The following document is my developed goals for my two chosen competencies and my Action Plan and details from Term 1:
Competency 1: Group Processes
Competency 2: Adult Learning
empower colleagues to learn, design, and present their lessons to other colleagues.
Foundational Competency: Collaborate Purposefully
Pathway Competency: Coaching/Mentoring
Artifact 1-Action Plan:
Artifact 2: Community Mapping Exercise attached below. I will use this to go to my key stakeholders in implementing my action plan. The results of this mapping exercise showed me that I have a few important key stakeholders to reach as I begin my Term 2 work leading into my capstone project. The focus groups from this exercise were my SPED colleagues and English/Math department Reg. Ed. teachers. Also, my BEA school representative (Science teacher and Teacher Fellow) will be a key stakeholder. Finally, I will need to keep to constant communication with my two administrators for their support.
Personal Philosophy of Educational Equity
Equity is how people are treated by everyone around them, keeping in mind personal biases, discrimination, judgements, and inequity. My current reality is that judgements and assumptions are made about races and people on a daily basis. We, as a society, do not look at treating everyone around us as a whole person, keeping these key concepts in mind. All backgrounds of people must consider race, gender, and social class when teaching and learning about Educational Literacy programs and equity. These needs are being addressed in our society.
Educational equity is using equity literacy principles as a framework in understanding how people are treated despite continued biases, discrimination, racism, sexism, etc. These are the needs that need to continually be addressed in our society as a whole. I believe that we have to change people’s perceptions and judgements about how they act and treat each other. This needs to be done with small groups of people at first, then reaching out to bigger groups, such as businesses and corporations. Then, I believe a systematic approach to educational equity can be adopted and implemented.
Educational equity is being reflected each week in school cultures. Some school staff, students, and parents work so closely together that they model and implement equity. This is done by showing and giving respect to all members of the school culture. Next, all school staff and administration need to be aware of cultural diversity in the building. On my cultural diversity needs assessment with 5 respondents from the math/english departments, I concluded that staff in general needed to improve on challenging others when they make racist/sexual/ethnic comments, encouraging culturally diverse people to speak out on their issues and concerns, seek opportunities to connect with people different than them, and understanding the definition and examples of internalized racism.
Other schools are not working so closely together with regards to equity work. These school cultures and staff are more independent of each other and are failing to see and implement equity principles. This can bring a school culture down and bring negativity and hate towards each other and students.
I am constantly motivated by watching and learning from educators around me each day. I try my very best to respect all students and treating everyone around me with respect, not judging, discriminating, or holding personal biases against others. We are here for the good of the student and I often think we forget that at times within our own selves. When we don’t have a solid foundation on our own equity morals and beliefs, this can negatively affect our equity work within our school culture. I look forward to continuing to try and shift this paradigm in the upcoming years in the teaching profession.
Artifact 3
My survey data from the Learn phase surveys indicated the following areas of most evident needs for improvement for my overarching and pathway chosen competencies within my professional context:
The teacher competency assessment showed higher ratings (4’s on a scale 1-4) for relevance for teaching and school priority than teacher proficiency. So, I focused on teacher proficiency based on my survey results from two teachers. 3/4 of the competencies from the survey were scored an average below 2, showing proficiency. Competency 2 had the highest average at 2.4. I focused on collaborating with the two teachers who filled out this survey on how to deliver high quality, evidence-based instruction. We discussed various strategies and approaches to increase teacher instruction. We will continue this discussion as we collaborate in August to improve our math department instruction and teaching methods.
Artifact 4: Cultural Diversity Self Assessment: 5 responses from teachers including myself:
The results of my Needs Assessment indicated two areas of concern. These questions on the survey were:
So, out of 20 questions among the 5 staff members who completed the cultural diversity Needs assessment, these were the only two questions of concern. Overall, staff understood and had a good concept of diversity and self-awareness. This is a good sign as we build staff moral from year to year. These concerns were not addressed and due to low number of respondents, I am unsure of addressing this issue in the upcoming school year.
1. My leadership as a SPED PLC group leader will be vital to the success of my proposed action plan. My leadership and persistence each week with my Reg. Ed. teacher population and administrators will allow for collaboration among on key stakeholders to meet my action plan goals. My leadership will drive other teachers to become confident and more involved in the decision-making process. Needs of key stakeholders will be addressed during weekly PLC meetings with the student needs at the forefront of every meeting.
2. Collaboration, questioning, data, reflection during implementation of action plan? I collaborate with my Reg. Ed. teachers almost on a daily basis regarding student IEP goals and needs, reg. ed. assignments/tests, etc. Collaboration will be used when looking at student's IEP goals and teaching and learning to meet this goals. If I have students in Reg. Ed. classes, I will need to support them in the resource room from their content and academic areas. I will question what Reg. Ed. teachers teach (unit and lesson plans available), and how I can support their curriculum in meeting the needs of my resource students. I will use grades, projects, quizzes as well as behavior check lists, check-in's with teachers (surveys, emails, face to face, etc.) for my data and progress reports. Finally, I will reflect each week on how my collaboration is going with my colleagues from my data results.
3. I will address any obstacles along the way in talking to Reg. Ed. teachers by confronting them face to face or via email to keep them informed on the components of my program (Core Plus-described later). We are all (or should be) in education to teach and assist kids at all times.
4. See artifacts and information in Do Section. This will be a work in progress over the next few years. I look forward to using the 'Core Plus' approach and sharing my knowledge and teaching others the importance of incorporating resource students into Reg. Ed. classrooms.