One of the most valuable things I’ve learned during my field experience is how powerful it can be to step back and really look at the whole student—not just their test scores. I recently gave a learning style inventory to four of my 4th-grade students and compared the results with their i-Ready reading data. That simple step helped me better understand not just how they learn, but how that connects to their academic growth, their confidence, and how they show up in the classroom every day.
The inventory I used was straightforward and age-appropriate. Students just had to reflect on what kind of activities helped them learn best—visual, auditory, or kinesthetic. What I found made a lot of sense.
“Spider-Man” is a visual and kinesthetic learner who’s reading at a Grade 3 level. His vocabulary is pretty solid, but he still needs support in comprehension. He’s more engaged when he can move or see things mapped out clearly.
“Wonder Woman” came out as strong in all three learning styles. She’s reading at an early 4th-grade level and has already passed her stretch growth goal. She’s confident, flexible, and a natural peer leader.
“Black Widow” is also a visual and kinesthetic learner, performing at a mid 4th-grade level with strong comprehension. “Batman” falls into that same category—visual and kinesthetic—and is also on grade level, but he needs movement and repetition to stay focused and really retain what he’s learning.
This reinforced what I already believed: learning styles don’t exist in a vacuum. They’re connected to everything else—how students process information, how they socialize, how they handle frustration, and how ready they are to take on challenges.
Now that I know how each student learns best, I can make more intentional choices during planning. For my visual learners (Spider-Man, Black Widow, and Batman), I use color-coded organizers, anchor charts, and visual timelines. For kinesthetic engagement, I plan cut-and-paste foldables, gallery walks, and hands-on tasks like building story maps with physical pieces. For auditory learners like Wonder Woman, I make sure to include read-alouds, partner discussions, and echo reading.
The i-Ready data showed me that Spider-Man and Black Widow still need support with comprehension. Batman is doing well, and Wonder Woman is ready for enrichment. Based on this, I would group them strategically during lessons, scaffold for the students who need it, and offer choice for the ones who are ready to stretch.
I also try to tap into their interests—if a student loves superheroes, sports, or art, I pull that into the lesson. It makes learning feel more personal and gives them a reason to engage. I’ve found that student ownership grows when they feel like they have a voice in their learning. Choice boards, reflection check-ins, and leadership roles have worked well for that.
Assessments should reflect how students learn too. For visual learners, I’ll offer drawing or graphic response templates. For kinesthetic learners, I might let them act something out or build a response. For auditory learners, I’d offer the chance to record a voice explanation.
I try to always offer at least two ways to show understanding, whether it’s drawing, writing, or explaining verbally. That way, students can choose the method that makes the most sense for them. It also gives me better insight into what they really know.
Giving that learning style inventory at the beginning of the experience helped me look beyond scores and see each student more clearly. It confirmed what I’ve felt all along—if we want to help students grow, we have to teach them in ways that make sense for them. As I continue in my career, I’ll always start with student data and student voice. Because when we honor how they learn, we build classrooms where every student can grow and thrive.
Dunn, R., & Dunn, K. (1993). Teaching Secondary Students Through Their Individual Learning Styles. Allyn & Bacon.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The Differentiated Classroom: Responding to the Needs of All Learners (2nd ed.). ASCD. https://files.ascd.org/staticfiles/ascd/pdf/siteASCD/publications/books/differentiated-classroom2nd-sample-chapters.pdf
Gay, G. (2018). Culturally Responsive Teaching: Theory, Research, and Practice (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press. https://www.design.iastate.edu/imgFolder/files/Culturally_Responsive_Teaching_Geneva_Gay.pdf