Time lapse of bronze dogbone printing.
Sample testing performance of different thicknesses.
Sample testing performance of different thicknesses.
Bronze disk sample
Bronze fatigue sample
Early steel cube sample
Later steel cube sample
Steel gear sample
Early bronze cube, lump from lack of compression
Early bronze cube
Later bronze cube
Later bronze dogbone
Starting from left: Standard PLA benchy, uncompressed bronze benchy, bronze benchy compressed with mechanism, uncompressed stainless steel 316L benchy, stainless steel 316L benchy compressed with mechanism. Compressed benchies show improved geometric retention and reduced shrinkage compared to uncompressed.
Images of our compression mechanism prototype and actual mechanism.
Prototype made from laser cut acrylic
Actual mechanism made entirely from machineable alumina
Images of CAD models of our 4 proposed compression mechanism designs.
Design 1: Alumina Bolt
Design 2: Tungsten Flexures
Design 3: Tungsten Barbells
Design 4: Single Bolt Mechanism
We used bricks to apply pressure to our parts to validate the necessity of our compression mechanism.
Brick is placed on kiln paper fitting in crucible to apply compression to refractory powder in crucible.
Side view of compressed dogbone (top) vs. uncompressed dogbone (bottom). Warping/bowing apparent on uncompressed dogbone
Debinded dogbone ran without compression. Can see pillowing and deformation in grip section.
Debinded dogbone ran with compression. No geometric deformeties apparent.
If we could use non-machineable alumina for our compression mechanism, it would greatly reduce the cost. Image on the left shows our failed attempt at laser cutting alumina. This was the depth achieved after an 1hr and a half. Alumina slab is about 5 mm thick.
Images from our testing to determine the ideal range of compression to be exerted by our compression mechanism. We tried to find how much force it took to get diminishing amounts of change in powder height. This was found to be around 5 psi.
Uncompressed powder
Measuring Uncompressed Height
Pressing Powder to Compress and Measuring Applied Pressure
Measuring Compressed Height
Images from our testing of oxidation of Tungsten to test its viability for use as a material in our compression mechanism. We ran one tungsten rod through a bronze debind cycle and one through a bronze sinter cycle.
Post debind (left) specimen is visibly darker than pretest specimen (right) indicating oxidation.
Specimen after being run through sintering ramped cycle only. 2.6% mass difference before and after run due to oxidation. Oxidation is vey visible in this image.
Inside of tube furnace with sintering specimen placed inside an alumina crucible at 250 C.
Inside of tube furnace with sintering specimen at 885 C.
A MATLAB image processing script was written to take in images from a microscope of our samples and isolate the voids. Isolated voids were then used to get an estimate of porosity.
RGB image of Bronze sample under a microscope
Black and white image of sample. White sections are voids.
Voids isolated using a MATLAB image processing script. Color of voids correlates to their size (Rainbow color scale). Red = large, Blue = small.
Spread of void size obtained from isolated voids using image above.
Elemental composition of a steel sample obtained from a scanning electron microscope.
Cube samples were used to characterize shrinkage, density, and hardness. Disks were used for characterizing the microstructure. ASTM dogbones were used for tensile strength.
Steel Cube sample (green on top and post-sintered on bottom)
Bronze Disk Sample
(green on top and post-sintered on bottom)
Bronze Dogbone Sample
(green on top and post-sintered on bottom)
Images and videos from our characterization of our samples
Tensile Testing of a Bronze Dogbone
Hardness test on Bronze specimen
We measured the displacement of water before and after our specimens were place in it to get its volume (Archimedes Method). Then we divided its weight by the displaced volume to get its density.
Bronze Cube Specimen
Taking the weight
Volume of the water before displacement
Volume after displacement
We measured our parts after each step green, brown, sintered, and post sintered. These measurements we used to keep track of how much parts shrink with each step.
"Green" benchy (left) vs. Post Sintered Benchy (right) showing amount of shrinkage after debinding and sintering.
We built a printer enclosure to prevent warping of parts from exposure to cooler air while printing. It was built from 3D printed PLA parts, laser cut acrylic, and wood.
Starting from the left: bronze benchy ran without compression, bronze benchy ran with compression mechanism, Stainless steel 316L benchy ran without compression, and Stainless steel 316L ran with compression mechanism.
FDM printer we used for our metal prints
Process overview made with powerpoint
Printing parameters made with powerpoint
Debinding and Sintering parameters made with powerpoint
Material characterization made with powerpoint
Material characterization results made with powerpoint