To begin, Anthony Doerr implements disabled characters into the writing of his book “All the Light we cannot see”. When incorporating disability into a novel there are risks of misrepresentation. One way a disability can be misrepresented is through aesthetic blindness which ultimately depicts blindness as a consequence or as being in a state of ignorance. It can also bring about unrealistic and offensive stereotypes. Doerr however represents blindness in a more seemingly correct way. The main character Marie-Laure is blind and becomes blind in a way that does not indicate consequence. He starts the novel off with the information that she is blind which takes away the dramatic effect of her becoming blind. Doerr also shifts the focus quickly. This takes away the emphasis of the disability and almost normalizes it. He also creates the idea that perceiving the world can come in ways other than sight. Doerr uses language that plays to other senses, showing that a disability does not always completely hold a person back. She is still able to learn and “see” the world through her other senses. Overall, Doerr represents disability in an almost acceptable way and steers clear of aesthetic blindness.
Morals and humanistic approaches
Anthony Doerr showcases World War II through the perspectives of the main characters Marie-Laure and Werner Pfenning. Through the story he implements the moral struggles and internal conflict of war. This challenges the normal representation of war stories by highlighting the emotional effects of war. Ordinary people are affected by the brutality. This idea is not normally represented and people often are ignorant of the impact war can have on the regular person. Doerr shows that moral ambiguity and uncertainty is very apparent in times of conflict. He deep dives on kindness and making ethical decisions is still possible during dark times. Doerr shows the characters having to make tough moral decisions emphasizing how war can affect ethics. Doerr also highlights human connections and how they affect people. The main characters help each other even though they are on opposing sides. This shows what human connections do and how they can override evil.
Doerr continues his humanistic impact by the structure of the novel. The chapters go back and forth between the main characters and allows the reader to develop empathy and see both perspectives. Also, since the novel does not follow a chronological order of events, it allows for past times to be brought up which ultimately adds to the analysis on psychological issues due to war. This creates reflection as a main theme of the novel and adds to the sense of moral ambiguity.
Doerr represents women in the victim position in many ways. One way this is shown is through the main character's reliance on her father. Due to the war her father left and she seems helpless afterwards. This highlights the main character as a victim due to the war and represents women as being dependent on a man. Another way victim hood is shown is through getting bullied. Marie is bullied for her disability as well as her gender. This exemplifies women being reduced to their gender or disability instead of who they really are. During the bullying she is referred to as almost an object which dehumanizes her. Doerr overall represents the victimization through male adolescent humor. This makes victimization into a form of entertainment and makes humor out of a serious situation. To continue, another form of victimization is through warfare. A character is shown writing letters to her brother in which she complains about the labor she has to do while men are at war. This enforces the narrative that men are superior and more capable of tough labor. This also shows how while women are helping, they are not as important as the men and therefore inferior. Also within the letter she reinforces her brother and is encouraging which highlights the caregiver role of women. They are often portrayed as caregivers and must push down their own issues and traumas which are the result of patriarchal expectations.
While Doerr does not appear to show signs of using aesthetic blindness in his writing, deeper analysis shows there may actually be some aspects of negative perspective towards blindness. Looking at statistics the blind are only asked 10% of the questions. Also, when asked questions the majority are about health. This shows the belief that disability equals unintelligent. It also emphasizes unfair or untrue stereotypes. Marie seems to be incapable of doing many tasks which represents this untrue stereotype. In addition, disabled characters were usually given words with negative connotations which plays to the consequent sense of being blind. It also belittles the blind by portraying them as almost useless. In comparison, those non-disabled were given more positive language. Overall, Doerr does implement some aspects of disability bias.