image, but also of surface maps (topographic, keratometric) and three-dimensional models (e.g., pachymetric) by integration of a large number of tomographic slices. The acquisition of images is combined with an eye tracking technology to compensate for possible movements during capture, as well as a simultaneous double image scan. This minimizes noise and allows the instrument to accurately track small changes over time.
In comparison with ultrasonic biomicroscopy (UBM), OCT is a non-contact method that does not require the patient's supine position and allows images to be obtained at a higher speed and resolution. Its disadvantage with respect to the UBM is the limitation by opaque structures to the light that the ultrasounds can cross – e.g., to visualize the ciliary body –. However, the near-infrared light that OCT usually uses has a capacity to penetrate semitransparent tissues – such as a leucomatous cornea – far superior to visible light.
The accuracy of the OCT has been imposed in applications such as measuring the depth of the anterior chamber to plan a surgery with phakic lens implant (Figure 9) and to measure its distance to the crystalline lens once implanted.
Figure 9: The anterior segment OCT allows very accurate measurements of corneal thickness and depth of the anterior chamber as well as the characteristics of the angle.
It also allows the study of the angle, with a resolution comparable or superior to the UBM. Apart from its interest in patients with glaucoma, this ability is very useful for the diagnosis, indication and planning of corneal transplant surgeries (Figure 10) – especially in complex cases where visibility is limited –8. It allows defining the depth of the graft according to the location of the corneal lesions and assessing the corneal thickness – in cases of edema, etc. – with a robustness that makes it remain effective in cases with a lot of opacity and irregularity, where visible light-based systems as the Scheimpflug tomography present many artifacts.
Figure 10: Spectral OCT (Casia SS-1000). Different sections of a cornea with marked ectasia.
In the postoperative period after a transplant, the OCT allows us to assess the regularity of the cut, the thickness of the graft9 (Figures 11 and 12) or that of a residual lamellar bed; the correct apposition of endothelial grafts10 or of the recipient endothelium to a deep anterior lamellar graft, as well as the assessment of the structures of the anterior chamber, angle, iris, lens, intraocular lens11, etc.
Figure 11: Spectral OCT (Casia SS-1000). The anterior segment OCT also allows for curvature and pachymetry maps through the integration of multiple tomographies. In the figure we can see a postoperative case of endothelial lamellar keratoplasty (DSAEK).
Figure 12: Pavlin CJ, Foster FS. Ultrasound biomicroscopy of the eye. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 1995.
Ultrasonic biomicroscopy
Ultrasonic biomicroscopy (UBM) is a high-resolution ultrasound technique that allows detailed visualization of anterior segment structures, including opaque ones12. It is a more laborious study since it requires an immersion technique, but it allows to visualize the places where explorations based on light cannot access, such as the ciliary body. It is essential to determine if a tumor mass is solid or cystic (Figure 13) or when there are very dense corneal opacities that prevent the passage of OCT or create artifacts by shadows.
Figure 13: Pavlin CJ, Harasiewicz K, Sherar MD, Foster FS. Clinical use of ultrasound biomicroscopy. Ophthalmology. 1991; 98: 287-295.
The ultrasonic waves are emitted by a transducer and propagated longitudinally through the ocular media, the echoes reflected by the different structures are picked up by the transducer13, transformed into electrical signals, and presented on the monitor as two-dimensional images of high resolution and dynamic – although measurements can be made on a given table –14. The frequency of emission, normally between 30 and 50 MHz for the anterior segment, depends on the type of probe used: the higher the frequency, the higher the resolution but the lower the penetration.
In cases of corneal opacification, the information provided by the UBM is very useful to plan the intervention and control the results15. The most commonly used applications include the study of the angle and discard anterior synechiae that could interfere with surgery or be the cause of postoperative ocular hypertension. With the UBM it has been possible to demonstrate the appearance of a cyclodialysis as a cause of hypotonia after endothelial keratoplasty (see chapter 6.9.5). The detection of problems in the lens such as cataract (Figure 14), subluxation or the presence of vitreous in the anterior chamber is also possible in the presence of corneal opacity.
Figure 14: García Feijoó, et al. Biomicroscopía ultrasónica (BMU) en segmento anterior. Métodos diagnósticos en segmento anterior. Ponencia SECOIR 2011. 469-482.
Confocal microscopy
Confocal microscopy is an imaging technique using laser scanning that increases the resolution and contrast of the micrography thanks to a pinhole that is placed in the confocal plane of the lens and eliminates out-of-focus light16. It generates tomographic slices that represent a true histology "in vivo" in the frontal plane and can be made serial to study a volume plane by plane – e.g., the different layers of the cornea –17 (Figures 15, 16 and 17).
Figure 15: Pazos B, Sánchez Salorio M, Suárez A, Rodríguez-Ares MT. Biomicroscopía ultrasónica en la planificación de la queratoplastia. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol 1997; 72: 841- 848.
Figure 16: Szaflik JP. Comparison of in vivo confocal microscopy of human cornea by white light scanning slit and laser scanning systems. Cornea. 2007; 26: 438-445.
Figure 17: Centellas-Vargas WR, Velasco R, Baca O, Babayan A. Microscopía corneal en distrofias corneales. Rev Mex Oftalmol 2009; 83: 26-34.
Confocal microscopy allows the detailed study of the epithelium, the stroma and its cicatricial processes, the endothelium and the corneal innervation. We can determine with great precision the corneal thickness and that of each of its layers. It also allows to follow the evolution of the histological changes that occur in the pathological cornea.
In recent years confocal microscopy has proved to be an especially useful tool for the diagnosis of certain corneal infections, such as those caused by Acanthamoeba or by fungi, where it allows non-invasive visualization of cysts or hyphae. Some corneal dystrophies can be diagnosed early with this technique, apart from its usefulness for monitoring them18, or that of the scarring phenomena (haze) after laser ablation19. In keratoplasties, the endothelium can be studied even in the presence of opacities or edema that would prevent obtaining specular microscopy images. In the postoperative follow-up it is useful to evaluate the healing process – e.g. in a lamellar interphase – and differentiate the causes of graft edema20.
Specular microscopy
Specular microscopy is a non-invasive test that allows the qualitative and quantitative study of corneal endothelial cells. It takes advantage of the intense reflection caused by the endothelium-aqueous humor interphase when it is illuminated with a certain angle, to generate an image that will be captured by an optical system. This magnified image is generally subjected to analysis programs that allow quantifying the morphological parameters of the endothelium. If the distribution of the endothelial cells is assumed to be almost uniform, from a sample of a certain area we can know the endothelial cell density and the morphological characteristics of the cells through the percentage of hexagonality and the coefficient of variation of the cell area21 (Figure 18).
Figure 18: González J, Casanueva H, Alberro M, Rojas E. Microscopía Confocal en las Distrofias Corneales. Arch Oftal B. Aires. 2011; 82: 33-39.
With specular microscopy it is possible to detect and monitor endothelial primary22 (Figure 19) or acquired diseases or the evaluation of possible alterations secondary to surgical procedures. To obtain clear images, the cornea must have sufficient transparency. This can be improved, in the presence of edema, momentarily by hyperosmolar agents such as glycerin.
Figure 19: Specular microscopy. Cornea guttata. The excrescences in the Descemet membrane vary the angle of incidence of the light on the endothelial surface. Dark spots appear due to the interruption of the specular reflection.
In corneal transplants that include endothelium, specular microscopy is essential both for the selection and viability of the donor tissue and for the indication, evaluation and long-term follow-up of the recipient, 23 and allows therapeutic decisions to be made in the face of circumstances such as accelerated cell loss. without apparent cause24.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. Barraquer RI, Barraquer J. Corneal dystrophies and keratoconus. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 1994; 5: 53-67.
2. Cairns G, McGhee CNJ. Orbscan computerized topography: Attributes, applications, and limitations. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005; 31: 205-220.
3. Tanabe T, Oshika T, Tomidokoro A, et al. Standardized color-coded scales for anterior and posterior elevation maps of scanning slit corneal topography. Ophthalmology. 2002; 109: 1298-302.
4. Garzón N, Poyales F. ORBSCAN: Mapas topográficos. Gaceta Óptica. 2007; 420: 24-28.
5. Liu Z, Huang AJ, Pflugfelder SC. Evaluation of corneal thickness and topography in normal eyes using the Orbscan corneal topography system. Br J Ophthalmol. 1999; 83: 774-778.
6. Wegener A, Laser-Junga H. Photography of the anterior eye segment according to Scheimpflug’s principle: options and limitations-a review. Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology. 2009. 37: 144-154.
7. Ha BJ, Kim SW, Kim SW, Kim EK, Kim TI. Pentacam and Orbscan II measurements of posterior corneal elevation before and after photorefractive keratectomy. J Refract Surg. 2009; 25: 290-5.
8. Villarrubia A. Aplicaciones de la OCT-SA en el trasplante de córnea. Muñoz F, Rebolleda G, Diaz M. Tomografía de coherencia óptica. LXXXVII Ponencia Sociedad Española de Oftalmología. 2011.
9. Hirano K, Ito Y, Suzuki T, Kojima T, Kachi S, Miyake Y. Optical coherence tomography for the noninvasive evaluation of the cornea. Cornea. 2001; 20: 281-289.
10. Nieuwendaal CP, Mirjam EJ, van Velthoven et al. Thickness measurements of donor posterior disks after Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty with anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Cornea. 2009; 28: 298-303.
11. Doors M, Berendschot TT, de Brabander J, Webers CAB, Nuijts RM. Value of optical coherence tomography for anterior segment surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010; 36: 1213-1229.
12. Pavlin CJ, Foster FS. Ultrasound biomicroscopy of the eye. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 1995.
13. Pavlin CJ, Harasiewicz K, Sherar MD, Foster FS. Clinical use of ultrasound biomicroscopy. Ophthalmology. 1991; 98: 287-295.
14. García Feijoó, et al. Biomicroscopía ultrasónica (BMU) en segmento anterior. Métodos diagnósticos en segmento anterior. Ponencia SECOIR 2011. 469-482.
15. Pazos B, Sánchez Salorio M, Suárez A, Rodríguez-Ares MT. Biomicroscopía ultrasónica en la planificación de la queratoplastia. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol 1997; 72: 841- 848.
16. Szaflik JP. Comparison of in vivo confocal microscopy of human cornea by white light scanning slit and laser scanning systems. Cornea. 2007; 26: 438-445.
17. Centellas-Vargas WR, Velasco R, Baca O, Babayan A. Microscopía corneal en distrofias corneales. Rev Mex Oftalmol 2009; 83: 26-34.
18. González J, Casanueva H, Alberro M, Rojas E. Microscopía Confocal en las Distrofias Corneales. Arch Oftal B. Aires. 2011; 82: 33-39.
19. Javaloy J, Vidal, MT, Ruiz JM, Alió JL. Microscopía confocal de la córnea en la cirugía fotorrefractiva. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2005; 80.
20. Kitzman A, Winter E, Nau CB, McLaren JW. Comparison of corneal endothelial cell images from a non-contact specular microscope and a scanning confocal microscope. Cornea. 2005; l 24: 980-984.
21. Yee RW, Matsuda M, Schultz RO, Edelhauser HF. Changes in the normal corneal endothelial cellular pattern as a function of age. Curr Eye Res. 1985; 4: 671-678.
22. Wilson SE, Bourne WM, O’Brien PC. Endothelial function and aqueous flow rate in patients with Fuchs dystrophy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1988; 106: 270-278.
23. Bourne WM. Morphologic and functional evaluation of the endothelium of transplanted human corneas. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1983; 81: 403-450.
24. Obata H, Ishida K, Murao M, et al. Corneal endothelial cell damage in penetrating keratoplasty. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 1991; 35: 411-416.