SYSTEM-INPUTS AND PROCESSES
S.1.Graduate education being the apex of the educational system, its curriculum showcases the best of the academic and intellectual products and processes of the system through the development of the following competencies:
S.1.1. acquisition of knowledge and theories based on the field of specialization;
S.1.2. application of the theories to real problems in the field; and
S.2. There is a system of validation of subjects taken from other schools.
IMPLEMENTATION
I.1. The curriculum/program of study meets the requirements and standards of CHED as follows.
I.1.1. Master's thesis program – 36 units inclusive of (6) units thesis;
I.1.2. Master's non-thesis program inclusive of six (6) integrating courses - 36 units
I.1.3. For thesis Master's Program: Competencies to undertake research in specific areas with the broad field of educational science and practice; and
I.1.4. For Doctoral Programs: new knowledge and strategies in specific areas within the broad field of educational science and practice.
I.6. The following activities are undertaken to ensure quality in the process of curriculum development:
I.6.1. participative planning and designing of the curriculum by the following stakeholders:
I.6.1.1. administration;
I. 6.1.2. faculty;
I.6.1.3. students;
I.6.1.4. alumni;
I.6.1.5. representatives from the industry/sector; and
I.6.1.6. others (please specify)
I.6.3. confirmation of the curriculum by the BOR/BOT
OUTCOME/S
O.1. The curriculum is responsive and relevant to the demands of the times.
SYSTEM-INPUTS AND PROCESSES
S.1. There is an institutional outcomes-based standard format in the preparation of course syllabi.
S.4. Copies of all course syllabi in previous terms are filed for reference purposes.
S.6. There is a mechanism to facilitate the teaching-learning process.
IMPLEMENTATION
I.1. The Dean or official concerned approves the updated syllabus for each subject.
I.2. The faculty prepares syllabi with comprehensive contents.
I.3. The faculty revise and enhances the syllabi preferably every two years and as needed.
I.4. The faculty distributes a copy of the syllabus to each student.
Teaching Methods and Techniques
I.6. Classroom instruction is enriched through the use of the following strategies:
I.6.1. symposia, seminars, workshops, professional lectures;
I.6.2. educational tours/learning visits/other co-curricular activities;
I.6.3. peer teaching/cooperative learning; and
I.6.4. computer-assisted instruction (CAI) and computer-assisted learning (CAL).
I.7. At least three (3) of the following course requirements are used:
I.7.1. group/individual projects;
I.7.2. group/individual reports;
I.7.3. group/individual term papers;
I.7.4. performance activities;
I.7.5. learning contract;
I.7.6. portfolio;
I.7.8. learning modules; and
I.7.9. others (please specify)
I.8. Instruction is enriched through the use of at least ten (10) of the following techniques/strategies:
I.8.7. dimensional question approach;
I.8.9. buzz sessions;
I.8.10. informal creative groups;
I.8.11. interactive learning;
I.8.12. team teaching;
I.8.13. micro teaching;
I.8.14. macro teaching;
I.8.15. tandem teaching;
I.8.16. peer teaching;
I.8.17. multi-media/courseware/teach ware;
I.8.18. experiments;
I.8.20. type study methods;
I.8.23. others (please specify)
I.10. Instruction is enhanced through the following:
I.10.1. submission of approved and updated syllabus for every subject/course;
I.10.2. regular classroom observation/supervision;
I.10.3. regular faculty meetings with the College/Academic Dean/Department Chair;
I.10.4. regular faculty performance evaluation;
I.10.5. attendance/participation of faculty in in- service training;
I.10.6. conduct of experimental classes; and
I.10.8. adoption of instructional delivery modes such as modules, e-learning, on-line, etc.
I.12. Varied, multi-sensory materials and computer programs are utilized.
OUTCOME/S
O.1. Course syllabi are updated and approved by concerned authorities.
O.2. Varied teaching strategies and techniques are efficiently and effectively used.
O.3. Instructional materials produced by the faculty are copyrighted/patented.
SYSTEM-INPUTS AND PROCESSES
S.1. The program of studies has a system of evaluating students performance through a combination of the following:
S.1.1. formative tests such as quizzes, unit tests;
S.1.2. summative tests such as mid-term and final examinations;
S.1.3. project and term papers;
S.1.4. practicum and performance tests; and
S.1.5. other course requirements.
S.2. The summative tests have the following descriptions:
S.2.2. based on well-designed Table of Specifications (TOS).
IMPLEMENTATION
I.1. Varied evaluation measures are used, such as:
I.1.4. paper and pencil tests;
I.1.6. group/individual reports;
I.1.7. groups/individual projects; and
I.1.8. others (please specify)
I.2. Evaluation tools/instruments are reviewed and revised periodically.
I.3. The faculty are trained how to assess student performance properly.
I.4. The College/Academic Unit encourages and supports assessment for multiple intelligences.
I.6. The system of student evaluation and grading is defined, understood, and disseminated to:
I.6.3. academic administrators; and
OUTCOME/S
SYSTEM-INPUTS AND PROCESSES
S.1. There are policies on management of learning which includes the following:
S.1.1. student’s attendance in class and other academic activities;
S.1.3. student’s discipline; and
S.1.4. maintenance of cleanliness and orderliness.
IMPLEMENTATION
I.1. The policies on management of learning are enforced.
I.2. Student activities are well-planned and implemented.
I.3.The faculty continuously guide every student in the class for independent study and research
I.4. Outputs are submitted on time.
OUTCOME/S
SYSTEM-INPUTS AND PROCESSES
S.1. There is a policy on graduation requirements.
IMPLEMENTATION
I.1. The students are regularly informed of the academic requirements of their respective courses.
OUTCOME/S
SYSTEM-INPUTS AND PROCESSES
S.1. The institution has policies on:
S.1.1. substitution or special arrangements whenever a faculty is on leave or absent;
S.1.2. giving awards and/or recognition for faculty and students with outstanding achievements; and
S.1.3. supervision/monitoring and evaluation of faculty performance.
IMPLEMENTATION
I.2. Dialogues are regularly conducted by the administration with the:
I.3. Quality instruction is assured through the following strategies:
I.3.1. conducting seminars/workshop on syllabi making;
I.3.2. holding workshops on test construction and the corresponding table of specifications;
I.3.3. Conducting of competencies assessment;
I.3.4. conducting supervisory visit of classes and providing assistance if necessary;
I.3.5. holding of regular faculty meetings;
I.3.6. requiring consultations between students and faculty;
I.3.7. conducting studies on academic performance of students; and
I.3.8. providing for the participation/ attendance of the faculty in in-service activites.
I.4. Periodic faculty performance evaluation on teaching and in other functions is done by at least three of the following:
I.4.1. the Dean/Academic Head/Department Chair;
I.4.3. the faculty member himself/herself;
I.4.4. peers; and
I.4.5. others (please specify)
I.6. Students are given recognition for exemplary academic and non-academic performances.
I.7. Outstanding achievement of students is recognized and encouraged through:
I.7.1. inclusion in the honor roll, Dean’s list, etc.;
I.7.2. grant of tuition scholarships;
I.7.3. award of honor medals and merit certificate;
I.7.4. membership in honor societies/honor class/sections, etc.;
I.8. Indicators on performance of graduates are studied as follows:
I.8.1.feedback from employers regarding performance of graduates.
OUTCOME/S
O.1. The faculty and students have commendable performance as a result of administrative support.