Korean Peninsula at a crossword: Eight years of InterKorean Relation and the prospects of unification

Speaker: Prof. Dr. Sang Yoon Ma, The Catholic University of Korea 

Date & Time: Monday, 18th August, 11:30 AM – 1:00 PM 

Venue: Room 105, First Floor 

Organised by: Centre for East Asian Studies (CEAS), Christ University 

Inaugural session 

The Centre for East Asian Studies (CEAS), Christ University, organised a distinguished lecture on “Korean Peninsula at a Crossroad: Eight Years of Inter Korean Relations and the Prospects of Unification” by Prof. Dr. Sang Yoon Ma, The Catholic University of Korea. The session began with an opening address by Prof. Manoharan, who highlighted Korea’s post–World War II development, resilience, and its role in contemporary geopolitics. He welcomed distinguished guests including faculty members, representatives from the Korean Association and students. He also introduced Prof. Ma’s academic journey, pointing out his thesis on Korea in the 1960s, and his associations with Oxford’s St. Antony’s College, Brookings Institution, and intelligence services in Korea. 

Keynote Address by Prof. Dr. Sang Yoon Ma 

Prof. Ma delivered an elaborative and deeply insightful speech, tracing the historical evolution of division, the regime rivalry between the two Koreas, and the shifting regional and global dynamics that continue to shape unification process. 

Highlights of the Lecture 

1. Division and Contrasts Between North and South Korea 

Using detailed maps of Asia and East Asia, Prof. Ma illustrated Korea’s geopolitical stand surrounded by great powers and military bases. He showed the significant sharp contrast: South Korea as a developing economic power versus North Korea’s stagnation and isolation. He described unification as a “Sisyphean task,” complicated by 80 years of persistent division and geopolitical rivalries between both the countries. 

2. Core Questions

 Why has the division persisted? 

Should unification still be pursued?

If so, what strategies and resources are needed, especially given the US-China competition, the Russia–Ukraine conflict, and shifting power politics in East Asia?

 3. Historical Origins of Division 

Liberation in 1945 and later division under US and Soviet rule along the 38th parallel. Establishment of contradictory political systems and the outbreak of the Korean War. Leaders like Syngman Rhee (South) and the North Korean leadership followed starkly different paths — Rhee visualised a strong anti-communist state, while the North amalgamated power under a dynastic authoritarian regime. The role of the United Nations (1947 elections) and Cold War geopolitics structured the division. 

4. Post–Cold War Era and elevated Expectations 

The fall of the Berlin Wall and German unification heightened the hopes for Korea. The disintegration of the Soviet Union left North Korea diplomatically excluded while South Korea’s system gained legitimacy and strength. South Korea under President Roh Tae-woo pursued Nordpolitik and signed the InterKorean Basic Agreement. However, as South Korea favoured economic growth and global integration, the unification process lost priority. 

5. North Korea’s Isolation and Nuclear Turn 

The 1988 Seoul Olympics heightened North Korea’s anxiety, leading to attacks and irritations. As the Soviet Union distanced itself, North Korea looked inward, increasingly depending on nuclear weapons for regime survival and international leverage. This marked the beginning of the fading hope for unification, with nuclear development challenging the whole peace efforts. 

6. Policy Attempts and Failures

Engagement strategies such as the Sunshine Policy brought temporary openings but clashed with North Korea’s perception of regime threat. Hard line policies and intermittent inter-Korean summits failed to create lasting breakthroughs. The collapse of the 2019 Hanoi Summit between the US and DPRK marked a clear halt in dialogue. 

7. Contemporary Geopolitical Challenges 

Korea’s position is deeply affected by US-China rivalry, Russia’s resurgence, and shifting regional alliances. North Korea leverages its nuclear arsenal and it strengthens ties with China and Russia to balance isolation. South Korea faces a dilemma: balancing security partnerships at the same time addressing internal divisions over unification. 

8. South Korean Public Opinion and Generational Shift 

While older generations remember war and division, younger South Koreans focus on their careers and economic contributions, with less emotional attachment to unification. 

9. Conclusion: Peaceful Coexistence as an Interim Goal 

Prof. Ma stressed that peaceful cohabitation may be the most realistic approach in the near future, aligning with North Korea’s push for a “two-state” theory. Unification remains as a ray of hope, but coexistence is the urgent priority in Korea’s geopolitical reality. 

Open Discussion / Q&A Session

 The discussion, moderated by Dr. Jojin V. John, engaged students and faculty with inquisitive questions. 

Q1. What is China’s official stance on Korean unification? 

Answer: China’s concern lies in the aftermath of unification under South Korean leadership, which would expand US influence on its borders. Its position is therefore cautious and strategic rather than supportive of unification. 

Q2. Why did the 1960 revolution and policy changes not result in unification?

 Answer: While South Korea achieved economic progress, these reforms or policies did not address the actual structural political divisions. Thus, reunification never became reality. 

Q3. What role do North Korean defectors play? 

Answer: With around 35,000 defectors in South Korea, they shape public opinion and act as information channels. Their presence reflects societal ruptures but also Prospective channels of cooperation. 

Q4. How should North Korea’s diplomatic activities and denuclearization efforts be viewed?

 Answer: Denuclearization remains questionable, as nuclear weapons are very much important to North Korea’s survival strategy. Sunshine Policy-like approaches, though attractive in principle, face deep resistance from Pyongyang. 

Q5. Could North Korea’s nuclear weapons benefit a unified Korea?

 Answer: No. South Korea’s NPT commitments and alliances with the US prevent nuclear armament. Thus practically it's not possible and also North Korea’s nuclear program instead destabilizes the peninsula.

 Q6. How do younger generations in South Korea see unification? Answer: Younger South Koreans largely view unification as a distant issue. Their focus is on jobs and contributing to economic development rather than resolving historical hostilities, because unlike their previous generation, they don't have much memories of division or conflict. 

Vote of Thanks 

The event concluded with a vote of thanks by Mr. Anurag Tripathi, who underscored the continued importance of Korean unification in a world where constant conflicts occur, drawing parallels with South Asia. He also highlighted the collaboration between CEAS, MG University, and UniKorea in making the event possible. Prof. Sang Yoon Ma was honoured with a token of appreciation, presented by Prof. Pillai in the presence of Prof. Manoharan. 

The lecture provided a thorough overview of the Korean Peninsula’s historical evolution, the challenges raised by the competition between both the countries and the role of global geopolitics. The discussion highlighted that while unification remains as an enduring dream, peaceful coexistence represents as the most practical and urgent priority in today's world.