Aristotle's Metaphysics and the Science of Middle-Sized Things
Public Lectures and a Discussion in the Chapel of the Resurrection at Pusey House, Oxford. This event took place on 1st May 2024 and was part of a three-day Colloquium in Oxford which was funded primarily by The Civitas Institute of The University of Texas at Austin.
Speakers: George Ellis and Robert Koons, Chair: Mark Harris, Principal Organiser: William Simpson
Photo by Andrew Moore - George Ellis (left) and Robert Koons (right)
Video from Live feed
Special thanks is due to the Centre for Theology, Law and Culture at Pusey House, Oxford, for graciously hosting these lectures and discussions.
George Ellis - How the Science of the Middle-Sized Restores Purpose
I will discuss how the universe can seem a purposeless and amoral place if one looks at it exclusively on very large or small scales. Indeed, many scientific specialists of the very large or very small have claimed that there is no purpose in the universe. Paradoxically, however, they are ignoring the nature of their own lives on the middle-sized scale at which they exist; more specifically, how their existence within the physical world as ‘open systems’ enables purpose, meaning, and ethics to be effective in causing physical outcomes. The middle-sized scale is particularly important for biology where meaning and function are often denied due to focussing on the molecular scale alone.
Robert Koons - Is Aristotle’s Philosophy of Nature Scientifically Obsolete?
Aristotle’s philosophy of nature dominated much of the world’s science from late antiquity until the 17th century and beyond. In this Aristotelian world, human beings and the middle-sized objects that we perceive and manipulate were among the first-class citizens of nature, imbued with real causal powers and potentialities. The period of “classical” physics (from Galileo to Rutherford) seemed to eliminate the need for key elements of Aristotle’s scheme, including substantial forms for composite objects, natural powers and potentialities, and teleology. I argue that the Quantum Revolution has altered the epistemic landscape in ways that re-open questions of natural philosophy that have long been taken to be settled, laying the foundation for a neo-Aristotelian or “hylomorphic” interpretation of quantum theory. This interpretation successfully bridges the gap between the domain of quantum entities and the world of actual experiments and observations, and, as a further bonus, reconciles what Wilfred Sellars called the manifest image of ordinary human life with our best scientific image of nature.