Research

(joint with Giacomo Gallegati, Luca Favero and Enrique Carreras)

Abstract: Connections predict career success across many occupations, including academia, where conference participation builds professional networks. This paper experimentally tests whether academic affiliation influences conference acceptance. Using a matched-pair field experiment during the review phase of an early-career economics workshop, we randomly assign papers with and without author affiliations to reviewers. We find a strong bias favoring prestigious institutions, reducing diversity by lowering the representation of women and first-generation graduates. This bias is primarily driven by in-group favoritism from reviewers at similarly ranked institutions. Our findings highlight how affiliation bias reinforces inequalities and limits academic diversity. 

Awarded the Paul David Best Junior Paper Award (2025) at the Annual Workshop on the Organisation, Economics and Policy of Scientific Research.

News! I'll be presenting this paper at the EEA Congress in Bordeaux in August, and at the Conference on Diversity, Equity and Inclusion in Economics, Finance, and Central Banking in Paris in November.

Draft available soon!

Abstract: Understanding the factors that contribute to the success of recent graduates is crucial in today's competitive job market. Given the widespread use of educational credentials as proxies for ability, examining which agents might value and use this information, and how, is a question of significant policy relevance. This paper examines the causal impact of Latin honors (Cum Laude) on labor market outcomes for Master’s graduates. Combining university records with a graduate survey and administrative employment spells data, I leverage the Cum Laude eligibility rules to implement a regression discontinuity analysis. The findings show that while the Cum Laude does not translate into a premium in terms of earnings or job search, it makes graduates more likely to hold an intellectual or scientific profession. The distinction causes graduates to sort out of highly-paid industries, like finance and insurance, and into sectors such as education and health assistance, for which entry is usually regulated by public examinations, wages are relatively lower, and employment more stable. Moreover, the Cum Laude makes males, but not females, more likely to work in research. Ultimately, these findings suggest that academic distinctions can act as signals of ability for the recipients and affect their aspirations and job search behavior, also shaping the choice of pursuing further education.

Presented: Workshop IdEP in Sustainable Economics (Università della Svizzera Italiana), Leuven Economics of Education Research (LEER - KU LEUVEN), 38th Annual Conference of the European Society for Population Economics (ESPE), 6th World Labor Conference (SOLE-EALE-AASLE)

News! I'll be presenting this paper at the 40th AIEL Conference in Milan in September

Draft available upon request

Abstract: Using University administrative data matched with a student survey, I estimate the effects of class rank on job preferences, labor market expectations, and early career outcomes. I find that being top of the class increases academic orientation, pushing graduates to pursue further education or training and to postpone labor market entry. Higher-ranked students are willing to accept more precarious employment contracts in exchange for jobs allign better with their studies, suggesting a role for motivation and subject enjoyment. Effects are stronger for males and in peer groups with higher average ability, indicating that competition with peers influences rank effects at this stage.