Monitoring Arizona Rangelands:

The Benefits of Cooperative Monitoring Programs

Introduction

Throughout the state, Cooperative Extension has been involved in rangeland monitoring as part of a collaboration with the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and U.S. Forest Service (USFS) since 2000. These programs assist agency staff and ranchers in collecting long-term vegetation trend data that can be used for adaptive range management or during the grazing permit renewal process.

Using interviews, focus groups, and surveys the Community Research, Evaluation, and Development team examined attitudes and behaviors of ranchers and agency staff toward rangeland monitoring. The team also examined the relationships between ranchers and agencies and each groups view of the role of Extension.

The evaluation included all county-based Extension monitoring programs: the Arizona Cooperative Rangeland Monitoring Program (ACRMP), the Southeastern Arizona Rangeland Monitoring Program, and Reading the Range.


ACRMP

Andrew Brischke, Rokelle Reeve, and Liz Delcamp

BLM Arizona Strip, Yuma, and Kingman Field Offices (red, orange, and yellow on map)

Southeastern Arizona

Kim McReynolds and Dustin Hancock

Coronado National Forest and BLM Safford Field Office (purple and pink on map)

Reading the Range

Ashley Hall

Tonto National Forest (blue on map)

Evaluation Results



  • Arizona ranchers recognize the value of rangeland monitoring.

  • Involvement with Extension is linked to the use of more monitoring methods.

  • Rancher-agency relationships are complicated but potentially improving.

  • Extension monitoring programs are viewed as key sources of reliable data.

  • Extension is a trusted source of information and expertise.



  • Monitoring is viewed as essential in order to maintain grazing permits on public lands.

  • All agency staff indicated that having long-term trend monitoring data was vital to defending their management decisions in the case of litigation.

  • Most staff felt confident they could easily win lawsuits because their decisions were backed up with reliable data.

  • Ranchers also thought that monitoring data provides an essential defense in the case of litigation.

  • Nearly all ranchers indicated that protection in the case of a lawsuit was a reason they participated in monitoring.


Future of Cooperative Monitoring Programs

As part of the evaluation, participants were also asked about the future of Extension and monitoring programs. Ranchers would like more training on how to interpret and use the monitoring data in their day-to-day management. Several ranchers also suggested changes in how Extension materials were disseminated, including revising the reports so they are more accessible to a lay audience and providing more frequent feedback on monitoring results.


Agency staff would like Extension to continue providing workshops that bring multiple agencies and groups together because having Extension, ranchers, USFS, BLM, Natural Resource Conservation Service, and Arizona State Land Department all around the same table greatly helped with keeping everyone on the same page.

  • USFS staff expressed they valued the Reading the Range program and the consistency it brought to the data. The staff expressed that they wanted to ensure the program continued and even expanded. They indicated more monitoring points might be needed to better understand pasture-level changes but recognized this might not be feasible with current staffing. In addition, they would like help with riparian management and monitoring and with browse monitoring.

  • BLM staff noted that changes are coming in regards to BLM monitoring protocols which might affect the monitoring program. BLM is moving towards nationwide implementation of Assessment, Inventory, and Monitoring protocols, which will focus more on the landscape-level. Since completion of this evaluation BLM management objectives have indeed changed, unfortunately leading to the end of cooperative monitoring with Kingman, Yuma, and Safford Field Offices.


Extension faculty and staff involved in these programs will build on the success encouraging the use of multiple monitoring methods, providing valuable and reliable data and expertise, and facilitating a productive dialogue between agencies and ranchers.

  • Reading the Range will be expanded to cover all grazing allotments on the Tonto National Forest by 2023.

  • ACRMP has expanded to cover three National Forests (Kaibab, Coconino, and Prescott) as of fall 2020.

  • The Southeastern Arizona program has expanded to include the Clifton Ranger District of Apache-Sitgreaves National Forest


Extension will continue to provide education on relevant and requested topics to agency staff and ranchers, with a focus on creating a place for various stakeholders to come together to talk about issues facing rangelands.



Given the overall value and trust placed in Extension by both ranchers and agency staff, it is clear Extension plays an important role in the future of rangeland management in Arizona.

Full Report

Arizona Extension Rangeland Monitoring Evaluation Report 07.31.2019 (2).docx

The full evaluation report prepared by the Community Research, Evaluation, and Development Team includes information about:

  • Background information on each monitoring program

  • Development of methods, focus groups and interviews

  • Respondent characteristics

  • Monitoring practices

  • Management practices

  • Rancher relationships with Bureau of Land Management and U.S. Forest Service

  • Rancher and agency perspective on the roles of Extension




Further information on rangeland resources and monitoring guides and tools can be found at https://extension.arizona.edu/rangeland-monitoring

Authors

Ashley Hall

Area Assistant Agent

Gila and Pinal Counties

AshleyS3@arizona.edu

Andrew Brischke

Area Assistant Agent and Interim Mohave County Director

Mohave and Coconino Counties

Brischke@arizona.edu

Kim McReynolds

Area Agent and Greenlee County Director

Greenlee, Graham and Cochise Counties

KimM@arizona.edu

Kara Haberstock Tanoue

Research Specialist, Senior

Kalynq@arizona.edu

DeeDee Avery

Evaluation Specialist

DAvery@arizona.edu

John Daws

Research Scientist

JohnDaws@arizona.edu

Michele Walsh

Associate Specialist and Professor

MWalsh@arizona.edu