Comprehension is understanding what is being said or read. When it comes to reading, it is an active process that must be developed to become a proficient reader. Effective reading is accomplished when the reader becomes proficient in literal, inferential and critical comprehensive reading.
Author’s write for specific purposes. An author’s purpose is simply their reason for writing. Some common purposes are to inform, to instruct, to entertain, or to persuade. Most textbook authors write for the purpose of informing (giving information, explaining) or instructing (teaching readers how to do something). However, some authors, such as newspaper editors or political writers, write to give their opinion and to persuade readers to agree with them. Finally, other authors such as humorists or certain newspaper columnists, write for the purpose of entertaining.
Sometimes an author may directly state their purpose. At other times, the author may feel the purpose is obvious and assume the reader can infer it.
To determine an author’s purpose, think about the words they have used. Authors often choose certain words because those words can direct or influence the reader’s thinking.
Authors also have specific audiences in mind when they write. An author’s intended audience consists of the people the author has in mind as readers. The intended audience will be a particular individual, a specific group, or the general public.
An author’s tone is a manner of writing that reveals or reflects their attitude toward a topic, just as a tone of voice reveals a speaker’s attitude. Authors rely on style of writing and choice of words to convey their tone. They select words and writing styles to fit their purposes for writing and their point of view. In other words, they use a certain tone to help convey their intended meaning. Descriptive words (adjectives) are used to describe an author’s tone.
Literal comprehension refers to what the author is actually saying. The reader must understand the ideas and information explicitly stated in the reading material. Some of this information is in the form of recognizing and recalling facts, identifying the main idea, supporting details and summarizing. Basically, the reader is just trying to understand what is happening within the text.
Examples of literal question starters:
What happened . . .?
How many . . .?
How did . . .?
Who . . .?
What is . . .?
Which . . .?
A topic is a word, name, or short phrase that tells who or what the author is writing about; it is the subject of the text. Often the topic may appear in the title or headings, special print - such as bold italics, or color font, and/or may be repeated throughout a text.
Determining the topic is the essential first step in comprehending a passage. It focuses your attention and helps you understand complex paragraphs.
A stated main idea is a sentence explicitly stated in the text, containing both the topic and the author’s most important point about this topic. It may be located anywhere within the text.
In academic writing, the thesis (main idea) is often explicit: it is included as a sentence as part of the text. It might be near the beginning of the text, but not always–some types of academic writing leave the main idea until the conclusion.
Journalism and reporting also rely on explicit thesis statements that appear very early in the piece–the first paragraph or even the first sentence.
First, ask yourself: “What is the topic?” Knowing the topic can help you find a writer’s main point about that topic. Look for words or ideas that are repeated. That’s probably the topic. The topic might even be stated in the title. Then, ask yourself: “What does the writer say about that topic?”
Start at the beginning. The main idea is often at the beginning—but not always.
Sometimes writers start with background information. Don’t confuse this with the main idea. Always ask yourself: “Does everything in the text support this one idea?” If not, then it is not the main idea.
Look for the general versus specific information. Writers use specific facts, figures, and other details to make a point. That point is usually the main idea, which is a general statement.
Also look for signal words. List words suggest the main idea. Addition words suggest details that, together, support the main idea. Sometimes a transition word that suggests contrast also points to the main idea. For a list of signal words, visit this website.
Supporting details provide additional information that helps the reader fully understand the main idea. In other words, supporting details explain, illustrate or prove the author’s point.
Major details (primary details): directly support the main idea
Minor details (secondary details): support, explain or elaborate the major details
The following image shows the visual relationship between the topic, main idea, and supporting ideas:
Support and elaboration consist of the specific details and information writers use to develop their topics. The key to developing support and elaboration is getting specific. Good writers use concrete, specific details and relevant information to construct mental images for their readers. Without this attention to detail, readers struggle to picture what the writer is talking about and will often give up altogether.
Two important concepts in support and elaboration are sufficiency and relatedness.
Sufficiency refers to the amount of detail — is there enough detail to support the topic? Good writers supply their readers with sufficient details to comprehend what they have written. In narrative writing, this means providing enough descriptive details for the readers to construct a picture of the story in their minds. In essay writing, this means the author finds enough information to support a thesis, and also finding information that is credible and accurate.
Sufficiency, however, is not enough. The power of information is determined less by the quantity of details than by their quality.
Relatedness refers to the quality of the details and their relevance to the topic. Good writers select only the details that will support their focus, deleting irrelevant information. In narrative writing, details should be concrete: they contribute to, rather than detract from, the picture provided by the narrative. In essay writing, information should be relevant to the writer’s goal and strengthen the writer’s ability to meet that goal.
Organizational patterns are authors’ ways of organizing information they present. They are also called writing patterns, patterns of development, and rhetorical patterns.
If you can identify the pattern the author is using in their writing, you will find it easier to comprehend what they are saying.
The video to the right addresses six common patterns of structure and development. These will be common in non-fiction, academic reading you do in college.
To recap, the six patterns in the video are:
Simple listing
Order of importance
Chronological order
Spatial development
Cause and effect
Comparison and contrast
Inferential comprehension refers to what the author means by what is said. The reader must “read between the lines” and make inferences about things implicitly (not directly) stated in the text. Certain ideas and concepts may be implied by the text, and they may not be apparent at first glance.
Examples of interpretive question starters:
Why did. . .?
What was. . .?
What do you think about. . .?
Can you explain. . .?
How was this similar to. . .?
Every text has a main idea, but not every text includes a stated (explicit) main idea sentence. When an author gives you the information needed to understand the main point without directly stating it in a sentence, the main idea is implied (implicit). The implied main idea is a sentence formulated by the reader that expresses the author’s main point about the topic. The reader must infer the main idea and create a sentence that expresses it.
Summarizing - condensing someone else’s ideas and putting it into your own shortened form - is one of the most effective strategies for monitoring comprehension: when you can accurately summarize what a text is saying, you can be assured that you’ve accurately captured the main idea of the text you’re reading.
Consider these guidelines for writing a summary:
A summary should contain the main thesis or standpoint of the text, restated in your own words. (To do this, first find the thesis statement in the original text.)
A summary is written in your own words. It contains few or no quotes.
If you quote anything from the original text, even an unusual word or a catchy phrase, you need to put whatever you quote in quotation marks (” “).
A summary is always shorter than the original text, often about 1/3 as long as the original. An article or paper may be summarized in a few sentences or a couple of paragraphs. A book may be summarized in an article or a short paper. A very large book may be summarized in a smaller book.
A summary should contain all the major points of the original text, and should ignore most of the fine details, examples, illustrations or explanations (minor details).
The backbone of any summary is formed by crucial (major) details (key names, dates, events, words and numbers). A summary must never rely on vague generalities.
A summary must contain only the ideas of the original text. Do not insert any of your own opinions, interpretations, deductions or comments into a summary.
Paraphrasing a Thesis Statement - Every piece of writing has a thesis statement, a sentence that captures the main idea of the text. Some are explicit—stated directly in the text itself. Others are implicit—implied by the content but not written in one distinct sentence.
A key part of understanding a thesis statement of a text is being able to express it in your own words. This paraphrase of a thesis is a key component in summarizing a reading accurately.
The video to the right offers advice for locating a text’s thesis statement. It asks you to write one or two sentences that summarize the text. When you write that summary, without looking at the text itself, you’ve actually paraphrased the thesis statement.
An Example of an Effective Paraphrase - Compare this direct quote, which comes from an article in The New York Times discussing the relocation and redevelopment of a train station in New York City, with an effective paraphrase:
Original Quote: “New tracks aside, the challenge is at the bare minimum to bring light and air into this underground purgatory and, beyond that, to create for millions of people a new space worthy of New York, a civic hub in the spirit of the great demolished one, more attuned to the city’s aspirations and democratic ideals.” – Michael Kimmelman, The New York Times
Effective Paraphrase: One of the biggest issues facing Penn Station’s revitalization is developing a brighter, airier space. It is an abysmal “underground purgatory,” and with so many New Yorkers and tourists traveling in and out of its doors every day, should be reconstructed to better reflect the endeavors and passions of the city (Kimmelman).
Make Inferences and Draw Conclusions - Making inferences is a comprehension strategy used by proficient readers to “read between the lines,” make connections, and draw conclusions about the text’s meaning and purpose.
Effective reading involves understanding not only what the author directly states, but also what the author suggests. An inference is a logical conclusion based on what an author has stated. A conclusion is a decision that is reached after thoughtful consideration of the information the author presents. For more information, watch the video to the right.
Making Inferences as You Read - To make inferences from reading, take two or more details from the reading and see if you can draw a conclusion. Remember, making an inference is not just making a wild guess. You need to make a judgment that can be supported by evidence from the text.
When you are asked an inference question, go back over the reading and look for hints within the text, such as words that are directly related to the question you may be asked (such as for a multiple-choice test) or words that indicate opinion.
Here is an example:
Hybrid cars are good for the environment, but they may not perform as well as cars that run only on gasoline. The Toyota Prius gets great gas mileage and has low emissions, making it a good, “green” option. However, many people think that it is unattractive. The Prius also cannot accelerate as quickly as other models and cannot hold as many passengers as larger gas-fueled SUVs and vans. Compared to similar gas-fueled options, hybrid cars also cost more money up front. A new hybrid car costs almost $3,500 more than the same car configured to run just on gasoline.
Which of the following can you infer from the passage?
Hybrid cars are more dangerous than other options.
Toyota is making a lot of money from the Prius.
Cars that use gasoline are going to destroy the environment.
Hybrid cars may not be the best choice for everyone.
All four answers are about hybrid cars in some way (the topic of the passage), but none of the answers can be found directly from the text. Read through and see what hints you can find from the text.
You will notice right away that there is nothing about car safety in the passage at all, so you can eliminate choice 1.
Choice 2 is implied: if the car cost $3,500 more than other cars, then Toyota would be making a lot of money by selling the car. But is it the most reasonable conclusion? To be sure, you need to go through all of the answers—don’t just stop when you find one that looks okay.
You may think that choice 3 is true. After all, people want to make hybrid cars because they believe that emissions are contributing to environmental damage, but this is not mentioned in the paragraph. Even if you think it is true, the answer has to be supported by the text to be the correct answer to the problem.
Choice 4 could be inferred from the text. If a person had a large family, was short on money, or needed a car that could accelerate quickly, then a hybrid might not be the best choice for them.
Now compare choice 3 with the other possible answer, choice 2. Now you are thinking choice 2 might not be as good an answer because you don’t know how much it costs Toyota to make the cars, and you don’t know how many they sell, so you can’t reasonably infer that they are making a lot of money! Choice 4 has to be the correct answer.
Figurative language is language that uses imagery to paint a picture in the reader’s mind. Figurative expressions are also called “figures of speech.” Because figures of speech do not literally mean what the words say, the reader must interpret their meaning. For example, if the author writes, “My supervisor is a rat,” they do not literally mean that they are a rodent. The reader is expected to interpret the implied meaning that the author dislikes their supervisor.
Below are different types of literary devices that make up figurative language:
Metaphors and similes both make comparisons. A metaphor is an implied comparison between two things that seem very different from each other on the surface, yet they are alike in some significant way. For example, in “Ann’s garden is a rainbow,” the writer makes a comparison between a garden and a rainbow to help the reader envision the garden’s colorful flowers. To interpret this metaphor correctly, the reader must determine what a garden and a rainbow have in common: a multitude of colors.
A simile is a comparison between two dissimilar things, but instead of saying that one thing is something else, the author says that one thing is like something else. A simile is usually introduced by the words “like” or “as.” For example, “The marine stood at attention as rigid as an oak tree.” In the example, a marine, because of their stiff posture, is compared with an oak tree. To understand a simile, determine which things are being compared and the important way in which they are similar.
Another type of figurative language is a hyperbole in which obvious exaggeration is used for emphasis. “My parents will explode if I get one more speeding ticket!” is an example. The parents would not literally “explode,” but the exaggeration conveys just how angry they would be.
In personification, nonliving or nonhuman things are given human characteristics or qualities. “My car groaned, coughed, and wheezed, then crawled to a stop” gives human attributes to a car to suggest it made strange noises and then quit running.
An allegory is a literary device in which characters, events, or settings symbolically represent abstract ideas, moral values, or historical events. This usually takes place as a story that symbolizes something else. In an allegory, the narrative often operates on two levels: the literal level (the surface story) and the symbolic level (where deeper meanings are conveyed). Allegories are often used to convey complex ideas in a more accessible and engaging manner, allowing readers to interpret the text on both literal and metaphorical levels. A famous example of an allegorical work includes George Orwell's Animal Farm, which represents the Russian Revolution and subsequent Soviet regime.
Symbolism is a literary device in which objects, characters, settings, or actions are used to represent abstract ideas or concepts beyond their literal meaning. These symbols often carry deeper layers of meaning and can evoke emotional responses or convey complex themes within a text. For example, in literature, a rose might symbolize love or beauty, while a dark, stormy night could symbolize fear or danger. Authors use symbolism to add depth and richness to their writing, allowing readers to interpret the text beyond its surface meaning. Symbolism is not limited to literature; it is also prevalent in art, religion, and culture, where objects or images take on meaning beyond their physical attributes.
Understanding figurative language can help the reader grasp the author’s message, and it makes text more interesting and enjoyable to read.
Some tricks to remember figurative language using word parts are:
Meta: Meaning “along with”
Sim: Meaning “similar” or “like”
Hyper: Meaning “over exaggeration”
Person: Meaning “person” or “human”
When you read critically, you read not only to understand the meaning of the text, but also to question and analyze the text. You want to know not just what the text says, but also how and why it says what it says. Asking questions is one key strategy to help you read more critically. As you read a text critically, you are also reading skeptically.
A critical reader aims to answer two basic questions:
What is the author doing?
How well is the author doing it?
To answer “what is the author doing?” begin by carefully examining the following:
What are the author’s claims (a claim is what the author says is true)?
What is the evidence (evidence is what the author offers to support what they say is true)?
What are the assumptions (assumptions are what the author says is true or will happen without giving any support)?
It may be helpful to try to see the argument from different angles:
How else could the author have written this piece?
What other kinds of evidence could have been used?
What difference would that other evidence make?
How has the author constructed their argument?
To answer “how well is the author doing it?” consider the following questions:
How effective is the introduction? Why might the author have started the piece with this paragraph?
Are the main ideas supported by solid evidence?
What evidence does the author use? Is it effective? Useful? Can you think of other evidence?
Is the author biased or neutral? How do you know?
Does the conclusion effectively tie the argument together? Could you draw a different conclusion from this evidence?
What kind of language is used? How would you describe the author’s style?
How is the piece organized?
To answer “how well is the author doing it?” from the point of view of a writer, not a reader, visit Chapter Nine.
Asking questions of a text helps proficient readers:
Predict what a text will be about
Identify confusing parts of the reading
Clarify what confused them
Develop a response to the text
Understand the author’s purpose for writing a text
The easiest way to develop questions about a text is to be aware of your thinking process before, during, and after reading.
What did you wonder about before you started reading?
What did you think the text might be about?
What questions did the text raise in your mind as you read?
What seemed important or surprising?
What were you wondering about when you finished reading?
What did the author hope to accomplish in writing this text?
Did they achieve that purpose?
What remains unresolved in your mind?
A fact is something that can be proved to exist or to have happened or generally assumed to exist or have happened. The process of proving that something is a fact (that it is true) is called verification. It requires experimentation and research or direct experience and observation.
Examples of factual statements:
In 1620 the Pilgrims landed in what is now Plymouth, Massachusetts.
Thousands of years ago, early people migrated from Asia to the North American continent by walking from Siberia to Alaska across the frozen Bering Strait.
An opinion is a judgment or belief that cannot be proved or disproved. When information in a statement cannot be proved to be either factual or false, it represents an opinion.
Not all opinions are equally valuable. Although opinions cannot be proved, they are valuable when they are supported by valid reasons and plausible evidence. Therefore, well-supported opinions are useful because they are based on facts or on the ideas of knowledgeable people.
Authors often use certain words or phrases to indicate they are presenting an opinion. Such as:
Perhaps
apparently
presumably
it seems likely
this suggests
in our view
In addition, words that indicate value judgements can signal opinions. Such as:
better
outdated
successful
worst
greatest
harmful
incompetent
effective
most
Congrats! You have finished this section of the lesson. Take a break and move onto the next section.
Visit the menu bar to find and click-on the next section in this lesson. The menu bar is located on the left of this page (or the top-left by clicking the three lines if viewing on a mobile devices).