If you are breathing, you are synthesizing. It's simply a matter of making connections or putting
things together. We synthesize information naturally to help others see the connections between things.
Although at its most basic level where a synthesis involves combining two or more pieces of evidence, synthesis writing is more difficult than it might at first appear because this combining must be done in a meaningful way. Think of quotes from different sources as pieces to a jigsaw puzzle, where once they are put together, the picture becomes clear. That "picture" is the body paragraph in which you are utilizing multiple sources.
In composition courses, synthesis commonly refers to writing about texts, drawing together particular themes or traits that you observe in those texts, and organizing the material from each text according to those themes or traits. Sometimes you may be asked to synthesize your own ideas, theory, or research with those of the texts you have been assigned.
In your other college classes, you’ll probably find yourself synthesizing information from graphs and tables, pieces of music, art works, etc. The key to any kind of synthesis is the same: combining different information to support a point.
You’re in a college composition course, and you’re asked to "synthesize." What does this even mean?
Synthesis, in its dictionary definition is: learning how to actively engage in various texts, think critically about authors’ different perspectives, and develop our own meanings.
At the very basic level, synthesis refers to combining multiple sources and ideas. When you look for areas where your sources agree or disagree and try to draw broader conclusions about your topic based on what your sources say, you are engaging in synthesis. As a writer, you will use information from several sources to create new ideas based-on your analysis of what you have read.
Therefore, in a nutshell, synthesizing finds and explicates links between materials for the purpose of constructing a a new idea.
When asked to synthesize sources and research, many writers start to summarize individual sources. However, this is not the same as synthesis.
In a summary, you share the key points from an individual source and then move on and summarize another source. A summary restates the information in one or more sources without providing new insight or reaching new conclusions.
A synthesis draws on multiple sources to reach a broader conclusion. In synthesis, you need to combine the information from those multiple sources and add your own analysis of the texts. This means that each of your paragraphs will include multiple sources and citations, as well as your own ideas and voice.
When you get to the upper-division and graduate levels of your academic career, you will enter the scholarly conversation on advanced topics in your field of study. Because of this, you need to show that you understand and can integrate research on these topics in a unique way that adds to the conversation.
Therefore, by synthesizing research, you are showing that you can combine current information in your field of study and add a new interpretation or analysis of those sources. You are now entering the conversation of the "experts"/sources. Your voice and ideas are being added as a legitimate contribution to your field. Cool!
There are two types of syntheses: explanatory syntheses and argumentative syntheses.
Explanatory syntheses seek to bring sources together to explain a perspective and the reasoning behind it.
Argumentative syntheses seek to bring sources together to make an argument.
Both types of synthesis involve looking for relationships between sources and drawing conclusions.
To effectively synthesize texts, you must first critically read the research on your topic.
Then, you need to think about how all of the ideas and findings are connected. One great way to think about synthesis is to think about the authors of the research discussing the topic at a research conference. They would not individually share summaries of their research; rather, the conversation would be dynamic as they shared similarities and differences in their findings.
Therefore, as you write your paragraphs, focus on a back and forth conversation between the researchers.
So, let’s break-down how to synthesize:
The first step in synthesis is to have at least two sources.
Sometimes, your instructor will provide these texts for you. Other times, you will find them on your own through something we like to call "research."
The second step in synthesis is reading, annotating, and analyzing the two texts. With your highlighter and pencil, mark passages of significance and make notes (also called annotations) that will help you synthesize the reading later. You might wonder what is considered "significant." Focus-on passages that help you address your essay's prompt, support your working thesis, and that you generally find interesting.
The key to a good synthesis is to be organized as you’re researching and reading sources on your topic. One way to organize your research is to use a synthesis matrix. In this chart, you can record your sources and main ideas on the topic. When finished, it will provide a visual representation of your research and help you to see how sources are connected.
In addition to a matrix, as you critically read your sources, take note of the following:
Do any authors disagree with another author?
Does one author extend the research of another author?
Are the authors all in agreement?
Does any author raise new questions or ideas about the topic?
The third step in synthesis is to recognize themes or traits that these texts have in common. Consider the following questions:
How do they compare with each other based on these traits you’ve recognized?
What would one author say about these themes or traits?
What would the other say?
In what ways would one author disagree with the other?
Basically, if these two texts were to have a conversation with each other, how would it go, and what would they say?
The final part of synthesizing two sources (and all of this must be done before you ever sit down to actually write a response or essay) is the act of creating something new through the integration of these two texts or sources. Synthesizing is analyzing. Once you’ve recognized shared traits or themes in your two sources, then it is time to create your own truth/idea from these two sources.
This is where you write your body paragraph by using multiple sources. Use transitions to show the connection(s) between the sources and to also indicate what your analysis is.
What you have found to be the common thread between the sources becomes your paragraph's topic sentence. Of course, though, still make sure that the topic sentence addresses your thesis.
For example, if one text calls for allowing more Syrian refugees into U.S. borders and another calls for stricter restrictions on immigration from Syria, you would find your own truth about the issue based on reading the two sources. This “truth” is essentially your topic sentence for your body paragraph.
Below is an example of a body paragraph with synthesized sources. Note: the in-text citations are in APA format, not the required MLA format for this course.
The key to writing any research essay is to read well in order to understand the main idea and developmental structure of the sources for the purpose of identifying points of contact between the various sources and your own argument.
In order to successfully synthesize your sources, you might begin by grouping your sources by topic and looking for connections.
For example: If you were researching the pros and cons of encouraging healthy eating in children, you would want to separate your sources to find which ones agree with each other and which ones disagree.
After you have a good idea of what your sources are saying, you want to construct your body paragraphs in a way that acknowledges different sources and highlights where you can draw new conclusions.
As you continue synthesizing, here are a few points to remember:
Utilize transitions to connect the sources together and to indicate what your analysis is.
Use your writing to do the thinking for the reader. It is your job to draw conclusions for the reader. Don't expect the reader to do this.
Organize your information in such a way that readers (audience) can immediately see where the information from the sources overlap.
Makes sense of the sources and help the reader (audience) understand them in greater depth.
Don’t force a relationship between sources if there isn’t one. Not all of your sources have to complement one another.
Do your best to highlight the relationships between sources in very clear ways.
Don’t ignore any outliers in your research. It’s important to take note of every perspective (even those that disagree with your broader conclusions).
Utilize the example below to help you write your own body paragraph with synthesized resources. The in-text citations follow MLA guidelines, just like our class.
Notice the "experts tell us" phrase that tells us that the author is combining the ideas of experts about "opposition to immigration" and then gives us examples.
Notice how the italicized portions trace the coherence in the sources expressed by the repeated key words that relate to economic objections or questions.
This is important when there are two different sources; they are made to work together to form a coherent discussion of the idea expressed in the topic sentence through the efforts of a third independent writer (YOU). And yes, it is your job to be that third "synthesizing" writer.
There are several things you should keep in mind while beginning to attempt writing body paragraphs that use synthesis. Below lists things to avoid and things and things you should try to do:
Here are a few things it is usually best to avoid:
AVOID constructing the body of your paper out of a series of summaries.
This is the most common error that writers fall into when first attempting this kind of essay. Since you already know how to write summaries (Remember the Critique?), it is easy to think that a synthesis is just a summary of different sources. It's not; writing a true synthesis is a different, more demanding, and more sophisticated task. Why? Because a mere collection of summaries, while much easier to produce, has one very serious shortcoming. Keep in mind that written sources dealing with the same topic typically include many of the same facts and arguments (usually just phrased differently). So, if you just summarize each source in turn, you usually end up just presenting the same ideas over and over—whether you realize it or not. It's up to you to digest and rearrange material from your sources. Simply summarizing them puts the emphasis on your sources and not where it belongs—on your thesis. Remember, your sources should provide evidence for YOUR thesis. Use your sources; don't be dominated by them.
AVOID bombarding your reader with undifferentiated masses of facts, examples, and
quotations.
Most writers do this in an effort to be "objective." But overwhelming your readers with
information usually does not convince, but rather confuses them. If you find your paragraphs going on for pages and 'pages, it's usually a good sign that you have NOT arranged your material for the convenience of your reader. You should organize your data to make it accessible; you should interpret the data to help the reader understand how the sources relate to each other and your thesis.
AVOID beginning your paragraphs by presenting quotations or facts from your sources.
That's an example of the cart pulling the horse. It's much easier to start by telling your reader what point YOU want to make. Remember, when writing in general it’s usually more effective to start from a general point and move to specifics. One tried and true method is to begin your paragraphs with topic sentences that spell out one of the supporting arguments for your thesis. Then use material borrowed from your sources as evidence to illustrate or elaborate the point made in your topic sentences.
When synthesizing, try to do the following:
Once you've done your research, try to start by carefully formulating your thesis. Know what point you are trying to prove and then make sure the rest of your essay sticks to that point and supports it. This is probably good advice for any kind of essay, but especially important for this kind. Synthesized essays, like the Multiple Source and Researched essays, require that you draw on more source material than you might be used to. Having a well formulated thesis will keep you and your readers from getting bogged down in competing facts and opinions.
Try to write complete sentences stating each of the supporting points you want to use to support your main point—or thesis. Then use these sentences as topic sentences for your paragraphs. This way each paragraph can proceed from the general supporting point of the topic sentence to specific facts, quotes, and paraphrases from your sources (material that gives authority to your own points). You can draw on points from your sources in order to expand, develop, support, and/ or illustrate your main ideas.
For specific facts, quotations, and paraphrases, always identify your sources. Introduce quotations by putting the name of the writer you drew the material from into your text whenever possible, preferably before the quoted material. If you are quoting someone, it's always a good idea to tell your reader why he or she should listen to that person. Tell your reader something about the quoted writer to establish him or her as an expert or an authority. Remember, for any borrowed material you use, you will need to be sure to provide citations in the text that will direct your audience to more complete information about your sources on the Works Cited page.
Below are two examples of synthesis: one where synthesis is NOT utilized well, and one where it is.
Parents are always trying to find ways to encourage healthy eating in their children. Elena Pearl Ben-Joseph, a doctor and writer for Kids' Health, encourages parents to be role models for their children by not dieting or vocalizing concerns about their body image. The first popular diet began in 1863. William Banting named it the “Banting” diet after himself, and it consisted of eating fruits, vegetables, meat, and dry wine. Despite the fact that dieting has been around for over a hundred and fifty years, parents should not diet because it hinders children’s understanding of healthy eating.
In this sample paragraph, the paragraph begins with one idea then drastically shifts to another. Rather than comparing the sources, the author simply describes their content. This leads the paragraph to veer in an different direction at the end, and it prevents the paragraph from expressing any strong arguments or conclusions.
An example of a stronger synthesis can be found below:
Parents are always trying to find ways to encourage healthy eating in their children. Different scientists and educators have different strategies for promoting a well-rounded diet while still encouraging body positivity in children. David R. Just and Joseph Price suggest in their article “Using Incentives to Encourage Healthy Eating in Children” that children are more likely to eat fruits and vegetables if they are given a reward (855-856). Similarly, Elena Pearl Ben-Joseph, a doctor and writer for Kids Health, encourages parents to be role models for their children. She states that “parents who are always dieting or complaining about their bodies may foster these same negative feelings in their kids. Try to keep a positive approach about food” (Ben-Joseph). Martha J. Nepper and Weiwen Chai support Ben-Joseph’s suggestions in their article “Parents’ Barriers and Strategies to Promote Healthy Eating among School-age Children.” Nepper and Chai note, “Parents felt that patience, consistency, educating themselves on proper nutrition, and having more healthy foods available in the home were important strategies when developing healthy eating habits for their children.” By following some of these ideas, parents can help their children develop healthy eating habits while still maintaining body positivity.
In this example, the author puts different sources in conversation with one another. Rather than simply describing the content of the sources in order, the author uses transitions (like "similarly") and makes the relationship between the sources evident.
The basic steps of synthesis are…
Get your sources (either assigned or researched).
Read them closely. Recognize and analyze themes, traits, or patterns.
What does each source say?
Recognize the conversation between the sources.
What are their shared themes, traits, topics, and/or patterns?
Formulate your paragraph based-on your analysis and observations.
What do you have to say in the conversation between these sources?
What is your truth (synthesized from your reading)? This is your topic sentence!
Now that you have an idea of how to synthesize sources within a body paragraph, utilize these tools to help you with your own papers:
This tutorial does a nice job at teaching what synthesis is and how to do it.
This synthesis matrix provides a table to help you organize your sources in a way that helps you synthesize them.
Feeling blown away? Relax. Remember, put to use your skills of summarizing and analyzing that you have been using all semester to use. You've got this!
Synthesis, just like everything else you've learned, is a process, one that with practice, will eventually become second nature to you. :)
Congratulations! You are done with this lesson. You are now ready to check your understanding with this lesson's comprehension quiz, which can be found in our class's Canvas shell.
Be sure to review your notes and ask questions before hand for clarity if needed.