Dr. Ocampo, a renowned public historian, argues that Rizal’s heroism lies not in myth but in his deep sense of responsibility and humanity. In a recent lecture, he revisited Rizal’s letters from Europe, where homesickness and a longing for the Philippines are powerfully expressed. He also challenged the popular belief that Rizal wrote “Sa Aking Mga Kabata”, saying that evidence suggests he did not.
Dr. Ambeth R. Ocampo’s approach is not about tearing down a hero—it’s about rebuilding a deeper connection to him. His interviews and lectures remind us that Rizal’s legacy is not in the statues or currency, but in his writings, questions, and principles, which remain alive when we engage with them critically.
Dr. Floro C. Quibuyen, a respected historian and professor, offers a more nuanced view of José Rizal’s role in Philippine history. Contrary to the widespread belief that Rizal rejected the revolution outright, Dr. Quibuyen argues that Rizal’s opposition to the Katipunan was rooted in his concern for preparedness—not in loyalty to the Spanish regime.
In A Nation Aborted, Quibuyen explains that Rizal believed education, national consciousness, and unity were essential before launching an armed revolt. He presents Rizal not as an enemy of the revolution, but as someone deeply invested in meaningful and sustainable change for the Filipino people.
"Rizal’s life was a moral revolution. He understood that without a foundation of justice, discipline, and moral integrity, any violent revolution would fail. He believed in transforming the Filipino from within before challenging the colonial system from without." - Dr. Raul J. Bonoan
Dr. Bonoan emphasizes that Rizal’s conscience was his most radical weapon. While he did not endorse the Katipunan’s armed uprising, his refusal to seek exile, his final writings, and his willingness to die for his people reflect a different but equally powerful form of revolutionary action—one grounded in ethical responsibility.
Jose Rizal’s Time in London
Could you tell us about José Rizal’s stay in London and its significance? - Interviewer ask Dr. Dantos
Dr. Santos: Rizal’s time in London, from 1888 to 1889, was a pivotal period in his life. He went there primarily to study ophthalmology under Dr. Louis de Wecker at University College London and to further his education. But beyond academics, London exposed Rizal to a broader perspective on political ideas, liberal thought, and the burgeoning nationalist movements of the time.
While no interviews with Rizal himself exist, eyewitness accounts from witnesses and contemporaries paint a picture of a composed man. For instance, Dr. José Mercado, Rizal’s friend, described Rizal as calm and courageous in his final moments. Other witnesses noted that he maintained his dignity and even expressed forgiveness towards his executioners.
Many view Rizal’s last moments as a powerful testament to his unwavering love for the Philippines and his commitment to justice. His calm acceptance is often seen as a reflection of his deep faith and conviction.