1. PUBLICATION AND POSTING
Embedded Files
2. SUBMISSION AND RECEIPT OF APPLICATIONS
3. INITIAL EVALUATION
4. COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT
Under the new Merit Selection Plan, a total of thirty (30) points shall be obtained from the ETE (Education, Training and Experience) while seventy (70) points shall be taken from evaluative assessments (Performance, Outstanding Accomplishments, Application of Education, Application of Learning and Development, and Potential)
Under the new Merit Selection Plan, a total of thirty (30) points shall be obtained from the ETE (Education, Training and Experience) while seventy (70) points shall be taken from evaluative assessments (Performance, Outstanding Accomplishments, Application of Education, Application of Learning and Development, and Potential)
For Non-Teaching, Related-Teaching and School Administration Positions, the points are determined in excess of the minimum qualification requirements as defined in the CSC-approved Qualification Standard (QS)
For Non-Teaching, Related-Teaching and School Administration Positions, the points are determined in excess of the minimum qualification requirements as defined in the CSC-approved Qualification Standard (QS)
While the ETE points are determined through the use of Increments Table and the Rubrics for Computation of Points for ETE, premium is given to applicants who have shown proofs of the application of education and learning as part of the evaluative assessments.
While the ETE points are determined through the use of Increments Table and the Rubrics for Computation of Points for ETE, premium is given to applicants who have shown proofs of the application of education and learning as part of the evaluative assessments.
Non-Teaching Criteria
Non-Teaching Criteria
Related-Teaching Criteria
Related-Teaching Criteria
School Admin Criteria
School Admin Criteria
EXAMPLE:
With the use of the Increment Table and the Rubrics for Computation of Points, the ETE points are determined by:
With the use of the Increment Table and the Rubrics for Computation of Points, the ETE points are determined by:
1. identifying the ETE level point of the applicant;
1. identifying the ETE level point of the applicant;
2. getting the increment by subtracting the CSC-QS level points from the ETE level points, and
2. getting the increment by subtracting the CSC-QS level points from the ETE level points, and
3. looking for the corresponding score of the increment in the Rubrics.
3. looking for the corresponding score of the increment in the Rubrics.
A. EDUCATION-TRAINING-EXPERIENCE (ETE) SCORES COMPUTATION
Step 1: Identify the ETE level points
Based on the Increment Table for Education, the education level of Applicant Durian is 5 points, Applicant Mangosteen is 5 points and Applicant Caimito is 6 points.
Based on the Increment Table for Education, the education level of Applicant Durian is 5 points, Applicant Mangosteen is 5 points and Applicant Caimito is 6 points.
In terms of Training, Applicant Durian has 4 points, Applicant Mangosteen has 4 points and Applicant Caimito has 2 points. In terms of Experience, the applicants have 14 points, 9 points and 6 points, respectively.
In terms of Training, Applicant Durian has 4 points, Applicant Mangosteen has 4 points and Applicant Caimito has 2 points. In terms of Experience, the applicants have 14 points, 9 points and 6 points, respectively.
Step 2: Get the increment by subtracting the CSC-QS level points from the Applicants' ETE
level points.
Explanation:
For Education Criterion, Applicant Durian as well as Applicant Mangosteen have just met the CSC-Qualification Standard (Level 5), so both get zero (0) increment while Applicant Caimito has exceeded the Basic Qualification Standard by one level, so he gets 1 point (Level 6 - Level 5).
The three (3) applicants have obtained varied increments in the Training and Experience criteria.
Step 3: Look for the corresponding score of the increment in the Rubrics for Computation of Points.
Based on the Rubrics for the Computation of Points, the three (3) applicants have obtained the total ETE scores of 23 points for Applicant Durian, 15 points for Applicant Mangosteen, and 6 points for Applicant Caimito.
B. COMPETENCY ASSESSMENTS
B1: Performance
IMPORTANT REMINDERS IN THE COMPUTATION OF PERFORMANCE SCORE
For positions with no Experience requirement, the Eligibility Rating shall be used - based on Division HRMPS Board deliberation.
In case of adjectival Performance Rating, the midpoing value shall be used.
For applicants who graduated with honors, their Performance Points are determined based on the level of scholastic performance.
NOTE:
For positions with no Experience requirement, the Performance Points shall be obtained from Eligibility Rating (to be transmuted into 100% and multiplied by the Experience highest possible score) - based on Board recent deliberation; however, the performance rating shall be used when available. For positions with no requirements for both Experience and Eligibility, the Performance Points shall be obtained from Education General Weighted Average (GWA) which is to be transmuted into 100% and multiplied by the Experience high possible score; however, if either the Performance Rating or the Eligibility Rating is available, the same shall be used. Based on the DO 7 s 2023, if the position has Experience requirement and the applicant has no Performance Rating, the applicant shall be given zero (0) for the Performance criterion.
B. COMPETENCY ASSESSMENTS
B2: Outstanding Accomplishments
B2: Outstanding Accomplishments
B.2.1. Awards and Recognition
a. Citation and Commendation
a. Citation and Commendation
b. Academic and Inter-School Award
b. Academic and Inter-School Award
c. Outstanding Employee Award
c. Outstanding Employee Award
EXAMPLES:
Applicant Durian
Applicant Durian
Applicant Mangosteen
Applicant Mangosteen
Applicant Caimito
Applicant Caimito
IMPORTANT NOTES:
1. The Points Allocation shown in the tables shall serve as the maximum or ceiling points that may be earned for each component. The points earned from each component are cumulative to determine the total points for Outstanding Accomplishments; but not to exceed the weight allocation for the said criterion.
2. Automatic five (5) points for General Services positions and ten (10) points for other groups of positions shall be given for awards by reputable award-giving bodies; like, Civil Service Commission, MetroBank, NEDA, DepEd CO, etc. Eligible outstanding accomplishments should be only those earned after the last promotion.
3. Awards from the same award-giving body such as searches that are progressive (nominative to a higher level), only the highest award shall be considered.
4. Applicants to General Services position who underwent a search process for Outstanding Employee Award (1.c) and has been conferred the Award, the computation of points indicated in the Outstanding Employee Award (1.c) shall apply, whichever is higher shall prevail.
B2: Outstanding Accomplishments
B.2.2. Research and Innovation
B2: Outstanding Accomplishments
B.2.3. Subject Matter Expert / TWG or Committee Membership
B2: Outstanding Accomplishments
B.2.4. Resource Speakership / Learning Facilitation
Means of Verification
Means of Verification
Rubrics for Computation of Points
Rubrics for Computation of Points
IMPORTANT NOTES:
In order to get points for Resource Speakership / Learning Facilitation, the individual must have developed and delivered the content of the Resource Speakership / Learning Facilitation. If the individual merely delivered it, the mere delivery of the topic shall not be provided points.
B2: Outstanding Accomplishments
B.2.5. NEAP Accredited Learning Facilitator
EXAMPLES:
Applicant Durian
Applicant Durian
Applicant Mangosteen
Applicant Mangosteen
Applicant Caimito
Applicant Caimito
B. COMPETENCY ASSESSMENTS
B3: Application of Education
Positions with NO Experience Requirement
Positions with NO Experience Requirement
Positions with Experience Requirement
Positions with Experience Requirement
EXAMPLES:
Applicant Durian
Applicant Durian
Applicant Mangosteen
Applicant Mangosteen
Applicant Caimito
Applicant Caimito
B. COMPETENCY ASSESSMENTS
B4: Application of Learning and Development
For General Services Positions
For General Services Positions
For Other Position Groups
For Other Position Groups
(Means of Verification)
(Means of Verification)
For Other Position Groups
For Other Position Groups
(Rubrics)
(Rubrics)
EXAMPLES:
Applicant Durian
Applicant Durian
Applicant Mangosteen
Applicant Mangosteen
Applicant Caimito
Applicant Caimito
B. COMPETENCY ASSESSMENTS
B5: Potential (Written Test, Behavioral Events Interview, Sample Test)
Written Examination
Written Examination
Skills or Work Sample Test
Skills or Work Sample Test
Behavioral Events Interview
Behavioral Events Interview
IMPORTANT NOTES:
1. With Skills or Work Sample Test, the Test and Evaluation Rubrics must be designed by subject matter expert relevant to the position to be filled.
EXAMPLES:
Applicant Durian
Applicant Durian
Applicant Mangosteen
Applicant Mangosteen
Applicant Caimito
Applicant Caimito
A. RELATED-TEACHING: EDUCATION, TRAINING AND EXPERIENCE (ETE)
B. COMPETENCY ASSESSMENTS
B.1. Performance
IMPORTANT NOTES:
The MOVs and general rules for computation of points for Related-Teaching Positions are generally the same with the computation of points for Non-Teaching Positions, except...
there are no General Services positions under Related-Teaching;
the weight allocation is different; hence, there is the need to adjust the rubrics for Outstanding Accomplishments, Application of Education, Application of Learning and Development, and Potential.
B. COMPETENCY ASSESSMENTS
B.2. Outstanding Accomplishments
B.2. Outstanding Accomplishments
B.2.1. Awards and Recognition
Academic or Inter-School Awards (MoVs and Rubric)
Academic or Inter-School Awards (MoVs and Rubric)
Outstanding Employee Award (MoVs)
Outstanding Employee Award (MoVs)
Outstanding Employee Award (Rubrics)
Outstanding Employee Award (Rubrics)
B.2. Outstanding Accomplishments
B.2.2. Innovation or Research
B. COMPETENCY ASSESSMENTS
B.3. Application of Education
Application of Education w/o Experience Requirement
Application of Education w/o Experience Requirement
Application of Education with Experience Requirement
Application of Education with Experience Requirement
(Means of Verification)
(Means of Verification)
Application of Education with Experience Requirement
Application of Education with Experience Requirement
(Rubrics for Computation)
(Rubrics for Computation)
B. COMPETENCY ASSESSMENTS
B.4. Application of Learning and Development
Means of Verification
Means of Verification
Rubrics for Computation of Points
Rubrics for Computation of Points
B. COMPETENCY ASSESSMENTS
B.5. Potential
A. RELATED-TEACHING: EDUCATION, TRAINING AND EXPERIENCE (ETE)
B. COMPETENCY ASSESSMENTS
B.1. Performance
IMPORTANT NOTES:
The MOVs and general rules for computation of points for School Administration Positions are generally the same with the computation of points for Related-Teaching Positions, except...
award as Trainer or Coach is added as a criterion under Awards and Recognition;
the weight allocation is different; hence, there is the need to adjust the rubrics for Outstanding Accomplishments, Application of Education, Application of Learning and Development, and Potential.
B. COMPETENCY ASSESSMENTS
B.2. Outstanding Accomplishments
B.2. Outstanding Accomplishments
B.2.1. Awards and Recognition
Outstanding Employee Award
Outstanding Employee Award
(Means of Verification and Rubrics)
(Means of Verification and Rubrics)
Award as Trainer or Coach
Award as Trainer or Coach
(Means of Verification and Rubrics)
(Means of Verification and Rubrics)
B.2. Outstanding Accomplishments
B.2.2. Innovation or Research
B.2. Outstanding Accomplishments
B.2.3. Subject Matter Expert / Member of NTWG or Committee
B.2.4. Resource Speakership / Learning Facilitation
B.2.5. NEAP Accredited Learning Facilitator
B.3. Application of Education
B.4. Application of Learning and Development
IMPORTANT NOTES:
The MOVs and general rules for computation of points for School Administration Positions are generally the same with the computation of points for Related-Teaching Positions in the abovementioned criteria.
B. EVALUATIVE ASSESSMENTS
B.5. Potential
Entry-Level Principal Position -
Entry-Level Principal Position -
PMAT or NQESH results serve as scoring basis
PMAT or NQESH results serve as scoring basis
Promotion to Higher Principal Positions
Promotion to Higher Principal Positions
(Experts to develop Written Examination)
(Experts to develop Written Examination)
5. APPOINTMENT
FOR QUERIES AND FURTHER INFORMATION:
Please call the Division HRMO at 0995-479-7639 or visit us at DepEd SDO Biliran, Government Center, Larrazabal, Naval, Province of Biliran
Page updated
Report abuse