"You Don't Need a Budget to Riot"
Tris Arthur (Emerson College '23)
Filmmaking has always been an expensive art, and documentary filmmaking is no exception. Budgets for films centering popular musicians have ballooned into eight-figure numbers, creating a large commercial industry out of biographical music documentaries. So where does that leave the smaller players? For as long as music documentaries have been around, independent filmmakers have found a way to carve a space in that niche for what, from a major producer’s perspective, might as well amount to nothing. The question, then, is why make these smaller films? At the end of the day, independent music documentaries will make far less income than their multi-million-dollar counterparts, maybe even costing the filmmaker more money than they make back from it, so why go through the trouble of making a music documentary for non-commercial purposes? The answer can be many things—art, appreciation, recognition—but Sini Anderson’s The Punk Singer (2013) takes a less common approach for music documentaries: social-impact filmmaking.
The Neda Nobari Foundation defines social-impact filmmaking as “independent documentary filmmaking that seeks to tell deep human stories that inspire a revolution of the heart.” While this idea of social-impact filmmaking might usually be applied to films with a more overtly-political or social subject (Agnès Varda’s Black Panthers (1968) comes to mind), I believe there is a case to be made that The Punk Singer serves as the biographical music documentary version of this type of filmmaking, which is reflective in the film’s subject matter, its subjective perspective, and its low-budget, no-frills aesthetics.
The Punk Singer is, at its core, a documentary about Kathleen Hanna: a feminist punk rock musician famous for Bikini Kill, Le Tigre, and, importantly, the Riot Grrrl movement. Through Riot Grrrl and her music career, Hanna has spent a large part of her life fighting for women across all races, ages and sexualities against the violence committed against them, thus cementing herself as not just a musician but as a feminist symbol. She has used her music and artistic expression to forward her cause, so while The Punk Singer may serve as a musician’s biography, it is also concurrently an activist’s biography.
In telling Hanna’s story, The Punk Singer makes little effort to hide that at the end of the day, this film was made for very little money and is not a commercial venture. While the film has a somewhat disappointing tendency to stick to traditionally commercial modes of documentary filmmaking with abundant talking heads intermixed with plainly-presented archival materials, the execution of each of these tropes calls attention to the fact that this is an independent production making no great effort to pretend to be otherwise. For instance, see the following screenshot of recurring interviewee Lynnee Breedlove:
To be perfectly frank, this shot makes very little stylistic sense. It does little to incorporate Hanna’s punk aesthetics, it is awkwardly framed, is shot outdoors with seemingly no artificial lights, and is in a setting that feels random and out-of-place with the rest of the documentary. If every interview in the film had a similar aesthetic, maybe this could all make sense, but there is very little consistency with how the interviews are shot. Some look lit, others don’t. Some are in a person’s home, one is in a back garden, one is filmed awkwardly-tight against the siding of a house, and a few are in the back of a car decorated with plaid blankets and Christmas lights filmed from a canted angle (see above image carousel). Many of them are aesthetically displeasing. Some of them look comparatively nice and thought-out. The throughline, however, is mostly that the interviews look like they were made for a paper-thin budget on-the-fly with the primary attention being given to the actual words being said by the actual people saying them. At the end of the day, is this a poor attempt at conventional filmmaking, or is this the prioritizing of something more important than aesthetics?
To answer this question, I believe that it is important to understand more about documentary and perspective. In a paper titled “The nexus of political documentary and alternative journalism,” written by Norman Zafra and published in Pacific Journalism Review, the author writes about the generally accepted difference between journalism and documentary by stating: “[the] objective stance differentiates journalism from documentary’s political and radical perspective… documentary makers are frequently criticised for ‘transgressing norms of perceived objectivity’ often expected of conventional mainstream journalism.” While I certainly believe that documentaries can themselves be made with a journalistic eye for objectivity, it is true that the filmmaker behind the camera will almost certainly let their perspective of and feelings for the subject they are making a film about seep into the film itself. Some hide this, some embrace it. The Punk Singer is the latter.
The film channels its subjective perspective of Kathleen Hanna by painting a loving, sympathetic, celebratory portrait of the musician while continuing to forward her causes and support her current work and platform her messages in support of people, like herself, with Lyme Disease. Thus, the film has all the makings of a heavily-biased, subjective documentary made with a genuine affection for its subject. Anderson says as much on the film’s official website, which highlights her friendship with Hanna that started long before the film was made. So, why does the film look so bad? Because it isn’t how it looks that matters, it’s the message it is intent on getting out into the world, inspiring “a revolution of the heart.”
Anderson’s documentary is a filmic declaration that you don’t need money to make your voice heard and create positive change. It is an explicit piece of anti-capitalist, anti-hate filmmaking both through the subjects it represents and the method of production, making decisions that might not be stylistically compelling, but which nonetheless forwards loud female voices and sick voices in an industry that has not always been welcoming to them. It is a film that decides to spend a minute of its time on a quiet shot of Hanna lying on a couch (see top of column) because it’s more important to the revolution the film is inspiring to include a frank, unfiltered depiction of life with Lyme Disease than to include a flashy expensive punk rock music montage. This is filmmaking with values.
The Punk Singer thus represents the special and rare intersection between music documentary and social-change filmmaking. Rather than creating a biographical music documentary for commercial or even artistic purposes, Sini Anderson was driven by the chance to spread her ideals through the inspiring music and story of Kathleen Hanna. Nothing about the film is about financial success or artistic worth or filmic merit—it’s about the opportunity for documentary to accomplish something on a social-political level. This is the spirit of Kathleen Hanna shining through. The music doesn’t need to be good if it’s saying something and making you feel something. I believe The Punk Singer holds a similar philosophy, scrapping together its amateurish interviews and shoddy archival editing into a documentary that knows you don’t need an eight-figure budget to call for a riot.
"Girls To The Front: How The Punk Singer Creates a Safe Space for Women"
Bre Trainor (Emerson College '23)
Ever Since I was a child I have always had a strong liking for punk music. I grew up listening to various punk and grunge artists from the late 80s and early 90s thanks to my older siblings. Once I became old enough to go to concerts I noticed extremely quickly that many punk spaces are an incredibly male dominated crowd. This confused me at the time because most of my friends who also shared an interest in punk music were female identifying. I soon realized that the majority of punk catered towards men, and because of this, it was generally not a safe place for women. While watching The Punk Singer I was immediately taken back to my early concert days when my consciousness of being perceived as a woman in these settings was at its peak. This film directly addresses the female experience within the punk scene, something of which I had never seen. The Punk Singer demonstrates how the punk scene can be a female inclusive and empowering space, by exemplifying the importance and value of women in punk.
One of the biggest takeaways from The Punk Singer for me was the emphasis of the motto “All girls to the front.” More specifically, how Kathleen Hanna wanted to create an environment within punk that recognized and uplifted women. In the punk scene it was not generally safe to be a woman. In the article titled “REFORMULATING THE RIOT GRRRL MOVEMENT: SPACE AND SISTERHOOD IN KATHLEEN HANNA’S LYRICS” The author Alconada states,
“During the 1980s gender differences and sexism within Washington D.C. all-male punk community became more and more obvious: ‘A prescriptive hardcore sound evolved in DC which emphasized instru- mental virtuosity and speed which, unlike independent punk culture in Olympia, troubled the meanings and values of punk and DIY and produced more gendered experiences of the punk scene’. Thus, girls who enjoyed alternative punk music and attended punk concerts were commonly pushed to the sides as coat stands, got insulted, and asked to move out of the scene.”
This documentary touches on how women were treated before female artists like Bikini Kill and the “riot grrrl” movement with personal stories from associates of Hanna and Hanna herself, stating how women were being disrespected, ignored, and abused. A specific example that stood out to me in the first half of The Punk Singer, where Hanna herself tells a story about an incident with her roomate, who was followed and almost killed by a man in her own apartment. In the documentary Kathleen Hanna speaks how this incident flipped a switch in her brain that caused her to focus on making sure her friends and other women were safe. A place where men did not control the room and had no power to induce harm. I thought this documentary did an excellent job on showcasing throughout the film the violence towards women in the punk scene. More specifically, the violence by men focused towards Kathleen Hanna herself on and off stage. Throughout the film she discussed vile comments that men were making in person or through mail, and actual attempted violence at shows towards the women present at the venue. Moments like those were important to exemplify the weight of Kathleen Hanna’s fight for female empowerment.
Much of her advocacy for women was contained in her lyrics themselves. By being an activist for women on stage, by demanding respect for all women, especially a right for women to have a place within punk. While discussing Bikini Kill’s lyrical content Alconada states, “That feeling of bonding and sisterhood that these girls created was in need of a space where to freely and safely express their feminine conditions. In the lyrics of Bikini Kill and Le Tigre we come across examples in which Hanna openly asks for feminist spaces within the underground sphere in which her bands were positioned.” This film did a great job at encapsulating Hanna’s fight in her lyrical content for female inclusion. One thing I found interesting is how they segwayed from Bikini Kill and shifted focus on Julie Ruin and Le Tigre. Part of me wishes The Punk Singer focused a little more on Le Tigre and Julie Ruin, the way they did for Bikini Kill, but it was a little rushed comparatively.
The documentary showcased how Kathlen Hanna would tell all the women in the audience at her show to come to the front of the crowd, to push past the men. This displayed Kathleen Hanna's fight for sisterhood within punk. This documentary did a clear job of emphasizing the importance within Kathleen Hanna's belief that women need to be heard and respected with a display of a mix of talking heads and archival footage. This belief translated to some of the specific choices during the production and post production for The Punk Singer. More specifically, the choice of who spoke for their talking heads segments.
This documentary contained almost all talking heads from women in the industry, friends, and family of Kathleen Hanna. This choice I believe was deliberate and created a place where women are important. There was no sense of a need from validation of a high status male talking head. Kathleen Hanna stated herself in an interview with SXSW in 2013 she states, "I want women to be the experts. I don’t want these male experts to come in to make it legitimate.” When watching The Punk Singer this was the first thing to really stick out to me. One talking head I thought worked especially well was the choice to include Carrie Brownstein. She speaks on how Hanna was like during her shows and how empowering it was for her. Including her stuck out to me because Brownstein herself is a part of a band Sleater-Kinny, which originated from Kathleen Hanna's movement in the early 90s. This choice to not include male experts to make women's statements legitimate, is something that I had ever seen within a documentary, and refreshing to see.
On the other hand one note of criticism I would say regarding this is that there are few moments where Hanna contradicts her beliefs. I think the moments with Adam Horowitz, the frontman of the Beastie Boys, who is also her husband, tend to lean towards a bias on Kathleen Hanna's part. She even states in the movie that she is aware of the irony that a feminist punk singer like herself married someone who made songs objectifying women. This is not brought up ever again in the film, but nonetheless I think it is important to address.
The Punk Singer, while sometimes lacking visual intrigue at times, had an informal and refreshing narrative within the world of music documentaries. Even though it was unoriginal with some of the visual choices and aesthetics of the film, the nuance of only having women as the experts within the context of the film is truly inspirational.
"Thinking About Feminist Avant-Garde Aesthetics"
Anais Abrego (Emerson College '24)
I was first introduced to Kathleen Hanna when I was 15 or 16, frustrated by the inappropriate gaze that falls on teenage girls as sexual objects. I wanted nothing more than to still be perceived as a child in public settings and my outward appearance did nothing to deflect this difficult, confusing, often demoralizing, transition from childhood to womanhood. Kathleen Hanna’s lyrics offered a dynamic approach to the feelings I could not yet articulate about loss of innocence, sexual violence against women, and rejection of traditional femininity.
These themes, specifically sexual violence against women, are something that Hanna has explored since beginning her career as an artist with spoken word poetry and zine writing. The Punk Singer opens with a recording of a spoken word performance by Hanna from 1991. Attention-grabbing and visceral in detail, Hanna exclaims: “I am your worst nightmare come to life… I am going to tell everyone what you did to me… it was the middle of the night in my house.” Disarming the audience, Director Sini Anderson’s choice to begin here reflects the essence of Kathleen Hanna’s intertwinement of social justice and experimental art. Following this scene, Hanna narrates her experience meeting the late Kathy Acker, an influential figure in feminist avant-garde literature, mentioning that Acker convinced her to leave spoken word behind and start a band.
Acker’s work, particularly Blood and Guts in High School (published 1984), inspired Kathleen Hanna’s early zines including The Most Beautiful Girl is a Dead Girl (1992). Both texts utilize feminist avant-garde aesthetics that offer a complicated alternative picture of violence and consent. According to feminist theory scholar Anna Ioanes, This style is emphasized by an aesthetic that explores transgression and taboo via strategies such as nonlinear narrative, collage, and drawing in order to invite critical thinking about what feelings violence can provoke.
On a surface level, I found The Punk Singer to be lacking in the aesthetic qualities that defined Hanna’s art and career. The film adheres to the ‘rules’ of a traditional biographical documentary film that works its way through the life of its subject in linear order decorated with archival photographs, footage, and talking head interviews. In an interview with Denver’s Westword magazine, director Sini Anderson mentions that she received access to Hanna’s personal archive of the Riot Grrrl collection at the Fales Library at NYU, yet this resource feels incredibly underutilized. Hanna’s zine work is briefly presented in photographs and a lone stopmotion animation sequence that only left me waiting for more mixed-media usage. On the subject of Riot Grrrl, Hanna mentions that her and her co-creators decided against branding and copyrighting the term in the film, mentioning that it “belonged to everybody” and was meant to inspire women across the country to create their own interpretations. However, the audience is given seconds to ingest the zines’ content in between brief zooms and close-ups. Glossing over an opportunity to showcase the content of a private collection locked behind NYU credentials felt incredibly antithetical to the populist approach Hanna discusses.Why not take a moment to linger and allow for a contemporary audience to digest and recontexualize the Riot Grrrl movement?
The Punk Singer thrives when Sini Anderson finally allows for a lingering moment in the final section of the film which discusses Hanna’s difficult diagnosis with late stage lyme disease. A common practice in avant-garde cinema, extended, uninterrupted shots provide a platform to disrupt the conventional narrative structures that often marginalize female perspectives, allowing for a more immersive and holistic portrayal. Juxtaposing the fast-paced editing of the rest of the film, Hanna’s struggle with lyme disease is presented in extended takes, mirroring the duration of real life experience and breaking from a stylized biographical form. It is in these painful and uncomfortable moments sitting with Hanna on her couch or receiving an IV treatment that I truly felt a sense of how she has bore much of her personal life and energy into art and social justice. The Punk Singer makes sure that Hanna and Bikini Kill's many disagreements with mainstream music press at the height of their popularity are no secret, and I appreciate how Sini Anderson resisted in fragmenting female experience and allowed Kathleen Hanna to reclaim her own story.
The idea that the personal experience is important and necessary is a defining element of feminist avant-garde aesthetics which aim to recontexualize the every day. To experimental filmmakers such as Lynne Sachs, our personal lives are saturated with socio-political meaning that can be extracted to link private moments to major national or global events. In Sachs’ The House of Science: a museum of false facts (1991), Sachs links the experience of a mid 20th century woman seeking permission to use contraceptives to the modern fight for abortion access in the United States in order to critique the lack of progress towards protecting women’s health and safety. A combination home movies, personal remembrances, staged scenes, and found footage, The House of Science embraces the personal in the hopes that you can see yourself in it.
While I am not satisfied with how little Anderson attempted to speak to a contemporary audience in the rest of the film, her link of the personal experience outward when following Hanna's battle with lyme disease offers a raw representation of chronic illness that prioritizes women's health when it is not always taken seriously. As Hanna empties a handful of pills out of her pill organizer and receives a shot in the arm administered by her husband, each mundane task transforms into a larger conversation of chronic illness. Allowing these moments to take up space on screen becomes a form of resistance to the traditional narrative structures that often perpetuate stereotypes and gender norms associated with medical inequality.
Despite Kathleen Hanna's commitment to transgression and disruption as a musician, The Punk Singer surprisingly for adheres to conventional biographical documentary norms, missing an opportunity to fully explore Hanna's feminist avant-garde influences to create an experimental music documentary. The film excels when director Sini Anderson chooses to embrace the unconventional in its final act, employing extended, uninterrupted sequences to depict Hanna's battle with late-stage lyme disease and finally answer questions regarding her disappearance from the music industry. This stylistic departure from the rest of the film allows for a more immersive portrayal of Kathleen Hanna's prolific career, a choice I wish had been made sooner.