2024-01-01 Mondaine bloody mundaine
I must have dreamed a thousand dreams
Been haunted by a million screams.
2023-06-28 Wednesday.
So Young Gentlemen and or Damsels, adventurers from German speaking Countries:
are you are still on the trail ? ; well, I will lend you a hand. THIS ADVENTURE IS YOURS ! This is certainly not unlike "In the name of the Rose" or "Da Vinci Code". It’s far more real than it may appear, as mysterious as it can get, has a history of centuries, the text and history suddenly appear actual. How can this be, one might ask.
Well, my dear friends, the answer is not that simple: you are reading more than one book that is still “alive”. Yes, “living” books that changes its content according to your mood, your curiosity, and your imagination. Books that can take you to any place and time you desire, if you are willing to follow its clues and riddles. A book that can make you laugh, cry, gasp, and shiver with delight. A book that is more than a book, it is an adventure. And you are the hero of this adventure, so don't give up now. You are about to discover the greatest secret of all time...
…the publication in 1486 of Heinrich Krämer and Jacob Sprenger’s Malleus maleficarum (“The Hammer of Witches”),
The publication title is translated as "The Hammer of Witches". In this text dubbed by “HH” or “MM” – these seem to be the works of James/Jacob Sprenger and Henry /Heinrich Krämer/Kraemer.
As you can see, there is quite some ambiguity surrounding the name of writers, left alone the MM contents, that is not for me to interpret or witness.
The Witch Hammer (HH) has many versions and of that, counterfeit copies. This was likely to get the distribution going, with the important ambiguous attribution, that falsified signatures would render the counterfeit copy of the MM unauthorized.
Now about the signs and signatures.
The MM was written by James/Jacob Sprenger and Henry/Henrich Krämer/ Kraemer, of which I said that these names mark the counterfeits. These people might even have existed, but they are more likely (too obvious) obscured by (too obvious) pseudonyms.
For this reason alone, I wouldn’t read, the MM, because of its paradoxical contents, it may be spellbound, and that is “not to me” to judge what is a counterfeit. I only ask those Germans scientists/forensic researchers/adventurers who likely already know more, if they did the forensics on every copy, they could get hold of brought up new
It appears only Kraemer and Sprenger are combinations. Now on the “Name of the Rose” did you, touch the pages, the ink? Hm
“SPERR GENE MARKER”
But -nothing said with it, I found the anagram too easy. Who am I in this story? I question myself that sometimes, but not with this. I cannot deny from WHO this comes because :
Why? This is likely not about misinterpretation of MM History alone, in which many innocent people were sentenced to death. It raises the question of the rituals and words may be spellbound.
I am aware from who this may be, or IS, and it’s got a new meaning in the present because this history has never been reported. Now I’ve grown old, and I have seen this world many times, perhaps its to the next generation to fill in how it all Ends…. (I think not).
Prepare for some recursive thoughts: the signatures may be markers or markings of something else, another context, that would be…. of the Master.
“SPERR GENE MARKER”
This is not just from any master.
this is not just from anyone in the entire history of humankind
this is a master that wants to let us know
this is the master that I never liked until he reveals himself
this is exactly his modus operandi to give me question this in German language, by proxy,
knowing that it is not about “blocking biomarkers” (that could be one of the directives but…)
This message reveals more than its identity, because the Master “who always knows it all” has this in German Language for a reason. That is a sign that I must not read these manuscripts, instead people, forensic researchers must discover (or already know it’s information/function to be extracted from “IT”.
There must be something to distill it from so, paper, ink, any sign of DNA to recover from the copies, the paper, the ink(s) the originals, anything.
The master foresees that not only the truth (that appears evident to me only is strange) of the copies, because it also a rather peculiar message of Hope.
I know my thing or two about SARS-CoV-2, Omicron (which is a WHO reference to me. Coincidentally with the threats I sent them),
The anagram is there to catch the ‘immediate’ attention (if all else fails). But I know it’s a linguistic reference to the other copies of that manuscripts, in ways that I cannot verify, thus it remains where it is deposited.
Because it is a message of Hope
“SPERR”
phonetic it holds more than one meaning.
(KEEP IN CASE ... ./ HERE ARE ... ) SPARE GENE MARKER”
This suggests a motive to look out for there may be many biogenetic references found, perhaps even DNA containers or pointers to regions/proteine zones that may even appear the in the found manuscripts. All in all, given the severity and timing, I see how this relates to Sars-CoV-2, Corona "pandemic", I think it’s also telltale about the additional manuscripts, that looks like the parity/proofreading (only) polymorphic to its own 32 kilopair of genetic informatioon, that its identified as (one of the) "Genetic Defense(s)" of that virion. So watch out the paper, ink, anything that was touched with a finger. of the Master... is it Sealed?
…in Germany, and Heinrich (Institoris) Kraemer, professor of theology at the University of Salzburg, Austria, and inquisitor in the Tirol region of Austria. In 1484 Pope Innocent VIII issued the bull Summis desiderantes affectibus, in which he deplored the spread of witchcraft in Germany and authorized Sprenger and Kraemer to…
…the publication in 1486 of Heinrich Krämer and Jacob Sprenger’s Malleus maleficarum (“The Hammer of Witches”),
Heinrich Krämer is Kraemer.
“Sperr Gene Marker”
“Malleus maleficarum, (Latin: “Hammer of Witches”) detailed legal and theological document (c. 1486) regarded as the standard handbook on witchcraft, including its detection and its extirpation, until well into the 18th century. Its appearance did much to spur on and sustain some two centuries of witch-hunting hysteria in Europe. The Malleus was the work of two Dominicans: Johann Sprenger, dean of the University of Cologne in Germany, and Heinrich (Institoris) Kraemer, professor of theology at the University of Salzburg, Austria, and inquisitor in the Tirol region of Austria. In 1484 Pope Innocent VIII issued the bull Summis desiderantes affectibus, in which he deplored the spread of witchcraft in Germany and authorized Sprenger and Kraemer to extirpate it.
The Malleus codified the folklore and beliefs of the Alpine peasants and was dedicated to the implementation of Exodus 22:18: “You shall not permit a sorceress to live.” “In Part I the reality and the depravity of witches is emphasized, and any disbelief in demonology is condemned as heresy. Because of the nature of the enemy, any witness, no matter what his credentials, may testify against an accused. Part II is a compendium of fabulous stories about the activities of witches—e.g., diabolic compacts, sexual relations with devils (incubi and succubi), transvection (night riding), and metamorphosis. Part III is a discussion of the legal procedures to be followed in witch trials. Torture is sanctioned as a means of securing confessions. Lay and secular authorities are called upon to assist the inquisitors in the task of exterminating those whom Satan has enlisted in his cause.
The Malleus went through 28 editions between 1486 and 1600 and was accepted by Roman Catholics and Protestants alike as an authoritative source of information concerning Satanism and as a guide to Christian defenses.
The Devil, whose central role in witchcraft beliefs made the Western tradition unique, was an absolute reality in both elite and popular culture, and failure to understand the prevailing terror of Satan has misled some modern researchers to regard witchcraft as a “cover” for political or gender conspiracies. The Devil was deeply and widely feared as the greatest enemy of Christ, keenly intent on destroying soul, life, family, community, church, and state. Witches were considered Satan’s followers, members of an antichurch and an antistate, the sworn enemies of Christian society in the Middle Ages, and a “counter-state” in the early modern period. If witchcraft existed, as people believed it did, then it was an absolute necessity to extirpate it before it destroyed the world.
Because of the continuity of witch trials with those for heresy, it is impossible to say when the first witch trial occurred. Even though the clergy and judges in the Middle Ages were sceptical of accusations of witchcraft, the period 1300–30 can be seen as the beginning of witch trials. In 1374 Pope Gregory XI declared that all magic was done with the aid of demons and thus was open to prosecution for heresy. Witch trials continued through the 14th and early 15th centuries, but with great inconsistency according to time and place. By 1435–50, the number of prosecutions had begun to rise sharply, and toward the end of the 15th century, two events stimulated the hunts: Pope Innocent VIII’s publication in 1484 of the bull Summis desiderantes affectibus (“Desiring with the Greatest Ardour”) condemning witchcraft as Satanism, the worst of all possible heresies, and the publication in 1486 of Heinrich Krämer and Jacob Sprenger’s Malleus maleficarum (“The Hammer of Witches”), a learned but cruelly misogynist book blaming witchcraft chiefly on women. Widely influential, it was reprinted numerous times. The hunts were most severe from 1580 to 1630, and the last known execution for witchcraft was in Switzerland in 1782. The number of trials and executions varied widely according to time and place, but in fact no more than about 110,000 persons in all were tried for witchcraft, and no more than 40,000 to 60,000 executed. Although these figures are alarming, they do not remotely approach the feverishly exaggerated claims of some 20th-century writers.
SPARE / SPERR GENE MARKER
(p)reserve, contain/contents may have additional genetic biomarkers
We may have a chance at recovering from SARS-CoV-2
well "may" is that "we" must first acknowledge or establish truth of statements above. Do we really?
if you can't then I am mistaken but: I am not.
There is no real answer to question: "If I had eaten the cheese of this, to have this cardinal knowledge", the literal translation of a DUTCH saying "of ik daar kaas van heb gegeten: Ik wel", usually to denote the lack of certain knowledge that is being discussed over a topic. But in any case (pun) : I did I surely did.
To me it's undeniable, unmistakably that a certain Master ia at work, that riddles the vulgar MM to the one Dutch person in German, to know it's phonetic misheard for English.(response to the looksenpa00eepser).
rest assure, it's THE ENGLISHMAN🌟🪄😉 and he came in a little late or me too early.
But AINT THAT GRAND ! THE MOST CARING AND LOVING PERSON I'VE KNOWN, (I regret my doings so much),
Go find out, and, perhaps! tell me how it goes or how it went? You are part of THIS!
The greatest restoration of all times! Believe it or not, it is the greatest of our time!
You will see the miracle, which is a wonder and wizardry of the highest of them ALL.
its not Gandalf : nothing compares to his kindness. But who knows...