Answer these 5 questions after you watched this video. Between 50-100 words (for every question) write your answers in your individual Google Site under:
Week 6, Reflective Lessons from Video 1
Level 1: Remembering
What is creative thinking? Define it and list at least four characteristics of creative thinkers based on academic sources.
Level 2: Understanding
Explain why creative thinking is important in solving the problem of low student participation in the case study.
Level 3: Applying
Apply one creativity technique (e.g., brainstorming, mind mapping, reverse thinking) to propose two solutions for improving classroom participation.
Level 4: Analyzing
Analyze how different creative solutions may lead to different outcomes in student engagement. What are the strengths and weaknesses of each approach?
Level 5: Evaluating
Evaluate the most effective creative strategy to improve student participation. Justify your choice using theory, logic, and real examples from education or your experience.
Answer these 5 questions after you watched this video. Between 50-100 words (for every question) write your answers in your individual Google Site under:
Week 6, Reflective Lessons from Video 2
Level 1: Remembering
What are the key components of effective communication mentioned in the text? List and define at least three components using your own words and one academic reference.
Level 2: Understanding
Explain why the student in the case study failed to communicate effectively. Which elements of communication (e.g., listening, non-verbal cues, audience awareness) were missing?
Level 3: Applying
Apply the principles of effective interaction to suggest two specific improvements the student can make to enhance audience engagement during the presentation.
Level 4: Analyzing
Analyze how verbal communication, non-verbal cues, and audience awareness interact to influence communication effectiveness in the case study.
Level 5: Evaluating
Evaluate which communication skill (verbal clarity, non-verbal communication, or audience awareness) is the most critical in this situation. Justify your answer with examples from academic or professional contexts.
Answer these 5 questions after you watched this video. Between 50-100 words (for every question) write your answers in your individual Google Site under:
Week 6, Reflective Lessons from Video 3
Level 1: Remembering
What is credibility of information? Define the concept and list at least four characteristics of a credible source using one academic reference.
Level 2: Understanding
Explain the differences between academic and non-academic sources. How do these differences affect the reliability of information?
Level 3: Applying
Apply credibility evaluation criteria (authorship, evidence, bias) to analyze the two articles. Which source is more credible and why?
Level 4: Analyzing
Analyze how bias and lack of expertise can influence the quality of information in one of the articles. What indicators reveal this?
Level 5: Evaluating
Evaluate the risks of using non-credible sources in academic work or real-life decision making. Justify your answer with examples from education, media, or society.
Answer these 5 questions after you watched this video. Between 50-100 words (for every question) write your answers in your individual Google Site under:
Week 6, Reflective Lessons from Video 4
Level 1: Remembering
What is interpersonal communication? Define the concept and list at least four key characteristics based on academic sources.
Level 2: Understanding
Explain why the communication in the case study was ineffective. Which elements (verbal, non-verbal, or persuasive communication) were missing or weak?
Level 3: Applying
Apply principles of effective interpersonal communication to suggest two ways the student could improve their interaction during the discussion.
Level 4: Analyzing
Analyze how verbal communication, non-verbal cues, and persuasive strategies interact to influence the outcome of the discussion.
Level 5: Evaluating
Evaluate which factor (verbal clarity, non-verbal communication, or persuasive strategy) is most important in influencing group acceptance. Justify your answer with examples from academic or real-life situations.