Your review should contain:
A brief summary of the paper (3-4 sentences). This should clearly identify the key insights (usually no more than 2) used in the paper.
A (bulletized) summary of the salient points made in the paper.
A critique of the limitations.
A “broader perspective” section, which could include things like:
your assessment of the importance of the paper.
open issues not addressed in the paper.
other areas in which the insights might apply.
You need not write a review larger than a page.
Please email me the review in PDF format.
The review is due before class begins on the day of the corresponding presentation. Late reviews will be penalized.
Here are some papers that would be good candidates for your paper presentations. The list below is by no means comprehensive — feel free to add/suggest papers you find interesting.