@The Arts Unit Creative Classes
@The Arts Unit Creative Classes
Student debating resource developed by The Arts Unit
Years 5 to 8 debating
You will:
describe a change using a narrative structure
explain a change using a listing structure
rebut using mechanisms
apply your understanding of mechanisms in a debating game.
Use mechanisms to enhance your arguments and rebuttals.
You'll need:
a device to watch the videos
your debating journal and a pen.
Watch the video Mechanisms in debating – narrative structure with Hugh Bartley and learn how mechanisms can be used in debates.
Mechanisms in debating – narrative structure
Duration: 06:09Answer the following questions in your debating journal:
What is a ‘mechanism’ in debating?
Explain what a narrative structure entails.
How does it help if you explain the motivations of stakeholders?
Have a go at explaining the mechanisms for this topic using a narrative structure. Make sure that when you tell the ‘story’, you make it clear where the change happens and how the two possible stories go in different directions.
Note: If you want to learn more about stakeholders, have a look at the Characterisation in debates Creative Class.
Topic: That toys should not be split into separate aisles for boys and girls (affirmative).
Outcome: Kids will develop broader interests.
What is the change (in the topic)?
How does the change lead to this outcome?
Need some help?
The change is that toys will be stacked on shelves in a way that doesn’t separate them into ‘boys’ and ‘girls’ categories. Instead, they might be organised by age only.
You could describe the ‘story’ of a kid or their parent shopping before and after the change. What toys will kids purchase before the change? How will this change encourage toy companies to use less gender-specific packaging? What might kids discover and purchase after the change? How will this broaden their interests?
Topic: That toys should not be split into separate aisles for boys and girls (affirmative).
Outcome: Kids will feel more confident.
How does the change lead to this outcome?
Not sure where to start?
You could describe the story of a (hypothetical) girl who enjoys playing with trucks and cars. How might she feel having to shop in the ‘boys’ aisle? How will she feel after the change? How about a boy who loves to play with dolls? How will he feel before and after the change?
Watch the video Mechanisms in debating – listing structure to learn how you can use a listing structure to explain mechanisms.
Mechanisms in debating – listing structure
Duration: 01:58Have a go at explaining the mechanisms for these topics using the listing structure. List all the different ways that the change will lead to the outcome.
Topic: That kids should do 30 minutes of physical activity each morning at school (affirmative).
Outcome: Kids are healthier.
What is the change (in the topic)?
How does the change lead to this outcome?
Need some help?
The change is that kids are doing more physical activity. How would 30 minutes of physical activity lead to being healthier?
Be specific as you explain all the ways that physical activity leads to healthier kids. Think about physical health, mental health, social skills and so on. You can also explain how developing healthy habits leads to a healthy lifestyle.
Topic: That kids should do 30 minutes of physical activity each morning at school (negative).
Outcome: Students will learn less.
What is the change (in the topic)?
How does the change lead to this outcome?
Not sure where to start?
The change is that students will be spending time on physical activity instead of other school work.
List all the ways that this will cause them to miss out on learning. How many minutes of learning will be lost each week? Will they be tired from the physical activity? Will they be distracted from learning? Will they get injured and have to go to sickbay?
Use mechanisms in rebuttals.
Mechanisms can also be used in rebuttals to explain errors in the other team’s arguments.
Watch the video Using mechanisms in rebuttals to learn how.
Using mechanisms in rebuttals
Duration: 01:11Use either a narrative or a listing structure in the following arguments and rebuttals.
Don’t forget to be specific in your examples and think about the motivations of stakeholders.
Note: If you want to learn more about how to structure rebuttals, check out the Creative Class – That’s debatable!
Topic: That we should eat more home-cooked meals (affirmative).
Outcome: It will save people money
What is the change (in the topic)?
Explain how the change leads to this outcome.
Need some assistance?
The change is that we will be spending money on bulk ingredients for cooking instead of paying for takeaway food. How would this be cheaper?
Be clear in your examples. For example, how much does it cost to make your own cup of tea or coffee and how much do you pay at a café? How much does it cost to make a sandwich or a muffin, and how much would you pay for one at a café?
Argument: That more home-cooking will save people money.
Rebuttal: Home-cooking will actually cost more money.
Explain how home-cooking can be the more expensive option.
Not sure where to start?
Think about the costs associated with home cooking: ingredients, cooking equipment, driving to the store and cost of utilities (your refrigerator, dishwasher, microwave and so on).
Be specific in your explanation and examples. For example, think about how much food you would have to buy to make a healthy meal like tuna and avocado sushi (rice, nori seaweed sheets, tuna, mayonnaise, avocado, sesame seeds, vinegar, sugar and soy sauce). You may also need to purchase equipment such as a makisu (bamboo rolling mat) and perhaps a rice-cooker.
How much would it cost to buy all of these items? In comparison, would it be cheaper to buy a roll of sushi from a local restaurant?
Topic: That we should eat more home-cooked meals (affirmative).
Outcome: More family time.
What is the change (in the topic)?
How does the change lead to this outcome?
Argument: More home-cooking leads to more family time.
Rebuttal: More home-cooking actually means less time with family.
Explain how home-cooking often means less time with family.
Apply your skills to the debating game ‘Why, why, why?’
Play this game with 2 or more people.
Watch the video Example of game ‘Why, why, why? with Hugh Bartley and Tony Davey going head to head – who will be crowned Master of Mechanisms?
Read the game instructions below to learn how to play before trying out the game yourself!
Example of game ‘Why, why, why?'
Duration: 03:48Why, why, why? – game instructions
Make a circle (so there is a clear order).
Student 1 states a change that will happen. It can be serious or a bit ridiculous.
For example: ‘Everyone in Australia should have a pet cat’, ‘High school students should have to study politics as a subject’ or ‘Sidewalks should be replaced with swimming lanes’.
The next student gives an outcome of that change.
For example: If the change was ‘That the internet should be banned’, a possible outcome could be that people become more intelligent. If the change was ‘People should get to decide how much they pay for items’, a possible outcome could be that the economy would collapse.
Each person then has to give one reason why that change will cause that outcome (that is, explaining the mechanism). Go around the circle so each person has a turn.
Keep going until someone can’t think of a new reason. If you can’t think of a reason, you are eliminated from the game.
Repeat steps 2-5, eliminating one person each round. Continue until one person remains. They are the winner!
Congratulations!
You have completed this
@The Arts Unit Creative Class.